Hello Oron,
Nice to hear from You.
The only thing I can say is that when I add
secondary address to eth or dummy with
ifconfig (not ifup script) it adds route entry,
and only with loopback it does not.
--
Semion Lisyansky
>From: Oron Peled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Semion L
ut what's
the reason?
--
Semion Lisyansky
_
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL
At 11:43 AM 3/11/99 +0200, Vadim Smelyansky wrote:
>SL>/sbin/ipnatadm -O -i -W eth1 -S -M
>SL>/sbin/ipnatadm -I -i -W eth1 -D -N
> ipnatadm have not an -b (bidirect rule) option?
it has, but since I still playing with it same with ipchains rules
>
>
> What exactly you can not
At 09:49 AM 3/11/99 +0200, Vadim Smelyansky wrote:
>
> telnet, hmm... why not at least ssh? or you have sslay telnetd
>installed?
well, theese are not unices, actually part of them even not computers
> I think you can do this without patch
>just make an alias of external interface (
ect: Re: NAT and Masquerading
>Today, Semion Lisyansky blurbed:
>
>
>> >NAT and IP Masquerading is the same thing.
>>
>> When I told NAT I meant the static NAT. I use IP NAT patch
>> originally written by Michael Hassenstein for kernels 2.0.x
>> and then port
T only.
>
>On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Semion Lisyansky wrote:
>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> I am trying to implement solution that uses both - IP NAT and
>> IP Masquerading with kernel 2.2.x - without great success.
>> Is someone have an experience with this issue? Can it
Hi List,
I am trying to implement solution that uses both - IP NAT and
IP Masquerading with kernel 2.2.x - without great success.
Is someone have an experience with this issue? Can it work
together at all?
Best Regards
Shimon Lisyansky
