On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 14:15 +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 11/14/2011 01:36 PM, Omer Zak wrote:
The business does not exist today because we were not successful
in locating another good niche once the original niche disappeared
(which was far from taking us by surprise).
But this is
Hello,
There was a discussion in this mailing list titled File I/O within
kernel threads
about 2 weeks ago.
It was said there, more than once, that A kernel thread is a proccess context.
Thinking about it a little I wonder what is the meaning by saying that.
I looked for example at kswapd.
Hi Everyone,
My workplace needs to test its product on RedHat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) but
they think they don;t have the money to pay for multiple licenses in
order to install
it on many servers.
I'd like to know if they are right - do you HAVE to pay RH for the
right to install RHEL
AS on your
I'd like to know if they are right - do you HAVE to pay RH for the
right to install RHEL
AS on your server or is the payment required ONLY if you want to
subscribe to their
update service?
Slightly off-thread, but still - wondering if companies, such as yours, even
consider using
Well, I'll try to track the decision chain for you:
1. We target customers which, among other platforms, run also RHEL (AS or ES,
as far as we can tell right now).
2. We need to test our product to make sure that it runs well on those
platforms.
3. We want to save money on installing multiple
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
My workplace needs to test its product on RedHat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) but
they think they don;t have the money to pay for multiple licenses in
order to install
it on many servers.
Slashdot has an article today about Dell saying that RHEL is too
On Wednesday 08 December 2004 17:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How close are cAos/CentOS to what we should expect at customers
who run real RHEL? From reading the item at Linmagazine (thanks for
the poiner!)
1. AFAIK RedHat uses only free software in all its distros (including
the
Hi,
Anyone conidered this: http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/
Quote:
This product is derived from the Free/Open Source Software made
available by Red Hat, Inc but IS NOT produced, maintained or supported
by Red Hat. Specifically, this product is forked from the source code
for Red Hat's _Red Hat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
My workplace needs to test its product on RedHat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) but
they think they don;t have the money to pay for multiple licenses in
order to install
it on many servers.
I'd like to know if they are right - do you HAVE to pay RH for the
right to
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:08:05PM +0200, Oron Peled wrote:
3. CentOS, WhiteBox linux (and a third distro I forgot) all use the
same basic idea which is documented in the RedHat official FAQ's:
- Download the free software comprising RHEL (including updates).
- Replace the tradmarks
11 2003, 16:43,Oded Arbel:
offering is based) being install by IBM in National Security offices across
Sorry about the above mistake - just to make things clear, when I wrote
National Security I actually meant Social Security - BITUACH LEUMI.
--
Oded
::..
Any nitwit can understand
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003, Tzafrir Cohen wrote about Re: clarification:
In addition to the important distinction between open source software and
free software ...
The distinction you refer too is between the two ideologies (about *why*
this software is needed). The software itself
11 2003, 08:19, :
Regarding your article: Open questionDear Open Source Friends,
Here is my reply:
I had come across Prof. MacCormack's paper and I also found it very
interesting. I agree with him that the state of the art of TCO measurement
is not where we would like it to be
Two fixes (for an otherwise correct and focused answer) and some
additions.
On Thursday 11 December 2003 16:43, Oded Arbel wrote:
In addition to the important distinction between open source software and
free software ...
The distinction you refer too is between the two ideologies (about *why*
On Thursday 11 December 2003 22:31, Oron Peled wrote:
Two fixes (for an otherwise correct and focused answer) and some
additions.
On Thursday 11 December 2003 16:43, Oded Arbel wrote:
In addition to the important distinction between open source software and
free software ...
The
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 01:06:12AM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote:
On Thursday 11 December 2003 22:31, Oron Peled wrote:
Two fixes (for an otherwise correct and focused answer) and some
additions.
On Thursday 11 December 2003 16:43, Oded Arbel wrote:
In addition to the important distinction
On Friday 12 December 2003 01:06, Oded Arbel wrote:
On Thursday 11 December 2003 22:31, Oron Peled wrote:
The distinction you refer too is between the two ideologies (about *why*
this software is needed). The software itself is practically the same as
both the open source definition and the
Somebody reading the list spoke to personnel from aduva about the job
offer posted here.(that spurred the old Do I need a BSC to be a
prgrammer thread).
I just wanted to clarify that job is not for work in aduva.
I forwarded it by request of somebody representing the company hiring
(which I
Sorry for the noise, but apparently my last post wasn't clear -
I have equipment to give. No charge, and no strings attached, free as in
beer (but you have to bring your own beer). You don't even have to
promise to use it on a Linux system - just take it and go.
On the other hand (and in a
On the other hand (and in a totally non-related non-attached way), I am
looking for some junk myself. I don't necessarily expect a trade,
although that would be nice.
What kind of junk ? ;-)
Eli
BTW, I've been to BeyondSecurity. Nice place... :)
--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail
Clarification:
Thanks to the people who replied to me in private.
However, I would like to clarify that I am looking for free (open source
preferred) source code browser, rather than a commercial solution.
I am looking for a good C/C++ code browser, which will offer at least the
power
21 matches
Mail list logo
