On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 08:13, Omer Zak w...@zak.co.il wrote:
The issue here is not opposing the Israeli occupation but about the
academic boycott.
Would you find it to be acceptable for the Palestinians to use ABC
(atomic/biological/chemical) weapons to fight the Israeli occupation
because
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 at 12:23:27 (GMT+2) Uri Even-Chen
u...@speedy.net wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 08:13, Omer Zak w...@zak.co.il wrote:
The issue here is not opposing the Israeli occupation but about the
academic boycott.
Would you find it to be acceptable for the Palestinians to
On Tuesday 07 Jun 2011 12:43:51 Stan Goodman wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 at 12:23:27 (GMT+2) Uri Even-Chen
u...@speedy.net wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 08:13, Omer Zak w...@zak.co.il wrote:
The issue here is not opposing the Israeli occupation but about the
academic boycott.
On Jun 7, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Stan Goodman wrote:
That is a very brief list of some of the things that go over Mr
Stallman's head. I think they amount to gross hypocrisy. Giving him a
pass for his hypocrisy is also hypocritical.
Stan (and others),
This is Israel, and he is allowed to be a
On Jun 7, 2011, at 12:59 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
How do all these things of what the Palestinians are doing wrong,
invalidate
Stallman's criticism against Israel? Shouldn't Israel behave properly
regardless of whatever the other side is doing?
Yes, Israel should. The question of what is
On Jun 7, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Stan Goodman wrote:
That is a very brief list of some of the things that go over Mr
Stallman's head. I think they amount to gross hypocrisy. Giving him a
pass for his hypocrisy is also hypocritical.
Stan (and others),
This is Israel, and he is allowed to
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:20 PM, geoffrey mendelson
geoffreymendel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 12:59 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
And we are getting way off-topic here.
No, we are not. RMS has chosen to marry the two topics, now we have to
accept one if we want the other.
No, RMS
I think that everyone has an opinion, a political agenda and a
personal agenda. I chose to use FOSS as a way to defend my right to
use any software in anyway I want and not to be tide to the
political/business agenda of a proprietary software provider.
The right to use free software should be a
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:17:06PM +0300, geoffrey mendelson wrote:
This, BTW is why I dislike the GPL, it has some baggage attached, which
now includes BDS. I much prefer BSD's do what you want, but don't do it
here* license.
BSD is bad because:
A. It's all to much like BDS (which can't
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 13:17, geoffrey mendelson
geoffreymendel...@gmail.com wrote:
In case you don't know what I am talking about:
http://www.bdsmovement.net/
Thanks for the link. My opinion is that Richard Stallman has the right to
express his opinions against the Israeli occupation, with
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 07:40 +0300, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
I agree with Richard Stallman's views about the Israeli occupation.
The issue here is not opposing the Israeli occupation but about the
academic boycott.
Would you find it to be acceptable for the Palestinians to use ABC
11 matches
Mail list logo
