I wanted to open a discussion on libata and PATA.
libata-dev now has two drivers that support PATA, pata_pdc2027x and
ata_piix, and the core is getting close (DMA blacklist in, C/H/S support
close).
What are the opinions on issues relating to making PATA libata support
available in the
* With ATA passthru (in libata-dev currently), libata supports SMART and
the HDIO_CMD/HDIO_TASK generalized ioctls. Should I care about
supporting other ioctls?
is there some other mechanism to en/disable write caching?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide
Mark Hahn wrote:
* With ATA passthru (in libata-dev currently), libata supports SMART and
the HDIO_CMD/HDIO_TASK generalized ioctls. Should I care about
supporting other ioctls?
is there some other mechanism to en/disable write caching?
Besides the SG_IO | HDIO_DRIVE_CMD | HDIO_DRIVE_TASK |
On Sul, 2005-02-13 at 18:51, Jeff Garzik wrote:
libata-dev now has two drivers that support PATA, pata_pdc2027x and
ata_piix, and the core is getting close (DMA blacklist in, C/H/S support
close).
Do you have DMA change down sorted - CRC error, drop speed and/or switch
to PIO then later flip
Alan Cox wrote:
On Sul, 2005-02-13 at 18:51, Jeff Garzik wrote:
libata-dev now has two drivers that support PATA, pata_pdc2027x and
ata_piix, and the core is getting close (DMA blacklist in, C/H/S support
close).
Do you have DMA change down sorted - CRC error, drop speed and/or switch
to PIO
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:01:51 EST, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Mark Hahn wrote:
* With ATA passthru (in libata-dev currently), libata supports SMART and
the HDIO_CMD/HDIO_TASK generalized ioctls. Should I care about
supporting other ioctls?
is there some other mechanism to en/disable write caching?
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 06:19:31PM -0600, Doug Maxey wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:01:51 EST, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Mark Hahn wrote:
* With ATA passthru (in libata-dev currently), libata supports SMART and
the HDIO_CMD/HDIO_TASK generalized ioctls. Should I care about
supporting other