From: Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:47:39 +0100
> I think alsa-user can stay as is. It's no place for dragging many
> other addresses like alsa-devel.
>
> BTW, I also prefer keeping the name [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's been so.
That's fine with me, I've changed it [EMAI
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100
> In fact this thread is the very example: David points out that on netdev
> some of those bugs were already discussed and resolved. Had it been all
> on lkml we'd all be aware of it.
That's a rediculious argument.
One
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:56:57 -0800 (PST)
> The fact that it farts at me every time I post to this thread.
See? I got another one and I have received at least 10 of the
following over the past 2 days.
That's rediculious.
And because a
From: Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:46:24 +0100
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not subscriber-only. Same as that arm list,
> it's _moderated_ for non-subscribers and given that I and other moderators
> have been doing our best to moderate quickly (I tend to stay logged in to
From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:55:07 +
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:55:51PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > I've created [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> By doing so you've just said (implicitly) that you can not tolerate
> someone ha
From: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 06:56:06 +0100
> >
> > > If so, MANITAINERS claims that it is subscribers-only. That would cause
> > > some bug reporters to give up and go away.
> >
> > Find some other mailing list; I'm not hosting *nor* am I willing to run a
> > n
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:27:00 -0800
> Let me just say - I'm astonished at how little spam gets though the vger
> lists. Considering how many times those email addresses must have been
> added to spam databases.
>
> It must be a lot of work, and whoever i
From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:40:33 +
> ARM ep93xx defconfig has been broken since 2.6.23-git1 due to:
>
> drivers/net/arm/ep93xx_eth.c:420: error: implicit declaration of function
> '__netif_rx_schedule_prep'
>
> caused by: [NET]: Make NAPI polling indepe
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:32:01 -0800
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:18:01 + Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Find some other mailing list; I'm not hosting *nor* am I willing to run a
> > non-subscribers only mailing list. Period. Not negotiabl
From: Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:18:43 -0500
> Mind you, no arguing that this is effective when that poor bloke has
> a day free to download the git-tree and build/reboot a dozen times.
Like the internet, this time spent is beneficial because it's
pushing the work out
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:12:59 -0800
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:58:24 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:49:16 -0800
>
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:49:16 -0800
> Do you believe that our response to bug reports is adequate?
Do you feel that making us feel and look like shit helps?
I guess I'm just masterbating here all night long with the 46
bug fixes I've reviewed fully and q
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:15:53 -0800
> > NETWORKING===
> >
> > RTNLGRP_ND_USEROPT does not report ifindex (IPv6)
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9349
> > Kernel: 2.6.24+
>
> No respons
13 matches
Mail list logo
