On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > Also your solution cosumes significantly more memory (adding 16 bits to
> > every hid_blacklist entry, duplicating the information into list that in
> > most cases will stay intact and just mirror the contents of
> > hid_blacklist). Not that it's a big
Jim Gettys wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 16:33 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
What you say sounds good, assuming that the cost of a sleep is less than
the cost of the busy wait. But this may be hardware, the waits may be
very small and frequent, and if it's hitting a small hardware window
like
