Re: [RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

On Dec 16 2015 or thereabouts, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > Hi Jiri, > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > >> > [Apologies for the resend, didn't realize I hadn't changed my GMail > >> > settings > >> > to not

Re: [RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

Hi Benjamin, On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On Dec 16 2015 or thereabouts, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> Hi Jiri, >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: >> > On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Mika Westerberg wrote:

Re: [RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On Dec 17 2015 or thereabouts, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> Hi Benjamin, >> >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Benjamin Tissoires >> wrote: >> > On Dec 16 2015 or thereabouts,

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/8] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - raw data via debugfs

On 02/12/15 20:42, Nick Dyer wrote: > This is a series of patches to add diagnostic data support to the Atmel > maXTouch driver. There's an existing implementation in the open-source mxt-app > tool, however there are performance advantages to moving this code into the > driver. > The algorithm

Re: [RESEND] Lenovo Yoga 900 touchpad issues

On Dec 17 2015 or thereabouts, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Benjamin Tissoires > wrote: > > On Dec 16 2015 or thereabouts, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > >> Hi Jiri, > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Jiri Kosina

Re: [PATCH] Input: don't push static constants on stack for %*ph

> On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 13:41 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> There is no need to pass constants via stack. The width may be >> explicitly >> specified in the format. > > Dmitry, any comments on this? Hi Andy- Just to weigh in on the atmel_mxt_ts part - it's made moot by:

Re: [PATCH 1/1] HID: multitouch: enable palm rejection if device implements confidence usage

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Allen Hung wrote: > >> The usage Confidence is mandary to Windows Precision Touchpad devices. The >> appearance of this usage is checked in hidinput_connect but the quirk >> MT_QUIRK_VALID_IS_CONFIDENCE

Re: [PATCH 1/4] HID: wacom: Limit touchstrip data to 13 bits

I've applied the series to for-4.5/wacom. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] hid-input: ignore the battery in OKLICK Laser BTmouse

On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > This mouse, when asked about the battery, ceases to report movements and > clicks. So just don't ask. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander E. Patrakov Applied to for-4.5/core branch, thanks. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To

Re: [patch] HID: wacom: bitwise vs logical ORs

On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Jason Gerecke wrote: > This patch looks fine to me (the 'prox' calculation /should/ be > logical, but I suppose bitwise works too :D). Found two other bugs > from c7f0522 while reviewing though -- I'll have patches for you > shortly. > > Reviewed-by: Jason Gerecke

iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

[Starting a new thread from https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/663, as now my laptop is displaying values in the sysfs *raw* files.] So I'm trying to understand exactly how the hid-sensor-accel-3d driver works. If I turn up debugging, when I `cat /sys/bus/iio/devices/device*/*raw*`, I see "iio

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 18:33 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas >> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 17:08 -0800, Nish

[PATCH] CHROMIUM: Input: elants_i2c: fixed wake-on-touch issue

From: "james.chen" Something wrong in suspend/resume of kernel v3.14 for the function of wake-on-touch. The function of device_may_wakeup will return true if the device supports wake-on-touch (for example, kitty and buddy). So, modify the code from "if

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 17:07 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada >> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 15:38

Re: [PATCH 1/5] Input: xpad: handle "present" and "gone" correctly

2015-12-15 0:29 GMT+01:00 Dmitry Torokhov : > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:02:39PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 04:31:35PM +0100, Pavel Rojtberg wrote: >> > From: "Pierre-Loup A. Griffais" >> > >> > Handle the "a

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 17:08 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas >> wrote: >> > Hi Andy, >> > >> > As per Nish these

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 18:33 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas > wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 17:08 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas > > >

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

Hi Andy, As per Nish these patches are impacting sensors on Yoga. https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/30/441 Can you help? Thanks, Srinivas On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 16:51 -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 15:38 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > [Starting a new thread from

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 17:08 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas > wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > > > As per Nish these patches are impacting sensors on Yoga. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/30/441 > > To be clear,

Re: [PATCH V4 0/3] Input: goodix - add axis swapping and axis inversion support

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 02:30:19PM +0100, Karsten Merker wrote: > Hello, > > this is v4 of my "Input: goodix - add axis swapping and axis inversion > support" patchset. > > The goodix touchscreen driver has gained device-tree support in kernel > 4.1, but doesn't currently support the

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 15:38 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > [Starting a new thread from https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/663, as > now my laptop is displaying values in the sysfs *raw* files.] > > So I'm trying to understand exactly how the hid-sensor-accel-3d > driver works. > > If I turn up

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 15:38 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> [Starting a new thread from https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/663, as >> now my laptop is displaying values in the sysfs *raw* files.] >>

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote: > Hi Andy, > > As per Nish these patches are impacting sensors on Yoga. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/30/441 To be clear, without that series, the touchpad and touchscreen on the Yoga 900 don't work at

Re: [PATCH v11 0/8] Goodix touchscreen enhancements

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 02:26:33PM +0200, Irina Tirdea wrote: > This patchset depends on Dmitry's patch that fixes the > GPIO ACPI API[1], so devm_gpiod_get_optional can be properly > used in the code. > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/11/465 Applied 1 through 5 (see my goodix branch),

Re: iio/hid-sensor-accel-3d: no output from /dev/iio:device*?

On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 17:07 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada > wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 15:38 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > > [Starting a new thread from https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/663, > >