On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 09:14:47AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>Hi, Amos,
> >>I was very pleased with the hardware recognition of Knoppix (I
> >>think it was version 3.2). Out of curiosity I checked it on several
> >>computers. Lat
Diego Iastrubni wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Amos,
I was very pleased with the hardware recognition of Knoppix (I
think it was version 3.2). Out of curiosity I checked it on several
computers. Lately I tried PClinuxOS-NV (Mandrake), which was also good.
But neither was 100% perfect.
You
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Amos,
I was very pleased with the hardware recognition of Knoppix (I
think it was version 3.2). Out of curiosity I checked it on several
computers.
Lately I tried PClinuxOS-NV (Mandrake), which was also good.
But neither was 100% perfect.
You may wish to try a couple
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 07:50:22PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I helped my mom order her first computer. We have it without Windows on
> it and we hope to have it delivered during next week (Sukot).
>
> I was wondering how can/should I test that we really got what we ordered
> (h
Hello,
I helped my mom order her first computer. We have it without Windows on
it and we hope to have it delivered during next week (Sukot).
I was wondering how can/should I test that we really got what we ordered
(heard stories about people getting something completly
different/missing parts etc)
