: [patch 2.6.22-rc6] ATA: add a PCI ID for Intel
Santa Rosa PATA controller
On Wednesday, 4. July 2007, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Maybe Alan or someone from Intel can answer that and thus
tell us how to
move forward; it would be really nice to get the patch that
started this
thread (it got posted
Maybe Alan or someone from Intel can answer that and thus tell us how to
move forward; it would be really nice to get the patch that started this
thread (it got posted by Chuck again today) could go into 2.6.22, but I
assume the time runs away...
Folks should be back Monday I suspect. Its the
On 02.07.2007 07:02, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 28.06.2007 21:47, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 06/28/2007 03:16 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
[Forgot to mark subj: as a patch; attached]
From: Christian Lamparter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATA: add a PCI ID for Intel Santa Rosa PATA controller.
On Monday, 2. July 2007, you wrote:
On 02.07.2007 07:02, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hmmm. From looking at the ICH8-Datasheet (
http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/313056.htm
or http://download.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/31305603.pdf )
page 189 and later it seems to me that the
On 02.07.2007 13:24, Chr wrote:
On Monday, 2. July 2007, you wrote:
On 02.07.2007 07:02, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hmmm. From looking at the ICH8-Datasheet (
http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/313056.htm
or http://download.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/31305603.pdf )
page 189
On Monday, 2. July 2007, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
but Alan Cox wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide%40vger.kernel.org/msg07417.html
Its ich_pata_133 - all the newer chips are.
Intel afaik never supported Ultra ATA 133 officially in any of the
mainstream desktop or mobile
On 28.06.2007 21:47, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 06/28/2007 03:16 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
[Forgot to mark subj: as a patch; attached]
From: Christian Lamparter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATA: add a PCI ID for Intel Santa Rosa PATA controller.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 06/28/2007 03:16 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
[Forgot to mark subj: as a patch; attached]
Sorry, using attachments (a) decreases reviewers and (b) makes your
patch HARDER to apply. See #7 under Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this
