On Thursday 17 October 2002 10:12 am, Guy Baruch wrote:
> man mkreiserfs gives:
> > BUGS
> > No other blocksizes but 4k are available.
>
> so using reiserfs will not save space. ext2/3 do have 1K block-size.
> I do the copy once. Since this is a home-server (no more than 2-3
> queries a da
Quoting Nadav Har'El, from the post of Thu, 17 Oct:
>
> By the way, Hans Reiser's original rationale for writing ReiserFS was
> not to write a journaling filesystem that will take over Linux, per se
> - it was *exectly* to write a filesystem that will alleviate the need
> for database files, confi
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002, Ira Abramov wrote about "Re: why not reiserfs":
> another way to go about it, is not to use a disk partition as your
> hyrarchial DB, but use a relational DB instead and suck all those pesky
> tiny files into mySQL.
By the way, Hans Reiser's origin
Quoting Guy Baruch, from the post of Thu, 17 Oct:
> man mkreiserfs gives:
> > BUGS
> > No other blocksizes but 4k are available.
>
> so using reiserfs will not save space. ext2/3 do have 1K block-size.
Reiser will fold the tails of several files into a single block, and
small files may b
Guy Baruch wrote:
>
> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
>> Just a comment:
>>
>> You create a special partition for this, and it is supposed to have
>> large
>> directories with lots of small files. Did you consider use reiserfs?
>>
>>
>>
> yes, I know ext2/3 is not a good choice, (quadratic behaviour
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>Just a comment:
>
>You create a special partition for this, and it is supposed to have large
>directories with lots of small files. Did you consider use reiserfs?
>
>
>
yes, I know ext2/3 is not a good choice, (quadratic behaviour on copy).
reiserfs would have been my fir
