Re: SATA: Is "DPO and FUA" ever supported?

Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >>> scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA ST3250620NS 3.AE PQ: 0 >>> ANSI: 5 >>> SCSI device sda: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) >>> SCSI device sda: write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't >>> support DPO or FUA > >>> for SATA disk drives. A

Re: SATA: Is "DPO and FUA" ever supported?

Hello, I wrote. On each and every machine out there, and on every dmesg output posted on numerous mailinglists, I see messages similar to this: scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA ST3250620NS 3.AE PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 SCSI device sda: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) SCSI devic

Re: SATA: Is "DPO and FUA" ever supported?

Hello. Michael Tokarev wrote: On each and every machine out there, and on every dmesg output posted on numerous mailinglists, I see messages similar to this: scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA ST3250620NS 3.AE PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 SCSI device sda: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059

SATA: Is "DPO and FUA" ever supported?

On each and every machine out there, and on every dmesg output posted on numerous mailinglists, I see messages similar to this: scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA ST3250620NS 3.AE PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 SCSI device sda: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) SCSI device sda: write cache: en