Take 2. More readable?
Perhaps the real problem is that the rdns does not point to the sending domain?
$ host tux.hamakor.org.il
tux.hamakor.org.il has address 82.80.248.176
$ host 82.80.248.176
176.248.80.82.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
bzq-82-80-248-176.dcenter.bezeqint.net.
Contrast tha
Shaul Karl wrote:
Take 2. More readable?
Perhaps the real problem is that the rdns does not point to the sending domain?
$ host tux.hamakor.org.il
tux.hamakor.org.il has address 82.80.248.176
$ host 82.80.248.176
176.248.80.82.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
bzq-82-80-248-176.dcenter.bezeqin
Shaul Karl wrote:
Take a look at [3-5] of
http://whatsup.org.il/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=45462
Yes, I'll try to solve it. However, experience shows that this is not,
by far, a simple thing to ask. I'll handle it next week sometime and see
whether anything changes.
Shachar
Hi,
That's a very good reason to blacklist.
If the reverse resolution does not match the original hostname - many email
servers will blacklist your data. It looks like a novice spammer.
- Noam
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Shaul Karl wrote:
>
>> Ta
Take a look at [3-5] of
http://whatsup.org.il/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=45462
- Original Message -
From: Shachar Shemesh
Date: Saturday, October 11, 2008 9:55
Subject: Re: Re, more readable?: Email Hosting (POP+SMTP) Recommendation
To: Shaul Karl
Cc: Shlomi Fis
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Shaul Karl wrote:
> > Take a look at [3-5] of
> http://whatsup.org.il/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=45462>
> Yes, I'll try to solve it. However, experience shows that this
> is not, by far, a simple thing to ask.
This difficulty is probably an important
Having reverse DNS point to your fixed IP is not that difficult at all
(if I got the thread's idea right).
Been there done that a year+ ago and Bezeq int and 013 Barak agreed on
providing this entry in their DNS servers for free, when I already had a
fixed IP. The whole thing is really negotia
On Saturday 11 October 2008, Boaz Rymland wrote:
> As usual, unfortunately, the biggest amount of time I needed to invest
> in setting this configuration with my ISP was explaining to support
> people what I'm talking about and trying to get as quickly as possible
> their business technical support