On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 02:41:22 +0900
Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Why can't libata do the right thing and just send IDENTIFY command
> > to the slave device first?
>
> That's my plan B. I'm just not sure whether it would do any good, would it?
Should
On Sunday 25 February 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Why can't libata do the right thing and just send IDENTIFY command
> > to the slave device first?
>
> That's my plan B. I'm just not sure whether it would do any good, would it?
Probably it would but to know for
> According to Annex B of ATA/ATAPI-5, IDENTIFY should be issued to the
> slave device first to ensure that it releases PDIAG- and then use the
> cable detection result from the master device. As we IDENTIFY master
> first right after reset, slave if present is driving PDIAG-, so the
> master on I
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Why can't libata do the right thing and just send IDENTIFY command
> to the slave device first?
That's my plan B. I'm just not sure whether it would do any good, would it?
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the b
On Sunday 25 February 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
> [cc'ing Mark, Bart and Sergei. Hi]
>
> Alan wrote:
> >>> This makes unreliable cable detection even more unreliable. Please
> >>> consider for -stable. Thanks.
> >
> > At minimum you also need to stop doing drive side detect for PATA_CBL_80
> > as
[cc'ing Mark, Bart and Sergei. Hi]
Alan wrote:
>>> This makes unreliable cable detection even more unreliable. Please
>>> consider for -stable. Thanks.
>
> At minimum you also need to stop doing drive side detect for PATA_CBL_80
> as many controllers don't do both so if you've got host side det
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:52:22 -0500
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
> > 80c test mask is at bits 18 and 19 of EIDE Controller Configuration
> > not 22 and 23. Fix it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > This makes unreliable cable detection e
Tejun Heo wrote:
80c test mask is at bits 18 and 19 of EIDE Controller Configuration
not 22 and 23. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This makes unreliable cable detection even more unreliable. Please
consider for -stable. Thanks.
drivers/ata/pata_amd.c |4 ++--
1
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:01:28 +0900
Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 80c test mask is at bits 18 and 19 of EIDE Controller Configuration
> not 22 and 23. Fix it.
ACK - verified against data sheet.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a m
80c test mask is at bits 18 and 19 of EIDE Controller Configuration
not 22 and 23. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This makes unreliable cable detection even more unreliable. Please
consider for -stable. Thanks.
drivers/ata/pata_amd.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 in
10 matches
Mail list logo
