Re: [PATCHSET #upstream-fixes] libata: update HPA handling

2007-08-28 Thread Jeff Garzik
Tejun Heo wrote: Tejun Heo wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Tejun Heo wrote: Hello, The current HPA handling implementation isn't robust enough and causes regressions on several cases. This patchset contains HPA handling update. * blacklist devices which puke on READ_NATIVE_MAX * proper/better err

Re: [PATCHSET #upstream-fixes] libata: update HPA handling

2007-08-26 Thread Tejun Heo
Tejun Heo wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Tejun Heo wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> The current HPA handling implementation isn't robust enough and causes >>> regressions on several cases. This patchset contains HPA handling >>> update. >>> >>> * blacklist devices which puke on READ_NATIVE_MAX >>> * prop

Re: [PATCHSET #upstream-fixes] libata: update HPA handling

2007-08-16 Thread Tejun Heo
Jeff Garzik wrote: > Tejun Heo wrote: >> Hello, >> >> The current HPA handling implementation isn't robust enough and causes >> regressions on several cases. This patchset contains HPA handling >> update. >> >> * blacklist devices which puke on READ_NATIVE_MAX >> * proper/better error handling - i

Re: [PATCHSET #upstream-fixes] libata: update HPA handling

2007-08-16 Thread Jeff Garzik
Tejun Heo wrote: Hello, The current HPA handling implementation isn't robust enough and causes regressions on several cases. This patchset contains HPA handling update. * blacklist devices which puke on READ_NATIVE_MAX * proper/better error handling - in most cases, HPA failure won't result

[PATCHSET #upstream-fixes] libata: update HPA handling

2007-08-15 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, The current HPA handling implementation isn't robust enough and causes regressions on several cases. This patchset contains HPA handling update. * blacklist devices which puke on READ_NATIVE_MAX * proper/better error handling - in most cases, HPA failure won't result in detection failur