Alex Behar wrote:
Good morning Amos,
LD_DEBUG (as of early glibc 2.3 versions IIRC), LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_PRELOAD
do not work on SUID binaries, unless you are root.
Further more, there are ways to achieve the goal Shaul needs by using
capabilities(7).
I would recommand a very small hack for chr
Alex,
Alex Behar wrote:
> Also, Gilad, a binary will keep its permissions and attributes if copied
> while
> root and by using the "-a" flag to cp, consult the man pages for more
> details.
Of coruse it does! you've missed the entire point of my post -
*non-root* users don't get to keep sui
On 09 May 2005 08:15:10 +, Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a suggestion. If you post your question to
> comp.lang.c++.moderated or to an appropriate gcc forum someone there
> will explain what happens, and probably quote the Standard to
> you. I'll be happy to learn what the
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Shachar,
I don't understand this statement. I suspect that you have a different
mental picture of "undefined behavior". The official "definition of
undefined behavior" is that *anything* may happen.
No. The official definition of "undefined behavior" is that the behavi
Good morning Amos,
LD_DEBUG (as of early glibc 2.3 versions IIRC), LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_PRELOAD
do not work on SUID binaries, unless you are root.
Further more, there are ways to achieve the goal Shaul needs by using
capabilities(7).
I would recommand a very small hack for chrooting dynamic exe
Shachar,
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Let's get one thing clear. NOTHING results in undefined behavior. If
> anything resulted in undefined behavior, it would have been impossible
> to pass it between caller and callee.
I don't understand this statement. I suspect that you hav
On Monday 09 May 2005 05:21, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 5/9/05, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 08 May 2005 15:40, you wrote:
> > > Other Linux benefits that I thought of is that since Linux is open
> > > source, all applications he will probably need are handy for download;
> >
On 5/9/05, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 08 May 2005 15:40, you wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried to convince somebody I know to move to Linux at home and
> > at work. I am myself an advocate user of Linux at work and at home.
> >
> > He works with a XP at work (a
On 5/9/05, Dan Kaspi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> >I can easily update all of my software with the latest security updates.
>
> Well , if I am not wrong this is only specific to Debian. (BTW : I don't
> know Debian :
> I want to take advantage of this opportunity and ask : does
> only non-s
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm encountering a strange problem, and would like to hear the list's
ideas on why that would be. The following C++ program:
#include
class test {
public:
virtual ~test();
};
void func( const test ¶m, ... )
{
va_list
how about not having to reboot every few days. for me, uptime is one of the
biggest advantages of linux, and nowadays, i'm not the only one who leaves my
home computer on 24/7.
On Sunday 08 May 2005 15:40, you wrote:
> Are there other Linux benefits which I can pose for moving to Linux ?
> (exce
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 06:16:54PM +0300, Yosef Meller wrote:
>
>>As an example to why linux is more sucure, see the latest flaw in
>>Firefox: it allows an attacker to create a file on your machine. This
>>could be used to create a batch file on windows, or a shell script in
Age-ist also. apparently no one over 30 (Shachar, Marc, Ira, Eli
Marmor, yba, etc...) need apply... But hey Netta, cut the fellow a little
slack, he was attempting to sound cool, "in", "with it", etc. He never
expected the abuse that he received from us and he doesn't deserve it. He
was offerin
i guess it's a men-only company...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nitzan
Sent: Thu, May 05, 2005 10:36 PM
To: linux-il@linux.org.il
Subject: [ barely On-Topic ] Job Offer - Network Engineer
[snip]
So if you are a young dude, bored with all
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 06:16:54PM +0300, Yosef Meller wrote:
>
> As an example to why linux is more sucure, see the latest flaw in
> Firefox: it allows an attacker to create a file on your machine. This
> could be used to create a batch file on windows, or a shell script in
> Linux; however, on L
As an example to why linux is more sucure, see the latest flaw in
Firefox: it allows an attacker to create a file on your machine. This
could be used to create a batch file on windows, or a shell script in
Linux; however, on Linux shell scripts (or any other file) are not
executable by default, yo
--=-W1SDTauwu9aD0oKgCaEm
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 15:40 +0300, Dan Kaspi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to convince somebody I know to move to Linux at home and
> at work. I am myself an advocate user of Linux at work and at home.
