On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:37:00PM +0200, Ilan Cohen wrote:
> I have i386 based machine with ASUS SIS 964/180 SATA/RAID and it seem
> tha Linux (redhat 9.0) or Debian 3r5 don't
> Recognize it - what should I do so it will see the SATA drive.
> Thanks,
> Ilan.
RedHat 9.0 is obsolete. Re
Duh, I am an untruther. Please try either net-inst or businesscard
iso from here:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
Marc
Ilan Cohen wrote:
Hi Marc,
I have download " debian-30r5-i386-binary-1_NONUS", and it
didn't work
What is 3.05? I thought that 30r5 is the latest.
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
somthing that I cannot read
Hetz, you should know that many mailers out there cannot read your email
(uudecoder format error). I use pine (the latest!).
regards,
Peter
=
To unsubscribe, send
Oron Peled wrote:
Haven't used it myself, but:
http://www.htmldoc.org/
Looks like it does what you need.
It does, if you don't need Hebrew. If you do, you're toast.
Thanks for all the responses! I sadly conclude that common
wisdom has it that short of firing up a VFB, starting a browser
of sorts a
Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Neither one of them does support SATA out of the box (surely not Redhat 9!).
Best solution - use a distribution which does (doesn't SARGE have some
sort of bootable ISO which does support it?), like Fedora Core 3, RHEL
4, SuSE 9.3, Mandrake 10.1.
I quite disagree on no suppo
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 06:06:07PM +0300, eliad lubovsky wrote:
> Following steps is to maintain only one interval of fixed size virtual
> addresses (lets say 128KB) for all tasks, and every context switch to
> update its PTE entries - making it 'small is beautiful' (by saving
> virtual addresses
Following steps is to maintain only one interval of fixed size virtual
addresses (lets say 128KB) for all tasks, and every context switch to
update its PTE entries - making it 'small is beautiful' (by saving
virtual addresses (and physical)) and bug free (from corrupting the
thread_info memory data
Neither one of them does support SATA out of the box (surely not Redhat 9!).
Best solution - use a distribution which does (doesn't SARGE have some
sort of bootable ISO which does support it?), like Fedora Core 3, RHEL
4, SuSE 9.3, Mandrake 10.1.
Thanks,
Hetz
On 5/4/05, Ilan Cohen <[EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 05:27:54PM +0300, eliad lubovsky wrote:
> The 16K (which could be of any size (32, 64, 128)) is a contiguous
> virtual address space belongs to a specific task. It enables the SP to
> increment that size without corrupting the thread_info data.
I understand; however, the Li
I
have i386 based machine with ASUS SIS 964/180 SATA/RAID and it seem tha Linux (redhat 9.0) or Debian 3r5 don't
Recognize
it – what should I do so it will see the SATA drive.
Thanks,
Ilan.
The 16K (which could be of any size (32, 64, 128)) is a contiguous
virtual address space belongs to a specific task. It enables the SP to
increment that size without corrupting the thread_info data.
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 16:01, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:50:54PM +0300, el
Vasiliev Michael wrote:
If you go with the alternative of some kind of web interface, where mods log
in and rate messages, you can instantly remove the ones already rated from
another mod's desk (let's face it, the probability of error is very small)
but you add the burden of running a more then
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Vasiliev Michael wrote:
[... snipped ...]
> > >This will make the adding of moderators something that can ease the burden
> > >on current moderators.
>
> > It will also bring the support users get back to the one they get from a
> > single moderator, more or less.
[... snipped
On Wednesday May 4 2005 13:33, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Orna Agmon wrote:
> >On Wed, 4 May 2005, Vasiliev Michael wrote:
> >>Now to the point. I demand to have my current salary doubled (at least)
> >> or the list gets it! (the SPAM)
> >
> >When we have several moderators for a list, they all get t
On Wednesday May 4 2005 14:04, Alon Altman wrote:
> On Wed, 4 May 2005, Orna Agmon wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 May 2005, Vasiliev Michael wrote:
> >> Now to the point. I demand to have my current salary doubled (at least)
> >> or the list gets it! (the SPAM)
> >
> > When we have several moderators for a l
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:28:29PM +0300, eliad lubovsky wrote:
> Hi,
> current thread_info structure (and sp) are allocated via the kmalloc()
> interface. I am trying to allocate it using vmalloc() which works fine
> for 4KB stack size. When trying to allocate 8KB stack size I got a
> double fault
Hi,
current thread_info structure (and sp) are allocated via the kmalloc()
interface. I am trying to allocate it using vmalloc() which works fine
for 4KB stack size. When trying to allocate 8KB stack size I got a
double fault exception when booting the kernel. Does anyone knows why? I
can add reg t
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 06:19:02PM +, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
>
> http://www.mozilla.org/unix/remote.html
>
Lovely. From there one can easily find the code
if (lastArgument.EqualsIgnoreCase("postscript", PR_TRUE)) {
argument.Truncate(index);
rv = NS_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED;
}
Does i
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Orna Agmon wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Vasiliev Michael wrote:
Now to the point. I demand to have my current salary doubled (at least) or the
list gets it! (the SPAM)
When we have several moderators for a list, they all get the mails, and
the unsubsribed real messages to the list
Orna Agmon wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Vasiliev Michael wrote:
Now to the point. I demand to have my current salary doubled (at least) or the
list gets it! (the SPAM)
When we have several moderators for a list, they all get the mails, and
the unsubsribed real messages to the list get better
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 09:15:18PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> More importantly, does
>
> mozilla -remote "saveAS(google.ps,PostScript)"
>
> work? Because this key step fails here (FC1), and if my memory does not fail
> me,
> this is what failed almost 3 years ago when I remarked about the
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Vasiliev Michael wrote:
> Now to the point. I demand to have my current salary doubled (at least) or the
> list gets it! (the SPAM)
When we have several moderators for a list, they all get the mails, and
the unsubsribed real messages to the list get better service. but more
peo
rami rosen wrote:
Hello,
I last August there was a thread in this forum regarding that the
linux kernel will not include anymore
pwc drivers (for Philips and many other USB webcams).
Yes, I've started this thread.
see for example : "August Bad news for philips webcam users" in
http://www.mail-arc
23 matches
Mail list logo
