Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/ide/pci/cs5530.c |8 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: b/drivers/ide/pci/cs5530.c
===
--- a/drivers/ide/pci/cs5530.c
+++ b/dri
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&ide_lock, flags);
> - /* all CPUs (there should only be one CPU with this chipset) */
> -
NAK
What about pre-emptible kernels. Put in a private lock.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EM
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&ide_lock, flags);
> > - /* all CPUs (there should only be one CPU with this chipset) */
> > -
>
> NAK
>
> What about pre-emptible kernels. Put in a private lock.
All the removed code resided in init_chipset_cs5530()
> All the removed code resided in init_chipset_cs5530() which is called only
> during the controller initialization. Moreover pata_cs5530 also don't have
> any locking in cs5530_init_chip().
Fair enough, and I haven't found a reason for the locking being needed
from doc reviews (hence its not in
