John Wendel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone have an agpgart patch for the Intel 820 chipset?
>
> If not, I'll be happy to help if there is some dumbass work.
> I'm sorry I'm not smart enough to do this one myself.
modprobe agpgart agp_try_unsupported=1
--
LarsG
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 07:55:22AM +0200, Henrik Størner wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Christoph Lameter
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >Comparing CD contents with the original after burning showed mismatches 4
> >times in a row. Booted into linux 2.2.18 and everything is fine.
>
> I had
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Christoph Lameter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Comparing CD contents with the original after burning showed mismatches 4
>times in a row. Booted into linux 2.2.18 and everything is fine.
I had quite a few problems burning the Red Hat 7 ISO images while
running
Marty Fouts wrote:
> Factoid: 90% of all patents are never challenged, while 80% of those that
> are are overturned.
In otherwords, 2% of patents are successfully defended, just enough to
keep the serfs in line.
>"Going into court is throwing the dice."
If I am going to throw dice I'd much
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 07:14:44AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
> >
> > The patent attorneys at Malinkrodt received the materials Daniel sent
> > yesterday on the Tux 2 patents via courier and are working on the
> > analysis. They said they would have something for us
"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
>
> The patent attorneys at Malinkrodt received the materials Daniel sent
> yesterday on the Tux 2 patents via courier and are working on the
> analysis. They said they would have something for us to post on LKML
> next week.
I'll calm down and work on my magicpoint
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 22:05:08 -0700
From: Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Compile with -fno-common and you'll get .bss, but not COMMON,
variables. It's the COMMON bits that are screwing your games.
This might be useful to catch people using extern properly
as well.
Later,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 05:25:44PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> These items are specifically placed into the data section, not the
> BSS, because these alignment games are not possible in the BSS.
Compile with -fno-common and you'll get .bss, but not COMMON,
variables. It's the COMMON bits
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 04:30:35PM +0100, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I put a simple construct in kernel/sched.c like this:
>
> struct runq_log_s {
> char comm[16];
> int pid;
> } runq_log[1024*1024];
>
> and the kernel didn't boot. Yes, I understand it is 20M of bss - so
need help getting tapX devices operational on 2.4
for 2.4 using the new tun.o module I cannot create a tap0
interface. on 2.2 it is the ethertap.o module.
changing modules.conf allows the module to load but the
interface does not come up:
ifconfig tap0 192.168.0.10 up
SIOCSIFADDR: No such
Andi Kleen wrote:
> As far as I can see (from reading fs/hpfs/*) HPFS uses a btree (or perhaps
> b*tree) on disk.
For what: Directory? Data Index? Allocation Map? All of the above?
--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 22:20:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Final patch with feedback from Henner to change the naming
convention of the return codes. Clean it up, polish it, junk it
etc.
Jamal, I have no problems with these changes I think.
Could you resend me a
Martin Pool wrote:
>
> I worked on something similar to tuxfs a while ago:
>
> http://linuxcare.com.au/projects/snapfs/
>
> This does clash with the patent claims and it was done only a couple
> of years ago, so it's no direct use as prior art. I do agree about
> software patents: once one
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 02:13:45AM +0200, Martin Diehl wrote:
> So, for me the 2.4.0-test9 behavior does not only differ from 2.2 and what
> manpages say - I'm just wondering how to detect the unreachable peer port?
> poll()-timeout means no response at all, which is sth different and forces
>
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
> Nope. Doesn't have to be a symlink - it can be a directory. Overmounted by
> bind-mount - you can mount over a mountpoint.
And do a mount onto it while the kernel is waiting for revalidation? I'm
sorry, but that makes it even more dependent on the
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000 01:19:16 +0200,
Jamie Lokier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>David S. Miller wrote:
>>> These items are specifically placed into the data section, not the
>>> BSS, because these alignment games are not possible in the BSS.
>>
>>That would mean the BSS needs support
Date:Fri, 6 Oct 2000 01:19:16 +0200
From: Jamie Lokier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Put __attribute__ ((section (".data"))) into __tcp_clean_cacheline_pad
and it should do what you want.
