-Original Message-
From: Imri Zvik
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:46 AM
To: 'Aviram Jenik'
Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
Subject: RE: Israeli ISP blocking outgoing SMTP
-Original Message-
From: Aviram Jenik [mailto:avi...@jenik.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 6:46 PM
To:
-Original Message-
From: Aviram Jenik [mailto:avi...@jenik.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 6:46 PM
To: Imri Zvik
Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
Subject: Re: Israeli ISP blocking outgoing SMTP
Noam didn't say blocking port 25 for everyone is a good thing or that he
likes
it - just that t
Blacklisting is very effective, but should be done carefully.
Senderbase-like solutions proved to be _very_ effective, without much of
false positives.
What I do object, is uceprotect-like blacklists who automatically block
huge ranges for a ridiculous amount of spam.
I do agree that blocking port
On Friday 10 April 2009 02:41:19 e2xbegqsdyt21hfc wrote:
> Is the following paragraph correct:
>
> The program does not do that. Instead, behaves
> as described earlier.
>
> ?
>
That doesn't sound right to me.
> Wouldn't the following is correct, or, at least, better:
>
> The program
Second.
e2xbegqsdyt21hfc wrote:
> Is the following paragraph correct:
>
> The program does not do that. Instead, behaves
> as described earlier.
>
> ?
>
> Wouldn't the following is correct, or, at least, better:
>
> The program does not do that. Instead, it behaves
> as described
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:01 AM, sara fink wrote:
>
> First, Orange isn't trustable. They will say you a price and in fact charge
> you other prices, etc. People who were abroad were charged for calls they
> didn't do, etc. A quick look at tluna web site about orange will reveal the
> real truth.
