Howdy list,
Thanks to mulix, my Linux ADSL connection is up and running. Next, I set
up IP masquerading, and encountered the following odd problem.
When conneting from some host on the LAN, every time the remote host
tries to send "a lot of data at once" (a large TCP packet, perhaps?),
the masqu
reduce the maxmtu of the win boxes to 1452 and they will work fine.
Dani
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Eran Tromer wrote:
> Howdy list,
>
> Thanks to mulix, my Linux ADSL connection is up and running. Next, I set
> up IP masquerading, and encountered the following odd problem.
>
> When conneting from so
Hello,
I tried reducing the MTU on the client box, and it doesn't help. I can't
see why it should -- the problem occurs when the *remote* host is
sending a large packet *into* the LAN.
Looking at captured network traffic both between the masquerading box
and the ADL modem and between the masquer
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Eran Tromer wrote:
> I tried reducing the MTU on the client box, and it doesn't help. I can't
> see why it should -- the problem occurs when the *remote* host is
> sending a large packet *into* the LAN.
just a small suggestion (even it doesn't settle well with your descripti
Howdy,
guy keren wrote:
> just a small suggestion (even it doesn't settle well with your description
> of packet sniffing): set the masquerading machine (the 'gateway') to
> always defrag IP packets (echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_always_defrag).
> i think i saw this as a required setting for m
Eran,
use mru 1542 and mtu 1542 in your pptp command to reduce the packet size
received from the peer.
This is updated in the new HOWTO
Dani
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Eran Tromer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried reducing the MTU on the client box, and it doesn't help. I can't
> see why it should -- the p
>
> > note that masquerading normally works in a manner
> transparent to remote
> > gateways (e.g. the ADSL modem and anything beyond it towards your
> > provider) so a different between the behaviour of the
> masquerading gateway
> > and the masqueraded client(s) is probably a
> misconfiguration
nal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dani Arbel
> Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 10:13 AM
> To: Eran Tromer
> Cc: linux-il
> Subject: Re: IP masquerading and ADSL
>
>
> Eran,
> use mru 1542 and mtu 1542 in your pptp com
4, 2001 10:13 AM
> > To: Eran Tromer
> > Cc: linux-il
> > Subject: Re: IP masquerading and ADSL
> >
> >
> > Eran,
> > use mru 1542 and mtu 1542 in your pptp command to reduce
> > the packet size
> > received from the peer.
> > This is upda
Thanks! Works fine for me, once I convinced those Windows boxes to pay
attention to their MTU settings (hint -- if you create the W2K registry
entry as String instead of DWORD then W2K will silently ignore you, and
I know no easy way to get the currently used settings...).
Sheesh. Automatic MTU
10 matches
Mail list logo