Ira,
Have you tried the "FreeNX" project? It gives superior performance over VNC
& supports multi-sessions and/or multi-users. (which VNC does not)
It is linked with the standard X libraries on your system (X.org in RHEL4/5
case) so I suspect it should provide all the X extensions you require.
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 14:40 +0200, Ira Abramov wrote:
> (and as I said - "xhost
> +" works but is too permissive)
Did you look into the options which xhost provides (man xhost)? Maybe
there is an option which provides you with the right security
limitations?
> > On Feb 3, 2008 11:15 AM, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > VNC on Windows behaves differently than on Linux. On Linux, it
> > > opens its own unique X server, and then exports its display using
> > > the VNC protocol. On Windows, VNC server exports the main Windows
> > >
On Feb 3, 2008 12:49 PM, Ilya Konstantinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2008 11:15 AM, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > VNC on Windows behaves differently than on Linux. On Linux, it opens its
> > own unique X server, and then exports its display using the VNC
> > protoco
On Feb 3, 2008 11:15 AM, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> VNC on Windows behaves differently than on Linux. On Linux, it opens its
> own unique X server, and then exports its display using the VNC
> protocol. On Windows, VNC server exports the main Windows display.
Nowadays, you have
Ira Abramov wrote:
Time to go test their local windows Xserver and see what it DOES
support.
VNC on Windows behaves differently than on Linux. On Linux, it opens its
own unique X server, and then exports its display using the VNC
protocol. On Windows, VNC server exports the main Windows di
Quoting Shachar Shemesh, from the post of Sun, 03 Feb:
> Ira Abramov wrote:
>
>> is the RHEL-supplied Xvnc ignoring MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE because of
>> configuration, or something missing at compile time?
> I believe they ignore it because their X server doesn't support it.
damn... I suspected that was
Ira Abramov wrote:
is the RHEL-supplied Xvnc ignoring MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE because of
configuration, or something missing at compile time?
I believe they ignore it because their X server doesn't support it.
A VNC server is also an X server, which means that you are NOT using a
X.org or XFree86 ba
On Feb 2, 2008 11:49 PM, Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> howdie gang!
>
> I have two clients with a similar problem: the run a job dispatcher that
> sends their requests to a free node in a compute cluster to run a
> compilation or simulation of the system. Some of those jobs are supposed
