On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:28:22AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> That would be nice. Muli, want to make a patch for this?
Sure, I'll put something together.
Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:31:40PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:20:08AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > > In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe
> > > approach, although it could p
2008/2/15, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:20:08AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > > In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe
> > > approach, although it could probably conver
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:20:08AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe
> > approach, although it could probably converted provided we got the
> > ordering right with regards
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe
> approach, although it could probably converted provided we got the
> ordering right with regards to regular PCI device
> initialization. Doesn't seem to be worth
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:17:03PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Hm, that's wierd. I thought I got something, until I realized that
> you are doing a lot of logic before you ever even determine that
> your hardware is present in the system. Why are you calling
> calgary_locate_bbars() and doing all of
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:14:59AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 07:47:11PM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:32:03AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > > Is there some reason you aren't using the "real" PCI driver api here
> > > and registering a pci driver
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PATCH] ide: mark "ide=reverse" option as obsolete
- it is valid only if "Probe IDE PCI devices in the PCI bus order
(DEPRECATED)" config option is used
- Greg needs to remove pci_get_device_reverse() for PCI core changes
Cc:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 01:02:55AM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Thursday 14 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:20:36PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:28:24AM -08
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:20:36PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:28:24AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:34:12PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zol
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:20:36PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:28:24AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:34:12PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 13 February 2
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:28:24AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:34:12PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:17:37AM +, Alan Cox wrot
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:28:24AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:34:12PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:17:37AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > > Why does the calgary driver need this? C
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 07:47:11PM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:32:03AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > Is there some reason you aren't using the "real" PCI driver api here
> > and registering a pci driver for these devices? That would take the
> > whole "loop over all p
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:32:03AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Is there some reason you aren't using the "real" PCI driver api here
> and registering a pci driver for these devices? That would take the
> whole "loop over all pci devices" logic out of the code entirely.
I recall we had a reason, but
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:34:12PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:17:37AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > Why does the calgary driver need this? Can we just use pci_get_device()
> > > > instead? Why do you need
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:32:26AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:16:38PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > Why does the calgary driver need this? Can we just use
> > pci_get_device() instead? Why do you need to walk the device list
> > backwards? Do you get false positive
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:17:37AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Why does the calgary driver need this? Can we just use pci_get_device()
> > > instead? Why do you need to walk the device list backwards? Do you get
> > > false positives going forward
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:16:38PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Why does the calgary driver need this? Can we just use
> pci_get_device() instead? Why do you need to walk the device list
> backwards? Do you get false positives going forward?
It's not strictly needed, we used it for symmetry. Feel f
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:17:37AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Why does the calgary driver need this? Can we just use pci_get_device()
> > instead? Why do you need to walk the device list backwards? Do you get
> > false positives going forward?
>
> It doesn't look to be performance critical so t
> Why does the calgary driver need this? Can we just use pci_get_device()
> instead? Why do you need to walk the device list backwards? Do you get
> false positives going forward?
It doesn't look to be performance critical so the driver can
pci_get_device until the end and use the final hit any
21 matches
Mail list logo
