On 18/03/07, Dan Bar Dov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's a good question to which I have no answer.
I don't know how google do it. I can think of
1. special file system
2. some kind of "scrubber" - a daemon scanning for FS changes and copying
whatever changed
3. use a sync tool (rsync?) on ada
That's a good question to which I have no answer.
I don't know how google do it. I can think of
1. special file system
2. some kind of "scrubber" - a daemon scanning for FS changes and copying
whatever changed
3. use a sync tool (rsync?) on adaily (hourly?) basis
I doubt google has 1. This is som
On 07/03/07, Dan Bar Dov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suggest you read the latest summary on the reports on storage at
http://storagemojo.com/?p=383
http://storagemojo.com/?p=378
The bottom line conclusions I made out of those are
1. Do not use RAID5. Stick to RAID 1 (0+1).
2. Use cheap SATA st
I suggest you read the latest summary on the reports on storage at
http://storagemojo.com/?p=383
http://storagemojo.com/?p=378
The bottom line conclusions I made out of those are
1. Do not use RAID5. Stick to RAID 1 (0+1).
2. Use cheap SATA storage - even build-yourself. The big bucks don't
buy y
Hey all
I formerly had a gentoo box with a 4x250GB software RAID5, no LVM,
ext3 filesystem, using disks sdc,sdd,sde and sdf. sda and sdb were the
OS disks.
I was to move the RAID over to a new machine running debian. Further
to this, my backup of the data turned out to be only partial.
The new d