Heck, section ".bss" might give you the alignment without the allocation
but I'm not as
Forward the document to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regarding patents, for
prior art to be valid it has to have been "reduced to practice" (the
legal term). That means it has to have been implemented and the theory
demonstrated. There's no real requirement under US Patent Law that it
be shipped, turned
The patent attorneys at Malinkrodt received the materials Daniel sent
yesterday on the Tux 2 patents via courier and are working on the
analysis. They said they would have something for us to post on LKML
next week.
Jeff
Alain Williams wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I remember when at the University
From: "Alan Curry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:03:55 -0500 (EST)
3. Does anybody know where to file a bug report on the Sega
Dreamcast TCP?
Eventually it should reach Microsoft, since if I remember correctly
the dreamcast uses their networking stack.
Thus spake Harald Dunkel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Maybe a stupid question, but it would be nice to know what this
> message means:
>
> fright kernel: svc: unknown program 100227 (me 13)
>
> 'fright' is the name of the machine in question (2.4.0-test6, x86).
> I get this about 40 times
It's not majodomo. It's somone who is subscribed to the list bouncing
things back. Could be a broken mail to news gateway or some other mis
scripted feature. Read the mail headers and you can see fairly quickly who
is responsable.
Gerhard
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
>
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>the latest UP-APIC patch against 2.4.0-test9 (upapic-2.4.0-test9-F5), can
>be downloaded from:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mingo/apic-patches/
>
>this one should work on all systems - let me know how it behaves, reports,
Ted,
..
..
4. Boot Time Failures
..
Boot hangs on a range of Dell docking stations (Latitude)
Almost certainly related: PCI code doesn't see devices behind
DECchip 21150 PCI bridges
(used in Dell Latitude). Reported by Simon Trimmer . (Patch from
Martin Mares exists but
I have attached a few details of what appears to be a PCI resource alloc
problem (IO ports from the look of it).
Note: This is on a dell lattitude machine that never booted before
with a docked setup.
Enjoy!
cheers,
jamal
pci.list.gz
Hi,
I remember when at the University of Cambridge (in England) about 25 years ago
seeing some work then about the Jackdaw (or was is Jackard) database system
that had the great feature of being immune to OS crashes, it used a phased
update mechanism where new blocks were written to disk and the
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Jeff Nguyen wrote:
>Hi Alan.
>
>I hope you will consider to integrate Andre IDE patche into the 2.2.18 or
>2.2.19 kernel.
Be advised that the big IDE patch for 2.2 (at least as of a month ago)
contains a backport of the 2.4 ide-tape driver. That driver is BROKEN --
if the
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:46:13AM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
> usb audio will be made to work again, but it's
> currently broken 2 ways: usb-uhci was just broken
> in 2.4.0-test9.
Oh? It works perfectly well with my Wacom Graphire.
> Besides that, the audio driver
> has been broken since
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Harald Welte wrote:
>> It was suggested to me that the way to make hdparm settings permanent was
>> to create a script to change the settings on startup. Is this the best
>> choice?
>
>Yes, indeed. It is the same for all kernel configurable parameters. Look
>at
> From: Erik Mouw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:46:13AM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
> > usb audio will be made to work again, but it's
> > currently broken 2 ways: usb-uhci was just broken
> > in 2.4.0-test9.
>
> Oh? It works perfectly well with my Wacom Graphire.
David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Okay, twice this evening I've seen my 2.2.16-kernel based i586 (K6-2)
> > machine become ignorant of the utility of eth0. Both times I'd been
> > playing mp3 audio on another linux box from an NFS volume served by
> > the machine that went
Hi,
Does anyone have an agpgart patch for the Intel 820 chipset?
If not, I'll be happy to help if there is some dumbass work.
I'm sorry I'm not smart enough to do this one myself.
Thanks,
John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> the latest UP-APIC patch against 2.4.0-test9 (upapic-2.4.0-test9-F5), can
> be downloaded from:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mingo/apic-patches/
>
> this one should work on all systems - let me know how it behaves, reports,
> suggestions welcome.
David,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is not answering the "lists" test with a
reply. The server shows to be up at 199.183.24.194, and nslookup
reports:
[root@vger /]#
[root@vger /]# nslookup -querytype=mx vger.kernel.org
Server: slkcpop1.slkc.uswest.net
Address: 206.81.128.1
Non-authoritative answer:
David S. Miller wrote:
>> These items are specifically placed into the data section, not the
>> BSS, because these alignment games are not possible in the BSS.
