Re: [PATCH UPDATED] libata: add support for ATA_16 on ATAPI

2007-08-02 Thread Mark Lord
Tejun Heo wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Tejun Heo wrote: Jeff, Mark, are you guys okay with the modified version? Close! Thanks for revising! My only comment now is that I dislike atapi_scmd85. That means nothing to me. I liked the old name better. Or maybe use atapi_passthru16. The

[PATCH UPDATED] libata: add support for ATA_16 on ATAPI

2007-08-01 Thread Tejun Heo
From: Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add support for issuing ATA_16 passthru commands to ATAPI devices managed by libata. It requires the previous CDB length fix patch. A boot/module parameter, atapi_scmd85=1 can be used to globally disable this feature, if ever desired. tj: renamed

Re: [PATCH UPDATED] libata: add support for ATA_16 on ATAPI

2007-08-01 Thread Tejun Heo
Jeff Garzik wrote: Tejun Heo wrote: From: Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add support for issuing ATA_16 passthru commands to ATAPI devices managed by libata. It requires the previous CDB length fix patch. A boot/module parameter, atapi_scmd85=1 can be used to globally disable this feature,

Re: [PATCH UPDATED] libata: add support for ATA_16 on ATAPI

2007-08-01 Thread Jeff Garzik
Tejun Heo wrote: From: Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add support for issuing ATA_16 passthru commands to ATAPI devices managed by libata. It requires the previous CDB length fix patch. A boot/module parameter, atapi_scmd85=1 can be used to globally disable this feature, if ever desired. tj: