Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove the USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH driver

2007-10-29 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Alan Stern wrote: > You guys all sound confused about this. The original reason writing for > the onetouch driver was because the button on this disk drive isn't an > HID device! That is, the drive doesn't include any of the usual HID > descriptors for the button and the b

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove the USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH driver

2007-10-29 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Sunday 28 October 2007 16:39, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Torsten Kaiser wrote: > > > > > But it looks like that uses another driver: > > > hiddev0hidraw1: USB HID v1.10 Device [Western Digital External HDD] on > > > usb-:00:02.

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove the USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH driver

2007-10-28 Thread Torsten Kaiser
On 10/29/07, Dmitry Torokhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 28 October 2007 16:39, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Torsten Kaiser wrote: > > > > > But it looks like that uses another driver: > > > hiddev0hidraw1: USB HID v1.10 Device [Western Digital External HDD] on > > > usb-0

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove the USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH driver

2007-10-28 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Sunday 28 October 2007 16:39, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Torsten Kaiser wrote: > > > But it looks like that uses another driver: > > hiddev0hidraw1: USB HID v1.10 Device [Western Digital External HDD] on > > usb-:00:02.1-5.2 > > Otherwise I would be willing to try to test thi

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove the USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH driver

2007-10-28 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Torsten Kaiser wrote: > But it looks like that uses another driver: > hiddev0hidraw1: USB HID v1.10 Device [Western Digital External HDD] on > usb-:00:02.1-5.2 > Otherwise I would be willing to try to test this, if someone would tell > me how to check that the second comm

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove the USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH driver

2007-10-28 Thread Torsten Kaiser
On 10/28/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nearly two years ago, USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH got a dependency on !PM. > Considering that this also implies that the driver is not available > e.g. when ACPI is enabled in the kernel that's not far from a dependency > on BROKEN. > > This patch ther

[RFC: 2.6 patch] remove the USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH driver

2007-10-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
Nearly two years ago, USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH got a dependency on !PM. Considering that this also implies that the driver is not available e.g. when ACPI is enabled in the kernel that's not far from a dependency on BROKEN. This patch therefore removes this driver. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL