johann deneux wrote:
> On 3/27/07, Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ok, so how to deal with these devices? Does anybody have some idea?
>> That's
>> what I was talking about somewhere in the beginning of this thread,
>> the raw
>> values, because it seems too specific for letting kernel
On 3/28/07, Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jiri Slaby napsal(a):
> Dmitry Torokhov napsal(a):
>> On Tuesday 27 March 2007 17:34, johann deneux wrote:
>>> What about adding a member to ff_effect which would be the number of the
motor?
>>> We can't change the layout of ff_effect too much th
On 3/29/07, Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:03:09AM +0530, Milind Arun Choudhary wrote:
>
>> +#define BIT(nr) (1UL << ((nr) % BITS_PER_LONG))
>>
>
> I think this would be a disaster because something like
>
>BIT(123)
>
> wo
