Re: correct kernel parameter in documentation.

2007-09-28 Thread Jeff Garzik
Dave Jones wrote: 'noacpi' isn't a standalone parameter, give it its prefix. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> applied (though in general we should not list module parameters here, I am OK with this one) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in

Re: correct kernel parameter in documentation.

2007-09-27 Thread Alan Cox
> if you're going to add that libata-related parm to the kernel parms > file, wouldn't it make sense for consistency to add the other > available boot-time parms from libata-core.c as well? it seems > counter-productive to document only a subset of them from the same > source file. He's not addin

Re: correct kernel parameter in documentation.

2007-09-27 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Dave Jones wrote: > 'noacpi' isn't a standalone parameter, give it its prefix. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > index 4d175c7..a87bc58 100644 > --- a/Documentation/

correct kernel parameter in documentation.

2007-09-27 Thread Dave Jones
'noacpi' isn't a standalone parameter, give it its prefix. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt index 4d175c7..a87bc58 100644 --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt +++ b/Documentation/kernel-param