>> 3. It is recommended that new implementations of Hebrew e-mail
>>(including mailing lists...), will support the new standard.
>>One package that is already supporting it is (flame-resistent
>>underwear on...) MS Outlook Express 5 (not 4!).
>
>You've mentioned that this new standard
> DS>> 3. It is recommended that new implementations of Hebrew e-mail
> DS>>(including mailing lists...), will support the new standard.
> DS>>One package that is already supporting it is (flame-resistent
> DS>>underwear on...) MS Outlook Express 5 (not 4!).
You've mentioned that thi
DS>> 1. Contrary to common belief (and expressions on this forum),
DS>>there are *no* multiple standards of Hebrew e-mail. There
DS>>is exactly one standard for encoding Hebrew in e-mail
DS>>(RFC1555/6, and SI1904 - which are identical). This standard
Did you at least read the RFC? It
Just a few short notes on Hebrew e-mail:
1. Contrary to common belief (and expressions on this forum),
there are *no* multiple standards of Hebrew e-mail. There
is exactly one standard for encoding Hebrew in e-mail
(RFC1555/6, and SI1904 - which are identical). This standard
specifies
