On Wed, Oct 30, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Timezone GMT+2 and Date
behavior:
I set the same timezone GMT+2 in three different machines, running the following O/S:
(note that you usually use XYZ+2, where XYZ is the name you're going to
call the timezone; Calling it GMT is valid
Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is the way I always remember it being it on UNIX; West of
England (e.g., the USA) was positive offsets, east (e.g., Israel)
was negative.
The confusion is, apparently, due to the fact that the normal time
reporting lists time as UTC + offset, with
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about Re: Timezone GMT+2 and Date
behavior:
Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is the way I always remember it being it on UNIX; West of
England (e.g., the USA) was positive offsets, east (e.g., Israel)
was negative.
The confusion
behavior
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Timezone
GMT+2 and Date behavior:
I set the same timezone GMT+2 in three different machines, running the
following O/S:
(note that you usually use XYZ+2, where XYZ is the name you're going to
call the timezone; Calling it GMT is valid
Hi,
I set the same timezone GMT+2 in three different
machines, running the following O/S:
Tru64 4.0D, Solaris 8, Linux RH 7.2
In order to get the time difference between the
GMT+2 time and the UTC time, I just typed the date and date
-u
in all the three machines, and suprisingly, the UTC