>
>
On Sunday 08 May 2005 15:40, you wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to convince somebody I know to move to Linux at home and
> at work. I am myself an advocate user of Linux at work and at home.
>
> He works with a XP at work (a hightech company; however , he is
> not a programmer) ,an
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 05:28:38PM +0300, Dan Kaspi wrote:
> Hi,
> >I can easily update all of my software with the latest security updates.
>
> Well , if I am not wrong this is only specific to Debian. (BTW : I don't
> know Debian :
> I want to take advantage of this opportunity and ask : does
Hi,
I can easily update all of my software with the latest security updates.
Well , if I am not wrong this is only specific to Debian. (BTW : I don't
know Debian :
I want to take advantage of this opportunity and ask : does
only non-stable Debian have this feature or also the stable Debian?)
And
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm encountering a strange problem, and would like to hear the list's
> ideas on why that would be. The following C++ program:
>
> > #include
> >
> > class test {
> > public:
> > virtual ~test();
> > };
> >
> > void func( const test ¶m, ... )
> >
On Sun, 8 May 2005, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 04:20:22PM +0300, Josh Zlatin-Amishav wrote:
On Sun, 8 May 2005, Dan Kaspi wrote:
When listing the main advantages of Linux , the most important one
I had thought of was security ; when you access the internet from a Linux
m
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 04:20:22PM +0300, Josh Zlatin-Amishav wrote:
> On Sun, 8 May 2005, Dan Kaspi wrote:
> > When listing the main advantages of Linux , the most important one
> >I had thought of was security ; when you access the internet from a Linux
> >machine, chances that you get a vi
What Compiler version?
Hetz
On 5/8/05, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm encountering a strange problem, and would like to hear the list's
> ideas on why that would be. The following C++ program:
>
> > #include
> >
> > class test {
> > public:
> > virtual ~test();
> > };
> >
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I'm going to mark that off as a compiler bug and ignore it.
Shachar
Answering my own posts today.
g++ 3.4 does not suffer from this problem. I guess it really was a
compiler bug.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
Have you backed
On Sun, 8 May 2005, Dan Kaspi wrote:
Hello,
I tried to convince somebody I know to move to Linux at home and
at work. I am myself an advocate user of Linux at work and at home.
He works with a XP at work (a hightech company; however , he is
not a programmer) ,and also XP at
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Even stranger is the second warning. If "param" is not the last named
argument, what is?
Shachar
Ok, just so that I make sure that I'm not talking utter nonsense, I made
that into a complete program and tested. As expected, the compiler's
grim predictions of run
I'm encountering a strange problem, and would like to hear the list's
ideas on why that would be. The following C++ program:
#include
class test {
public:
virtual ~test();
};
void func( const test ¶m, ... )
{
va_list arg;
va_start( arg, param );
}
When trying to compile, I get the fo
Hello,
I tried to convince somebody I know to move to Linux at home and
at work. I am myself an advocate user of Linux at work and at home.
He works with a XP at work (a hightech company; however , he is
not a programmer) ,and also XP at home.
When listing the main advant
The Linux-IL Jobs Tracker (http://www.iglu.org.il/jobs/) now has an RSS Feed:
http://www.iglu.org.il/jobs/index.rss
I set it up because even I forgot to periodically check the job tracker for
new entries, and I figured most other people would as well.
Now you can subscribe to the feed, and rece
Shaul Karl wrote:
Can you give more details about what you wrote?
Shaul Karl wrote:
On my Debian machine only root is permitted to chroot(2). What are the
cons for having a regular user chroot? Are there any patches floating
around to change that?
If there exists any dynamically linked SUID
31 matches
Mail list logo
