Correction Re: Bug is fixed in 2.6.23.1: sata_promise: port is slow to respond, reset failed

2007-11-09 Thread Peter Favrholdt
Hi, I previously wrote this issue was fixed by upgrading to 2.6.23.1 There were some mails on this list regarding a workaround for an Asic bug and of course I'm looking forward to trying it :-) Anyway here goes for completeness: * 2.6.23.1 completed dd-stress tests as described earlier

Re: Bug is fixed in 2.6.23.1: sata_promise: port is slow to respond, reset failed

2007-10-15 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:21:13 +0200, Peter Favrholdt wrote: The problem is solved in 2.6.23.1 regarding the port slow to respond issue. I'm using sata_promise on Promise Technology, Inc. PDC40718 (SATA 300 TX4) (rev 02) and 4 Seagate 500GB ES drives. Using 2.6.23.1 it is possible to run

Re: Bug is fixed in 2.6.23.1: sata_promise: port is slow to respond, reset failed

2007-10-15 Thread Peter Favrholdt
Hi Mikael Pettersson wrote: However, I don't see how the sata_promise changes from 2.6.22 to 2.6.23 can explain this. The only functional changes there are a critical fix for FastTrack TX4200 (not your card), and support for SATA hotplugging (not happening here). So I'm suspecting something in

Bug is fixed in 2.6.23.1: sata_promise: port is slow to respond, reset failed

2007-10-14 Thread Peter Favrholdt
Hi, The problem is solved in 2.6.23.1 regarding the port slow to respond issue. I'm using sata_promise on Promise Technology, Inc. PDC40718 (SATA 300 TX4) (rev 02) and 4 Seagate 500GB ES drives. Using 2.6.23.1 it is possible to run dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=1M dd if=/dev/sdb