This patch moves code creating new i2c clients and regmaps to function
drivers which use them. It allows to avoid creating this instances when
individual function drivers are not enabled.
Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga
---
drivers/extcon/extcon-max8997.c | 131 +--
dr
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 10:38 +0100, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> This patch moves code creating new i2c clients and regmaps to function
> drivers which use them. It allows to avoid creating this instances when
> individual function drivers are not enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga
> ---
> dri
Hi Robert,
Is it necessary? If previous mfd driver has various i2c line, previous mfd
driver
initialize regmap/i2c setting on mfd driver.
I'm not sure that regmap/i2c setting code move from mfd driver to each driver.
Dear Lee Jones,
I need your opinion about moving regmap/i2c code from mfd drive
> Is it necessary? If previous mfd driver has various i2c line, previous mfd
> driver
> initialize regmap/i2c setting on mfd driver.
> I'm not sure that regmap/i2c setting code move from mfd driver to each driver.
>
> Dear Lee Jones,
> I need your opinion about moving regmap/i2c code from mfd dri
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:55:04PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Is it necessary? If previous mfd driver has various i2c line, previous mfd
> > driver
> > initialize regmap/i2c setting on mfd driver.
> > I'm not sure that regmap/i2c setting code move from mfd driver to each
> > driver.
> >
> > Dea
Hi,
On 03/13/2014 03:09 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:55:04PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> Is it necessary? If previous mfd driver has various i2c line, previous mfd
>>> driver
>>> initialize regmap/i2c setting on mfd driver.
>>> I'm not sure that regmap/i2c setting code move
> >>> Is it necessary? If previous mfd driver has various i2c line, previous
> >>> mfd driver
> >>> initialize regmap/i2c setting on mfd driver.
> >>> I'm not sure that regmap/i2c setting code move from mfd driver to each
> >>> driver.
> >>>
> >>> Dear Lee Jones,
> >>> I need your opinion about m
