On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/19/2013 08:53 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> On Monday 12 August 2013 11:29 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 08/12/2013 11:15 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> Device tree files can only include headers in include/dt-bindings.
>>>
On 08/19/2013 08:53 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Monday 12 August 2013 11:29 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/12/2013 11:15 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Device tree files can only include headers in include/dt-bindings.
Eventually/soon, all the DT files and the headers in the dt-b
On Monday 12 August 2013 11:29 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/12/2013 11:15 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Device tree files can only include headers in include/dt-bindings.
Eventually/soon, all the DT files and the headers in the dt-bindings/
directory will be split out into a separate git tree,
On 08/12/2013 11:15 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:25:27AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/08/2013 11:13 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:41:20PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Wednesday 07 August 2013 12:58 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:25:27AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 11:13 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:41:20PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 07 August 2013 12:58 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >>> (CC'ing DT bindings maintainers too, hence quo
On 08/08/2013 11:13 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:41:20PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> On Wednesday 07 August 2013 12:58 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> (CC'ing DT bindings maintainers too, hence quoting a bit of the patch)
>>>
>>> On 08/06/2013 08:12 AM, Laxman Dewangan
On Thursday 08 August 2013 10:43 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:41:20PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Wednesday 07 August 2013 12:58 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
(CC'ing DT bindings maintainers too, hence quoting a bit of the patch)
On 08/06/2013 08:12 AM, Laxman Dewanga
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:41:20PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 August 2013 12:58 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >(CC'ing DT bindings maintainers too, hence quoting a bit of the patch)
> >
> >On 08/06/2013 08:12 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> >>Many of Key device tree bindings uses th
On Wednesday 07 August 2013 12:58 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
(CC'ing DT bindings maintainers too, hence quoting a bit of the patch)
On 08/06/2013 08:12 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Many of Key device tree bindings uses the constant number as key code
which matches with kernel header key code and t
(CC'ing DT bindings maintainers too, hence quoting a bit of the patch)
On 08/06/2013 08:12 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Many of Key device tree bindings uses the constant number as key code
> which matches with kernel header key code and then comment as follows
> for reference/better readability:
Laxman,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:42:49PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Many of Key device tree bindings uses the constant number as key code
> which matches with kernel header key code and then comment as follows
> for reference/better readability:
> linux,code = <102>; /* KEY_HOME */
>
Many of Key device tree bindings uses the constant number as key code
which matches with kernel header key code and then comment as follows
for reference/better readability:
linux,code = <102>; /* KEY_HOME */
Create a DT header which defines all the key code so that DT key bindings
can use
12 matches
Mail list logo
