[patch 1/2] HID: sensors: use GFP_ATOMIC under spinlock

2012-09-13 Thread Dan Carpenter
We're holding a spinlock here so we can't call kmalloc() with GFP_KERNEL. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c index 4ac759c..0c93b10 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@

Re: [patch 1/2] HID: sensors: use GFP_ATOMIC under spinlock

2012-09-17 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Dan Carpenter wrote: > We're holding a spinlock here so we can't call kmalloc() with > GFP_KERNEL. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina Jonathan, could you please take this one as well, as it depends on the series in your tree? Thanks. > > diff

RE: [patch 1/2] HID: sensors: use GFP_ATOMIC under spinlock

2012-09-17 Thread Pandruvada, Srinivas
Tested this and works. -Original Message- From: Jiri Kosina [mailto:jkos...@suse.cz] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 3:59 AM To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Pandruvada, Srinivas; linux-input@vger.kernel.org; kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Cameron Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] HID: sensors