("gpio: removing gpiochip with gpios still
requested\n");
panic?
NACK to the patch for this reason. The strongest thing you should do
here is WARN.
That said, I am not sure why we need this whole patch set in the first
place.
David Daney
Is this likely to happen?
Gr{o
On 05/29/2014 02:54 PM, abdoulaye berthe wrote:
Did you forget a changelog explaining why this is either needed, or even
a good idea? I joined the conversation late and don't know why you are
doing this.
Thanks,
David Daney
Signed-off-by: abdoulaye berthe
---
arch/arm/common/sc
What benefit do you enjoy by keeping the code out of the upstream kernel?
2) What are the benefits of having a driver for your hardware in the
upstream kernel?
If 2 > 1, then the course of action seems obvious.
Doing nothing because of some perceived impediment doesn't help anybody.