>
>That would mean the BSS needs support alignment games.
>
> The problem is it doesn't work, please go try it.
> So until
or two versions of
your patch: the early version patch-bonding-2.2.17.gz (defaults to MII
link monitoring and does not include optimized transmit path) and the
latest version I got during the time we were doing the tests --
patch-bonding-20001005.gz.
TEST RESULTS.
Hardware:
Machine 1: IBM Tnink
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
> Fix your /etc/nsswitch.conf to not try to use NIS/NIS+ if you
> do not have these services available.
Yes, of course you are right - incorrect nsswitch.conf will reveal this
problem too - but:
No, the issue I've tried to demonstrate with my
Philip J. Mucci wrote:
> Basically, reading the counters is a 2 step process: read the mmapped
> virtual counters and add that to the contents of rdpmc(). This means
> that (at least for the x86 series) the kernel interface only needs to
> 'guard' access to the MSR to make sure the user doesn't
Usually, when I try to connect to a port with nothing listening on it, it
looks like this:
17:11:20.809712 eth0 > MYHOST.2514 > OTHERHOST.auth: S 2807001202:2807001202(0) win
32120 (DF)
17:11:20.819712 eth0 < OTHERHOST.auth > MYHOST.2514: R 0:0(0) ack 2807001203 win 0
MYHOST is my Linux box.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One big argument against RAS of any sort is that it bloats the kernel and
> not every one wants it (until they have a problem). A further argument with
> Linux is that you may have to do quite a bit of hard work to get the subset
> of RAS you need to co-exist, if it
Alexander Viro wrote:
> ITYM "cute". As in "cute dancing paperclip". As colourized ls.
Hey, colour ls is _useful_!
> Or --ignore-fail-on-non-empty as rmdir option. Or "let's replace config
> files with directories full of one-liners since packagers can't be arsed
> to learn sed(1)" religion.
Hi,
My driver needs to do a large DMA in the user address. Is there a way i can
ensure the user buffer is not swapped out, while i am doing the IO.
Please CC your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TIA
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Ralph Blach wrote:
>
> I am working with the monta-vista port of linux to the 405gp.
>
> arch/ppc/mm/4xx_tlb.o: In function `findPTE':
> /u/rcblach/405/2.4.0-test2/arch/ppc/mm/4xx_tlb.c:507: undefined
> reference to `pgd_none'
> /u/rcblach/405/2.4.0-test2/arch/ppc/mm/4xx_tlb.c:507: relocation
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 09:27:56PM +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > " " == David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Oh, by the way, is there ANY sane reason whatsoever behind the
> > decision that the Linux NFSv3 client in the v2.2.18pre15 kernel
> > defaults to
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:33:30AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> A power failure might leave you with a corrupt disk block. That is
> detectable (read failure) and you may then reconstruct it using the
> rest of the stripe. This will get you data from either before
> or after the update was
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> The list has been experiencing loop via somebody.
> The likely suspect is now deleted from the list, and
> it remains to be seen if that helped.
from a looping message:
> X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 09:39:11AM +1300, Craig Whitmore wrote:
> I need to set up a server with a user that is in more than 32 groups at a time
> and as far as I know NGROUPS_MAX in limits.h changes this maximum.
> If I increase (say to 256) this will this break anything or will linux work
++ 05/10/00 21:17 +0200 - Torben Mathiasen:
> I have the same problems, thought it was because my resubscription went
> wrong.
Sorry, I caused this problem. The repeated messages were send out by a mail
processing script I've actually been using for quite some time, but
demonstrated to contain
Fix your /etc/nsswitch.conf to not try to use NIS/NIS+ if you
do not have these services available.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
Comparing CD contents with the original after burning showed mismatches 4
times in a row. Booted into linux 2.2.18 and everything is fine.
Together with the events of freezing in pine I would suggest that there is
something in the kernel scribbling memory.
I am back to 2.2 for good for now.
The card is a DLink DFE 530TX:
via-rhine.c:v1.01 2/27/99 Written by Donald Becker
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/via-rhine.html
eth0: VIA VT3043 Rhine at 0xe000, 00:50:ba:a5:5f:e6, IRQ 5.
eth0: MII PHY found at address 8, status 0x782d advertising 05e1 Link 40a1.
