Re: [PATCH 0/2] wistron_btns: More keymaps

2007-03-19 Thread Éric Piel
19.03.2007 22:28, Dmitry Torokhov wrote/a écrit: On 3/15/07, Éric Piel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok, so let me summarize: There are two kinds of keys on those laptops (for which we are not sure about the keycode that it should generate): * Laptop screen on/off * Display output selection (for

Re: [linux-pm] [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-19 Thread Jim Gettys
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 16:33 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > What you say sounds good, assuming that the cost of a sleep is less than > the cost of the busy wait. But this may be hardware, the waits may be > very small and frequent, and if it's hitting a small hardware window > like retrace, de

Re: [PATCH 0/2] wistron_btns: More keymaps

2007-03-19 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On 3/15/07, Éric Piel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 03/14/2007 08:02 PM, Vojtech Pavlik wrote/a écrit: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 02:58:49PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > 2. I also have a concern about using KEY_SCREEN to signal toggling display on and off. I am CCing Vojtech - he must kn

Re: [PATCH] iforce: Use usb_kill_urb instead of usb_unlink_urb.

2007-03-19 Thread johann deneux
New attempt... Also attached it if the inlined patched gets corrupted. commit 0ba8785483c2ee7f56e8f242e000f6cd17a7da40 Author: Johann Deneux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat Mar 17 22:23:44 2007 +0100 iforce: Use usb_kill_urb instead of usb_unlink_urb. Using usb_unlink_urb can cause iforce

Re: [linux-pm] [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-19 Thread Bill Davidsen
Jim Gettys wrote: On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 17:07 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Some day we may have modesetting support in the kernel for some graphics hw, right now it's pretty damn spotty. Yep, that's the way to go. hey, i wildly supported this approach e

Re: [PATCH 0/7] usbhid: add load-time and run-time USB HID quirks configuration

2007-03-19 Thread Paul Walmsley
Hello Jiri, thanks for the review. On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote: You can currently "force" HID_QUIRK_IGNORE for the device that has been already bound to usbhid driver through 'unbind' file in sysfs. This lets you to ask usbhid driver to release the device. So you can just have HID_Q

Re: [PATCH] iforce: Use usb_kill_urb instead of usb_unlink_urb.

2007-03-19 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
Hi Johann, On Saturday 17 March 2007 17:43, johann deneux wrote: > commit 0ba8785483c2ee7f56e8f242e000f6cd17a7da40 > Author: Johann Deneux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat Mar 17 22:23:44 2007 +0100 I tried applying your patch but it appears that your mailer mangled it. Could you please resend i

Re: [PATCH 0/7] usbhid: add load-time and run-time USB HID quirks configuration

2007-03-19 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Paul Walmsley wrote: > The USB HID quirk list ('hid_blacklist') is a compile-time fixed array > in the current kernel. Any modifications require editing the module > source and recompiling. Some distributions compile the usbhid code into > the kernel, thus requiring that