Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > disabling the following radeonfb options in the .config made resume work > again: In general, don't even *try* to use radeonfb for suspend/resume. I don't think it has ever worked, except on some very rare laptops (largely PPC Macs) where people had

Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here's another suspend/resume artifact: one of my boxes wouldnt > > resume, it hangs at: > > > > [1.456633] pci :00:18.2: resuming > > [1.456641] pci :00:18.3: resuming > > [1.456648] 8139too :05:07.0: resuming > > [1.4566

Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's another suspend/resume artifact: one of my boxes wouldnt > resume, it hangs at: > > [1.456633] pci :00:18.2: resuming > [1.456641] pci :00:18.3: resuming > [1.456648] 8139too :05:07.0: resuming > [1.456667] radeonfb 0

Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas found a new twist to this today: applying the patch below > (which turns on ATA_DEBUG) made the SATA problem go away on his > laptop. Michael, could you try this patch, does it change the behavior > of your laptop in any way? Here's another su

Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Michael - does your 'date' output advance after resume? If not then > > i'd say it's a NO_HZ related problem. If yes then i'd guess it's the > > SATA problem. > > I'll test, but I have NO_HZ off for now. there can still be effects of it (the

Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
> > 2. First disk access after resume takes a couple of minutes > >(seemed instant with 2.6.20) during this time no new messages show on > > console > > Yeah, there is some problem with SATA resume. It would be beautiful if the > people who actually see this could narrow it down with bisecti

Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
> Quoting Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions > > > * Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 3. When I switch to X (CTRL-ALT-F7), X hangs after drawing a couple of > > > windows > > >after waiting for some 10 min, I rebooted. no new

Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
> Quoting Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Here's the status with -rc3: better, but still does not work as well as > > 2.6.20. > > Ok. I think we mostly solved the irq-related stuff, but you might want to > check whether you have CONFIG_NOHZ on or off and whether that makes a > diff

Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2. First disk access after resume takes a couple of minutes > >(seemed instant with 2.6.20) during this time no new messages > >show on console > > Yeah, there is some problem with SATA resume. It would be beautiful if > the people who ac

Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael - does your 'date' output advance after resume? If not then > i'd say it's a NO_HZ related problem. [...] in that case please do this on such a 'frozen date' system: echo q > /proc/sysrq-trigger and then send us the hw-timers info.

Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3. When I switch to X (CTRL-ALT-F7), X hangs after drawing a couple of > > windows > >after waiting for some 10 min, I rebooted. no new messages showed > >up in /var/log/messages > > I think this is likely just more of the disk being bugg

Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
[ Eric, Ingo, can you double-check the timer initialization after resume? We appear to have several reports of date not advancing, and while this could be some SATA issue, it could easily be a timer tick issue too ] On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Here's the status with -

Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Jeff Chua
On 3/8/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions > > Subject: ThinkPad T60: no screen after suspend to RAM > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/22/391 > Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <[EM

Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
> Quoting Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions > > Subject: ThinkPad T60: no screen after suspend to RAM > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/22/391 > Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : unknown Here's the status

Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Ash Milsted
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 06:09:06 -0500 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Subject: AT keyboard only works with pci=noacpi > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/3/68 > > Submitter : Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Status : unknown > > > sounds like a B