PCI latency
I'm still trying to read physical sectors, and have made progress. Thanks
for the pointers on set_blocksize(), that seems to do the trick.
However, now I've got another problem. When I read blocks "too quickly", I
guess the elevator algorithm in ll_rw_block() kicks in and re-organizes my
>From the header, looks like several folks are responsible.
Jeff
Gerhard Mack wrote:
>
> It's not majodomo. It's somone who is subscribed to the list bouncing
> things back. Could be a broken mail to news gateway or some other mis
> scripted feature. Read the mail headers and you can see
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is sick and is sending messages in a circle.
Better check the /etc/aliases file and make sure a record isn't pointing
somewhere it should not.
Jeff
[Fwd: Returned mail: Too many hops 29 (25 max): from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> via vger.kernel.org, to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
The
Hi folks,
Maybe a stupid question, but it would be nice to know what this
message means:
fright kernel: svc: unknown program 100227 (me 13)
'fright' is the name of the machine in question (2.4.0-test6, x86).
I get this about 40 times per day.
Many thanx
Harri
-
To unsubscribe
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 09:17:14PM +0200, Torben Mathiasen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05 2000, Post, Mark K wrote:
> > I don't know if anyone else is seeing this, but I'm getting multiple copies
> > of a lot of the emails to this list. For some, it's two copies, for others
> > it is up to four copies.
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> I tried to compile Jeff's i810_rng driver statically and I can't because
> of a construct like this:
>
> if (GET_USE_COUNT(THIS_MODULE) > 0)
> MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT;
> if (GET_USE_COUNT(THIS_MODULE)
Hello,
> Pardon my ignorance, but:
>
> Can anyone point me to a quick explaination of what
> kmem_grow: Called nonatomically from int - size-64
> means or what to look for when you see something like this?
>
> I'm guessing size-64 is from the slab allocator... so kmalloc() or
> something is
Hi Keith,
I tried to compile Jeff's i810_rng driver statically and I can't because
of a construct like this:
if (GET_USE_COUNT(THIS_MODULE) > 0)
MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT;
if (GET_USE_COUNT(THIS_MODULE) == 0)
rng_hw_enabled
> " " == David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, by the way, is there ANY sane reason whatsoever behind the
> decision that the Linux NFSv3 client in the v2.2.18pre15 kernel
> defaults to wsize = rsize = 1kB and the NFSv3 client in
> v2.4.0test9 defaults to
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few bss changes (to remove zero initialization) in test9 were not
> completly correct. Init data must be initialized if you want that it gets
> into the init section (it's also mentioned in the gcc documentation).
> The following patch fixes
On Thu, Oct 05 2000, Post, Mark K wrote:
> I don't know if anyone else is seeing this, but I'm getting multiple copies
> of
> a lot of the emails to this list. For some, it's two copies, for others it
> is up
> to four copies. Am I the only one seeing this?
>
I have the same problems, thought
Hi,
A few bss changes (to remove zero initialization) in test9 were not
completly correct. Init data must be initialized if you want that it gets
into the init section (it's also mentioned in the gcc documentation).
The following patch fixes what I was able to find with grep and also adds
a note
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 09:54:25AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Very strange, I'll beat on this some more today and try to see what's
> up.
I tried this .config on test9 final last night and didn't have any
problems.
Could you see if this is still a problem with test9?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
Hello,
> I don't know if anyone else is seeing this, but I'm getting multiple copies
> of
> a lot of the emails to this list. For some, it's two copies, for others it
> is up
> to four copies. Am I the only one seeing this?
No, I've got the same problem...
--
Sven Krohlas, | __o
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Michael Meding wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> just a side note. It is recommended that you use the mga.o from dri tree
> anyway...
> not the one from the kernel tree. That won't help much about the
> underlying problem with the loading order but since there is no way to
> compile
Eric,
usb audio will be made to work again, but it's
currently broken 2 ways: usb-uhci was just broken
in 2.4.0-test9.
Besides that, the audio driver
has been broken since 2.4.0-test7 or so.
It worked in 2.4.0-test5 but not in -test7.
