On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 09:49:34PM +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Ira Abramov
>
>> > make sure you did dist-upgrade and not just upgrade. I think without it,
>>
>> Why "dist-upgrade"? It's a s
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 09:49:34PM +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Ira Abramov
> > make sure you did dist-upgrade and not just upgrade. I think without it,
>
> Why "dist-upgrade"? It's a security fix for the same distro (Debian Etch).
The "dist-upgrade" is due to the
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 09:49:34PM +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
> Why "dist-upgrade"? It's a security fix for the same distro (Debian Etch).
Contrary to common wisdom (and intuition), dist-upgrade is not related
to upgrading between distros. The difference between it and upgrade is
that upgrade will
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Ira Abramov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Fri, 30 May:
>>
>> All packages on my Debian Etch desktop are up to date, "vulnkeys"
>> found old vulnerable keys and I cleaned them up (also from other
>> systems).
>>
>> BUT - I can't g
Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Fri, 30 May:
>
> All packages on my Debian Etch desktop are up to date, "vulnkeys"
> found old vulnerable keys and I cleaned them up (also from other
> systems).
>
> BUT - I can't generate good keys on Debian any more:
that's odd. are you sure you are not r
(Sent to Noam in private by mistake - sorry Noam)
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Noam Rathaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The new ssl and ssh packages don't work if they are given known vulnerable
>
> During upgrade/update they upgrade/replace bad keys
All packages on my Debian Etch desktop ar
