IP masquerading and ADSL

2001-02-03 Thread Eran Tromer
Howdy list, Thanks to mulix, my Linux ADSL connection is up and running. Next, I set up IP masquerading, and encountered the following odd problem. When conneting from some host on the LAN, every time the remote host tries to send "a lot of data at once" (a large TCP packet, perhaps?), the masqu

Re: IP masquerading and ADSL

2001-02-03 Thread Dani Arbel
reduce the maxmtu of the win boxes to 1452 and they will work fine. Dani On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Eran Tromer wrote: > Howdy list, > > Thanks to mulix, my Linux ADSL connection is up and running. Next, I set > up IP masquerading, and encountered the following odd problem. > > When conneting from so

Re: IP masquerading and ADSL

2001-02-03 Thread Eran Tromer
Hello, I tried reducing the MTU on the client box, and it doesn't help. I can't see why it should -- the problem occurs when the *remote* host is sending a large packet *into* the LAN. Looking at captured network traffic both between the masquerading box and the ADL modem and between the masquer

Re: IP masquerading and ADSL

2001-02-03 Thread guy keren
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Eran Tromer wrote: > I tried reducing the MTU on the client box, and it doesn't help. I can't > see why it should -- the problem occurs when the *remote* host is > sending a large packet *into* the LAN. just a small suggestion (even it doesn't settle well with your descripti

Re: IP masquerading and ADSL

2001-02-03 Thread Eran Tromer
Howdy, guy keren wrote: > just a small suggestion (even it doesn't settle well with your description > of packet sniffing): set the masquerading machine (the 'gateway') to > always defrag IP packets (echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_always_defrag). > i think i saw this as a required setting for m

Re: IP masquerading and ADSL

2001-02-04 Thread Dani Arbel
Eran, use mru 1542 and mtu 1542 in your pptp command to reduce the packet size received from the peer. This is updated in the new HOWTO Dani On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Eran Tromer wrote: > Hello, > > I tried reducing the MTU on the client box, and it doesn't help. I can't > see why it should -- the p

RE: IP masquerading and ADSL

2001-02-04 Thread Haim Gelfenbeyn
> > > note that masquerading normally works in a manner > transparent to remote > > gateways (e.g. the ADSL modem and anything beyond it towards your > > provider) so a different between the behaviour of the > masquerading gateway > > and the masqueraded client(s) is probably a > misconfiguration

RE: IP masquerading and ADSL

2001-02-04 Thread Haim Gelfenbeyn
nal Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dani Arbel > Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 10:13 AM > To: Eran Tromer > Cc: linux-il > Subject: Re: IP masquerading and ADSL > > > Eran, > use mru 1542 and mtu 1542 in your pptp com

RE: IP masquerading and ADSL

2001-02-04 Thread Dani Arbel
4, 2001 10:13 AM > > To: Eran Tromer > > Cc: linux-il > > Subject: Re: IP masquerading and ADSL > > > > > > Eran, > > use mru 1542 and mtu 1542 in your pptp command to reduce > > the packet size > > received from the peer. > > This is upda

Re: IP masquerading and ADSL

2001-02-04 Thread Eran Tromer
Thanks! Works fine for me, once I convinced those Windows boxes to pay attention to their MTU settings (hint -- if you create the W2K registry entry as String instead of DWORD then W2K will silently ignore you, and I know no easy way to get the currently used settings...). Sheesh. Automatic MTU