attached is a revised patch for bezeq support, relative to current pptp
cvs. bezeq support is now a run time mechanism, via a
--quirks=BEZEQ_ISRAEL switch. for this, i implemented a general quirks
mechanism, which allows overriding the out_call_rqst packet
construction, start_ctrl_conn packet cons
Le 2001-11-13, Dani Arbel écrivait :
> with other ISPs using the same equipment. On the other hand, once
> implemented, the pptp is not fully compatible with the RFC . Maybe it
> would make sense to make a #define per ADSL modem that is bugy.
Yep, or some sort of 'quirk table' as is commonly fou
>
> With Alcatel modems, I found a bug in the unit for ISDN lines. The fix
> (refering to ver. 1.0.1 of pptp )is
> actualy trivial and will not make the code non rfc complient. I will see
> if it is at all neede for the current version.
>
What does ISDN has to do with ADSL?
I mean, as far as
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:04:19 +0200 (IST), you wrote:
> +#else /* PPTP_BEZEQ_ISRAEL is defined */
> +{
> + PPTP_HEADER_CTRL(PPTP_OUT_CALL_RQST),
> + 0, /* hton16(call->callid) */
> + 0, /* hton16(call->sernum) */
I don't understand why you need this: call->callid and call->ser
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:31:28 +0200 (IST), you wrote:
> > - I'm wondering if the #define should be something other than Bezeq.
> > Have you heard if any other implementations need this change? Have you
> > any idea what software or hardware Bezeq is using to deliver ADSL?
> >
>
> Bezeq
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, James Cameron wrote:
> G'day mulix,
good day, james.
> Thank you for your patch to pptp that adds support for Bezeq.
thank you for maintaining pptp and thanks to the original author, for
writing it.
> - I'm wondering if the #define should be something other than Bezeq.
>
James,
As one of the people that were involved in integrating support for Bezeq
ADSL I would like to answer one of your questions.
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, James Cameron wrote:
> G'day mulix,
>
> - I'm wondering if the #define should be something other than Bezeq.
> Have you heard if any other imple
G'day mulix,
Thank you for your patch to pptp that adds support for Bezeq.
I'm the pptp-client project administrator, or release engineer, and I've
taken on the job in the past few months.
My comments on your patch follow:
- I'm wondering if the #define should be something other than Bezeq.
H
