Gaston, Jason D wrote:
>>> What is the difference between NA and RV? If the controller only has
>>> access to 2 ports, does it matter which I set the nonexistent port
>>> values to in the map?
>> NA is used for unimplemented ports of a valid configuration while RV is
>> used to mark invalid MAP va
>> What is the difference between NA and RV? If the controller only has
>> access to 2 ports, does it matter which I set the nonexistent port
>> values to in the map?
>
>NA is used for unimplemented ports of a valid configuration while RV is
>used to mark invalid MAP value. So, NA should be mixed
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tejun Heo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 6:08 PM
>> To: Gaston, Jason D
>> Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: ICH9 2 port SATA controller port map?
&g
>-Original Message-
>From: Tejun Heo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 6:08 PM
>To: Gaston, Jason D
>Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: ICH9 2 port SATA controller port map?
>
>Gaston, Jason D wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
&g
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ICH9 has DeviceID's for 2 port, IDE mode, SATA controllers. The current
> port map in ata_piix is setup for the 4 port controllers. This seems to
> work ok, but I wonder if a new port map should be defined for the 2 port
> controllers, where the two ports are
