Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:39:45PM -0700, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > On Tuesday 13 November 2007 10:56, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:13:56PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote: > > > >

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 03:13:46PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 02:26:05PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > .. >>> If you've been making significant updates to a driver/subsystem, >>> and people are reporting that it is

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 07:32:19PM +, Russell King wrote: >... > There's another issue I want to raise concerning bugzilla. We have the > classic case of "not enough people reading bugzilla bugs" - which is one > of the biggest problems with bugzilla. Virtually no one in the ARM > community l

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 07:46:49PM +, Russell King wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 08:30:35PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > There is this silly limit that noone can work more than 168 hours per > > week on the Linux kernel, and some kernel developers seem to take the > >

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 02:26:05PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:47:10PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: >>> Adrian Bunk wrote: > .. >> Another point is that it shifts the work from the few experienced >> developers to the

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 02:12:57PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:47:10PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: >>> Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> ... >>>> I did bisecting myself, and I know that it costs time and work. >>>>

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:47:10PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > ... >> I did bisecting myself, and I know that it costs time and work. >> >> But the first point is the above one that it makes otherwise nearly >> undebuggable problems debuggable an

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:18:43PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:50:08PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: >>> Ingo Molnar wrote: >>>> for example git-bisect was godsent. I remember that years ago bisection >>>> of a b

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:50:08PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> for example git-bisect was godsent. I remember that years ago bisection of >> a bug was a very laborous task so that it was only used as a final, >> last-ditch approach for really nasty bugs. Today we can autono

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:13:56PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote: > > Btw, I used to test every -mm kernel. But since I've switched distros > > (gentoo->ubuntu) > > and I have less time, I feel it's harder to test -rc or -mm kernels (I

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 07:57:54AM -0800, Ray Lee wrote: > On Nov 13, 2007 7:24 AM, Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As a long time kernel tester, I see some problem with the > > newer "new development model". In the short merge windows, > > after to much time, there are to many

[RFC: 2.6 patch] remove the USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH driver

2007-10-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
Nearly two years ago, USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH got a dependency on !PM. Considering that this also implies that the driver is not available e.g. when ACPI is enabled in the kernel that's not far from a dependency on BROKEN. This patch therefore removes this driver. Signed-off-by: Adrian

[2.6 patch] input/serio/hp_sdc.c section fix

2007-10-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
dc_exit (between 'hp_sdc_register' and 'hp_sdc_mlc_init') ... <-- snip --> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- 4022ed345d1b61dc5b6ac0fc35877656e444a11d diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/hp_sdc.c b/drivers/input/serio/hp_sdc.c index 6af1998..02b3ad8 100644 --- a/

[-mm patch] mousedev.c:mixdev_open_devices() bugfix

2007-08-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:06:48AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > Changes since 2.6.23-rc2-mm2: >... > git-input.patch >... > git trees >... This patch fixes an obvious bug in mixdev_open_devices(). Signed-off-by: Adrian B

[2.6 patch] make the dummy touchkit_ps2_detect() static

2007-08-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
The dummy touchkit_ps2_detect() for the CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_TOUCHKIT=n case shouldn't be a global function. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This patch has been sent on: - 14 Aug 2007 --- a/drivers/input/mouse/touchkit_ps2.h +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/touchkit_ps2

Re: [PATCH] Console keyboard events and accessibility

2007-08-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:22:51PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hi, > > Andrew Morton, le Tue 21 Aug 2007 13:02:33 -0700, a écrit : > > On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 02:57:18 +0200 > > Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Some external modules like Speakup need to use the PC keyboard to

[2.6 patch] make the dummy touchkit_ps2_detect() static

2007-08-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
The dummy touchkit_ps2_detect() for the CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_TOUCHKIT=n case shouldn't be a global function. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- 64d15c53e66b200d832a6009aa24c344883bcbcf diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/touchkit_ps2.h b/drivers/input/mouse/touchkit_

Re: [patch 1/3] m68k/mac: Make mac_hid_mouse_emulate_buttons() declaration visible

2007-07-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 02:51:02PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On 7/20/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 01:47:36PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> > Hi Geert, >> > >> > On 7/20/07, Geert Uytterhoeven &l

Re: [patch 1/3] m68k/mac: Make mac_hid_mouse_emulate_buttons() declaration visible

2007-07-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 01:47:36PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Geert, > > On 7/20/07, Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> m68k/mac: Make mac_hid_mouse_emulate_buttons() declaration visible >> >> drivers/char/keyboard.c: In funct

appletouch quirk doesn't run at resume

2007-03-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 11:07:38AM +0100, Thomas Meyer wrote: > Thomas Gleixner schrieb: > > I finally found a dual core box, which survives suspend/resume without > > crashing in the middle of nowhere. Sigh, I never figured out from the > > code and the bug reports what's going on. > > > > The obs

[2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20 that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch of you caused a breakage or I'm considering

[2.6 patch] drivers/hid/hid-debug.c should #include

2007-02-21 Thread Adrian Bunk
Every file should include the headers containing the prototypes for it's global functions. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- --- linux-2.6.20-mm2/drivers/hid/hid-debug.c.old2007-02-20 23:07:32.0 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.20-mm2/drivers/hid/hid-debug.c20