I'm CC'ing linux-ide... looks like the disk which you say is 20GB is
misdetected by the IDE layer as being 2GB.
Ok, so we have:
> >> Probing IDE interface ide0...
> >> hda: WDC WD800JB-00FMA0, ATA DISK drive
> >> hdb: IC35L020AVVN07-0, ATA DISK drive
> >> hda: Enabling Ultra DMA 4
> >> hdb: Enabl
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
I'm CC'ing linux-ide... looks like the disk which you say is 20GB is
misdetected by the IDE layer as being 2GB.
Ok, so we have:
Probing IDE interface ide0...
hda: WDC WD800JB-00FMA0, ATA DISK drive
hdb: IC35L020AVVN07-0, ATA DISK drive
hda: Enabling Ultra DMA 4
On Friday 20 April 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I'm CC'ing linux-ide... looks like the disk which you say is 20GB is
> misdetected by the IDE layer as being 2GB.
>
> Ok, so we have:
>
> > >> Probing IDE interface ide0...
> > >> hda: WDC WD800JB-00FMA0, ATA DISK drive
> > >> hdb: IC35L020
> Since this is a 2.6.17->2.6.18 regression narrowing the problem down to
> the specific changeset (or at least -git or even -rc) seems like a most
> promising way in discovering the source of the issue.
Dunno... unless I missed something in the logs, both 2.6.17 and .18 seem
to report initially
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Friday 20 April 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
I'm CC'ing linux-ide... looks like the disk which you say is 20GB is
misdetected by the IDE layer as being 2GB.
..
And here you can see that the partition map tries to use about 20GB...
so there is a discre