I've been searching for the problem but haven't
found it
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 02:40:01PM -0400, Post, Mark K wrote:
> I don't know if anyone else is seeing this, but I'm getting multiple copies
> of
> a lot of the emails to this list. For some, it's two copies, for others it
> is up
> to four copies. Am I the only one seeing this?
No, somebody
Hello Mark , I can confirm the (Very) recent start of some
duplicates showing up . 4 for one message , 2 for another .
Hth , JimL
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Post, Mark K wrote:
> I don't know if anyone else is seeing this, but I'm getting multiple copies
> of
> a
I don't know if anyone else is seeing this, but I'm getting multiple copies
of
a lot of the emails to this list. For some, it's two copies, for others it
is up
to four copies. Am I the only one seeing this?
Mark Post
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Hi all,
I just got a "Target USB speaker converter", which is basically a
USB sound card. I opened the case and found a Philips UDA1321PS
chip, which seems to be the same chip as used in the Philips
DSS 330 USB speakers, according to the linux-usb pages[1].
However, if I connect it to my laptop,
Hello
Same problem wit test9-pre kernels (duno when this started, but test8
seems to be fine, and pre9-final is compiling now)
For me it locked up in pine, just after sending an Email, but not always.
(and sure i had to retype my emails serveral times)
And yes my mailfolders are large (may be
Great start. To complete it we need some info on the read/write
interface. Is it the same as for other drivers? I have heard that read
is called once after returning an EOF. Is this so? I suppose there are
other interfaces also, e.g. ioctl, etc.
George
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Oct
Hi there,
just a side note. It is recommended that you use the mga.o from dri tree
anyway...
not the one from the kernel tree. That won't help much about the
underlying problem with the loading order but since there is no way to
compile the mga.o in from the dri tree the problem itself vanishes
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, George Anzinger wrote:
> Where is the internal interface to procfs documented?
There is no documentation for the -exported- procfs interface as far as
I know. As for internal interfaces, who knows what you are asking...
Here's a rough outline: (maybe somebody should clean
Pardon my ignorance, but:
Can anyone point me to a quick explaination of what
kmem_grow: Called nonatomically from int - size-64
means or what to look for when you see something like this?
I'm guessing size-64 is from the slab allocator... so kmalloc() or
something is being called incorrectly
Where is the internal interface to procfs documented?
George
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, RAJESH BALAN wrote:
> Hi,
> Iam interested in learning linux kernel. Can anyone
> suggest a really good book for kernel internals (im
> not bothered abt the price). i 've a book named
> "linux kernel internals". i want something more to
> follow the code completely.
> tx,
>
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, RAJESH BALAN wrote:
> Hi,
> Iam interested in learning linux kernel. Can anyone
> suggest a really good book for kernel internals (im
> not bothered abt the price). i 've a book named
> "linux kernel internals". i want something more to
> follow the code completely.
> tx,
>
Hi Linus,
Two patches for 2.4.0test9 configuration follow.
1. I found two bugs in configuration utilities:
- Menuconfig doesn't ignore commented out "endmenu" commands (while
commented out "mainmenu_option" it does). I don't think it is
intentional... Especially as it breaks s390
On Thu, Oct 05 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> * return value from pci_module_init and TLan_EisaProbe is never checked.
> If you don't care about the return value, just remove 'rc' var.
>
I was going to have some code here, but haven't had the time. I'll
remove it.
> * does TLan_EisaProbe work? It
Hi,
Iam interested in learning linux kernel. Can anyone
suggest a really good book for kernel internals (im
not bothered abt the price). i 've a book named
"linux kernel internals". i want something more to
follow the code completely.
tx,
rajesh balan
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Eric Lowe wrote:
> Agreed. I ran into the same problem myself, but I figured you probably
> didn't break it. Would be nice to see it fixed though, I'm trying
> to help debug the new VM on that machine that just so happens to use
> that chipset, and it's hard to do that when
Hello,
> I did not change it and I have yet to get a good reason from the person
> who did. I have explained why it was wrong to change, but I guess things
> will have to start crashing again when Linus accepts changes that I never
> looked at or discussed.
>
> Take it up with ManDrake Linux
On Thu, Oct 05 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Please include your patches inline so we can easily quote them via the
> standard e-mail reply feature.
>
> i2o_block.c: you don't need EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS (yes, I know it was there
> before)
I' remove it.
