Re: [li..........il: related]: Quantum relativity 0.1 - redefining numbers;

2008-04-24 Thread Uri
Hello friends, [7-2-3-4-5-6-1][7-2-3-4-5-6-1][1-2-3-4-5-6-7][7-6-5-4-3-2-o][7-6-5-4-3-2-O][1-6-5-4-3-2-o] [0-2-3-4-5-6-1][0-2-3-4-5-6-1][O-2-3-4-5-6-1][7-6-5-4-3-2-O][7-6-5-4-3-2-o][7-6-5-4-3-2-o] [7-2-3-4-5-6-1-7-2-3-4-5-6-1-1-2-3-4-5-6-7] [2-3-4-5-6-1-7-2-3-4-5-6-1-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-7] [3-4-5-6-1-7

Re: [li..........il: related]: Quantum relativity 0.1 - redefining numbers;

2008-04-23 Thread Uri
By the way, I wrote very long; if you want it short then let it be this way. I'll define you my new AXIOM [there is no such thing as a prime number, but it is a true axiom]: base 10 (binary 10==01+01): // actually that's base prime 10*10; base 4; either 10 or 01 can be primes; but not both; bas