Hi,
Please try the following MPI patch for john:
http://www.bindshell.net/tools/johntheripper
Ido
On 6/12/06, Michael Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/11/06, Daniel Daboul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/11/06, Michael Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, maybe I need to clarify thi
On 6/11/06, Daniel Daboul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/11/06, Michael Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, maybe I need to clarify this a bit further: I need to crack only
> one password.
I have never tried it, but it seems that Medussa does much of what you want:
Yeah, it indeed seems c
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:35:27AM +0300, Oded Arbel wrote:
> I don't believe the OSS emulation is ALSA is using 32KHz. I'm not sure
> if its a fixed rate, but on my computer it seems to be using 48KHz
> (which makes much more sense - sound cards work with either 44.1KHz or
> 48KHz).
Yes, except t
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 22:35 +0300, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:25:44PM +0300, Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what you mean - are you talking about OSS vs. ALSA ? Fedore
> > Core 5 supports OSS using the OSS-ALSA emulation layer which works fine
> > for me. More
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 22:35 +0300, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:25:44PM +0300, Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what you mean - are you talking about OSS vs. ALSA ? Fedore
> > Core 5 supports OSS using the OSS-ALSA emulation layer which works fine
> > for me. More
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:25:44PM +0300, Oded Arbel wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean - are you talking about OSS vs. ALSA ? Fedore
> Core 5 supports OSS using the OSS-ALSA emulation layer which works fine
> for me. More then that - Fedora Core 5 supports dmix/dsnoop out of the
> box, and works
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 17:00 +0300, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> Under FC4 it worked perfectly. Under FC5, there is no sound. It turns out
> that VLC uses the old sound system, while the latest kernel does not
> support it properly.
I'm not sure what you mean - are you talking about OSS vs. ALSA
Are you quite sure this is necessary?In debian, you just 'apt-get upgrade' can't you immitate it with RH?On 6/11/06, Oded Arbel <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 19:42 -0700, E Leibovich wrote:
Given a live server that runs many relatively uncommon
programs (for instance
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 04:33:44PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> Don't.
> I mean it.
> I saw many Fedora/Debian/Slackware/ users who tried a
> live update and ended up with dead OS on their hands.
> Especially if you can't really fix the machine is something goes bad.
Don't is a good way to put it
On 6/11/06, Michael Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, maybe I need to clarify this a bit further: I need to crack only
one password.
I have never tried it, but it seems that Medussa does much of what you want:
Package: medussa (0.8-4)
Distributed password cracking system
Medussa is a di
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 19:42 -0700, E Leibovich wrote:
> Given a live server that runs many relatively uncommon
> programs (for instance openACS) and which runs RH9.
> How would you upgrade it with minimal downtime?
> 1) Is upgrading to Fedora advisable? It seems it'd
> cause less headache, since co
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 09:51 +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2006, E Leibovich wrote about "Upgrading live RH9":
> > Given a live server that runs many relatively uncommon
> > programs (for instance openACS) and which runs RH9.
> > How would you upgrade it with minimal downtime?
> > 1)
You can try and follow the welcome to linux series.
The question is for what job (s)he needs the UNIX knowledge.
--
Orr Dunkelman,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"If it wasn't for C, we'd be writing programs in BASI, PASAL, and OBOL", anon
Spammers: http://vipe.technion.ac.il/~orrd/spam.html
GPG fingerprin
On 6/11/06, Ariel Biener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Assuming this is a academic cracking process, then read john's manual
and FAQ.
Ok, maybe I need to clarify this a bit further: I need to crack only
one password.
I'm looking for a way to put guessing work from say [a..m] on one CPU
and [n..z
On 1/26/02, guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i think you forgot to add "and the reason i'm involved in such suspicious
activities is that i need bla bla bla (put a convincing description of a
legitimate need to run such password crackers here...)
.and assuming I provide you with an absolut
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 10:23 +0200, Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> Are you quite sure this is necessary?
> In debian, you just 'apt-get upgrade' can't you immitate it with RH?
As mentioned before - Nope.
Its not an inherent weakness of RPM based distros - if that's what you
were thinking - I have succe
On Saturday 26 January 2002 12:07, guy keren wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Michael Green wrote:
>
> > Is there an easy way to split a single john process into several
> > (smaller?) tasks each running ona separate CPU in order to speed up
> > the cracking process?
> > I've got a dozen of Optero
On Sunday 11 June 2006 11:49, Amichai Rotman wrote:
>
> Q1: How much should I charge?
He's your friend... :)
$35-40/hr for teaching
$50/hr for preparation of the sylabus and the teaching materials...
> Q2: Is there any "silabus" I could follow? I never done this before...
Well, use common sens
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Michael Green wrote:
> Is there an easy way to split a single john process into several
> (smaller?) tasks each running ona separate CPU in order to speed up
> the cracking process?
> I've got a dozen of Opteron cores idling here...
i think you forgot to add "and the reason
Hi all,
A friemd of mine is applying for a job and they want him to have basic GNU/Linux knowladge. He asked me if I could tutor him and he is willing to pay me for it.
Q1: How much should I charge?
Q2: Is there any "silabus" I could follow? I never done this before...
Q3: Which are the basic c
Is there an easy way to split a single john process into several
(smaller?) tasks each running on a separate CPU in order to speed up
the cracking process?
I've got a dozen of Opteron cores idling here...
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
===
--=-ekMODUnqMt3psXrhMux9
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 19:42 -0700, E Leibovich wrote:
> Given a live server that runs many relatively uncommon
> programs (for instance openACS) and which runs RH9.
> How would you upgrade it with minimal downtime?
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006, E Leibovich wrote about "Upgrading live RH9":
> Given a live server that runs many relatively uncommon
> programs (for instance openACS) and which runs RH9.
> How would you upgrade it with minimal downtime?
> 1) Is upgrading to Fedora advisable? It seems it'd
It is very easy
23 matches
Mail list logo