> sg.c: ug. the worst part of the patch. you
Please include your patches inline so we can easily quote them via the
standard e-mail reply feature.
i2o_block.c: you don't need EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS (yes, I know it was there
before)
sd.c: why do you add two blank lines, but change nothing else?
sg.c: ug. the worst part of the patch. you
Linus,
This patch is a resend of my other link fix patch that didn't get
in test9-pre9. I assume this is because of some other changes
to upper layer scsi drivers.
This patch is a lot smaller because the "moving files around" part
has been omittet.
So please apply this patch and do the
> > Which is a bunch of bullsh*t. i have an Adaptec 39160 and it works
> > beautifully. With regards to the docs, i found this under the
> > "Supported cards/chipsets" section around line 42 of
> > drivers/scsi/README.aic7xxx (in both 2.4.0 and 2.2.17):
> >
> > AHA-29160M
>
>
As tigran mentions, you should not explicitly zero static vars.
You need to ask yourself if TLAN will -ever- be used in a hotplug
situation, ie. do you find TLAN hardware on CardBus or PCMCIA cards?
If no, you should:
s/__devinit/__init/
s/__devexit/__exit/
If yes, you have
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:38:26AM -0400, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 04:58:39PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > Using the NFSv3 server in the v2.4.0test9 kernel (I haven't tested any
> > earlier v2.3.xx or v2.4.0testx kernels) I'm having problems with
> > (for instance)
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 04:58:39PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> Using the NFSv3 server in the v2.4.0test9 kernel (I haven't tested any
> earlier v2.3.xx or v2.4.0testx kernels) I'm having problems with
> (for instance) compile glib.
>
> The setups I've tried are:
>
> wsize = rsize = 1kB
>
> > Based on what I've been able to find out on the net, it
> > appears that the support of the Adaptec 29160 is not complete
> > (optimal?), but because the card works in a degraded mode with the
> > current driver, there haven't been many complaints.
> >
> > A recent benchmark in Open
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Okay, twice this evening I've seen my 2.2.16-kernel based i586 (K6-2)
> machine become ignorant of the utility of eth0. Both times I'd been
> playing mp3 audio on another linux box from an NFS volume served by
> the machine that went nuts.
Let me guess - eth0 is a
Linus,
This patch includes the following:
Fixes the timer being added twice bug (on tytso's list)
Convertes driver to new PCI layout
Adds support for EISA based TLAN adapters.
Patch has been tested for over a month now and is ready for 2.4.
Against final test9.
--
(Not subscribed to linux-kernel. Please cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Okay, twice this evening I've seen my 2.2.16-kernel based i586 (K6-2)
machine become ignorant of the utility of eth0. Both times I'd been
playing mp3 audio on another linux box from an NFS volume served by
the machine that went
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 03:46:10PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Good! I hope to meet you next week at ALS as I'm giving a pitch on DProbes
> next Thursday. When is your session?
I'm using it successfully after a quick port to 2.4. Very nice work.
>
> The P-tree by the way is
On Thu Oct 05, 2000 at 02:09:24PM +0200, Meelis Roos wrote:
> 2.2.18pre12 detects Duron 600 almost fine (even reports 64K cache) but
> fails to identify some cpu flags (6, 14, 17). /proc/cpuinfo output:
>
I see the same thing on my Athlon. Funny I never noticed
it before...
andersen@slag:~$
Using the NFSv3 server in the v2.4.0test9 kernel (I haven't tested any
earlier v2.3.xx or v2.4.0testx kernels) I'm having problems with
(for instance) compile glib.
The setups I've tried are:
wsize = rsize = 1kB
Linux NFSv3 server --> Linux NFSv3 client (UDP mounted) -- WORKS
wsize = rsize =
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 02:09:24PM +0200, Meelis Roos wrote:
> 2.2.18pre12 detects Duron 600 almost fine (even reports 64K cache) but
> fails to identify some cpu flags (6, 14, 17). /proc/cpuinfo output:
According to the documentation I have,
6PAE
14 Machine Check
> Looking at the trace, I can see the cpu wasn't actually doing
> anything when it crashed. Well, an interrupt occured, and that
> apparently is fatal on my machine. Now I wonder why.
It's easy to explain the crash:
> >>EIP: Trace: c01127ae
Someone called add_timer with either an
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
