On Wednesday 16 Jun 2010 22:40:42 Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> On יום רביעי 16 יוני 2010 13:47:35 Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > > To make a good comparison, please to boostrap clang properly (you need
> > > at least stage2, in theory from that point all binaries should be
> > > identical). Building clang here
On יום רביעי 16 יוני 2010 13:47:35 Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > To make a good comparison, please to boostrap clang properly (you need at
> > least stage2, in theory from that point all binaries should be
> > identical). Building clang here does take about an hour or two, yes,
> > builind a C++ compiler
On Wednesday 16 Jun 2010 12:34:44 Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> On יום רביעי 16 יוני 2010 08:33:55 Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Hi Diego,
> >
> > > (PS, If you want to fully bootstrap clang instead of just using stage1
> > > here, use this "ugly" shell script to get a "clang built with clang
> > > built clan
On יום רביעי 16 יוני 2010 08:33:55 Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi Diego,
> > (PS, If you want to fully bootstrap clang instead of just using stage1
> > here, use this "ugly" shell script to get a "clang built with clang built
> > clang", aka stage 3).
> >
> > Please report how good/bad clang is for your
On 15 June 2010 21:27, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> OK, found this comment now:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/391557/
>
> Reading from it:
>
> [quote]
> Actually they [= Apple] just refuse to touch anything GPLv3-related. And they
> often oversell LLVM because they compare it with years-old GNU stuff.
>
> T
Hi Diego,
On Tuesday 15 Jun 2010 23:06:04 Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> Shlomi:
>
>
> svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk llvm
> mkdir -p llvm/tools/clang
> svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk llvm/tools/clang
> mkdir llvm/cmake-build
> cd llvm/cmake-build
> ccmake ../
>
Shlomi:
svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk llvm
mkdir -p llvm/tools/clang
svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk llvm/tools/clang
mkdir llvm/cmake-build
cd llvm/cmake-build
ccmake ../
make
export CC=$PWD/bin/clang
export CXX=$PWD/bin/clang++
Now re-compile your librar
On Monday 14 Jun 2010 12:20:03 Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Monday 14 Jun 2010 02:30:24 Amos Shapira wrote:
> > There was an item on slashdot about LLVM project, have you tested it?
>
> LLVM is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Level_Virtual_Machine . I've
> learned about it from many places, including
On Monday 14 Jun 2010 02:30:24 Amos Shapira wrote:
> There was an item on slashdot about LLVM project, have you tested it?
>
LLVM is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Level_Virtual_Machine . I've learned
about it from many places, including fellow developers on IRC. I've tested it
with Freecell
There was an item on slashdot about LLVM project, have you tested it?
On 6/14/10, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> -- Forwarded Message --
>
> Subject: gcc-4.5.0 Success Story with Freecell Solver
> Date: Sunday 13 Jun 2010, 17:21:00
> From: Shlomi Fish
>
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: gcc-4.5.0 Success Story with Freecell Solver
Date: Sunday 13 Jun 2010, 17:21:00
From: Shlomi Fish
To: Freecell Solving Discussions
Executive summary: I have built installed gcc-4.5.0 and after Freecell Solver
ran faster, after I compiled it
11 matches
Mail list logo
