Matthew Dharm wrote:
I'm not sure this is correct -- the options that this if conditional
controls are the Keyboard and Mouse _Boot_Protocol_ support, which is
separate form the regular HID support -- I believe it's for motherboards
which can boot from a USB keyboard.
Can somone on the
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 04:17:01PM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
. OOPS in usb-storage from the error-recovery handler. {CRITICAL}
(Matthew Dharm; [EMAIL PROTECTED])
This is fixed as of test9.
Matt
--
Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maintainer, Linux USB
"Dunlap, Randy" wrote:
snip
Then if you select USB HID support, that builds the hid driver,
which handles mice, keyboards, joysticks, gamepads, speaker
buttons, any-old-kind-of buttons, toaster buttons, etc.
OTOH, if you want just some basic USB mouse keyboard support,
you don't have to
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000 15:29:53 +0200, Lars Callenbach blurted forth:
Hallo,
I´m trying the 2.4-9 kernel and sometimes it crashes. I haven´t found any hint for
the crashes but I´ve got messages like the following one in /var/log/messages:
[snip]
Perhaps someone can explain what happens,
Mitchell Blank Jr writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. Boot Time Failures
[...]
* IBM Thinkpad 390 won't boot since 2.3.11 (See Decklin Foster for
more info)
I _highly_ suspect that this is not a 2.4 bug but is instead user error.
I've seen it several times.
snip
You are
First, my apologies for an OT request here. We recently upgraded one of
our machines here to a Duron 700Mhz running on a QDI mainboard, and haven't
been able to get a few recent Linux distros to install reasonably on it.
RH6.2 installs but chokes constantly whenever we exit the X-server
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 05:19:37PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote:
I'm not sure this is correct -- the options that this if conditional
controls are the Keyboard and Mouse _Boot_Protocol_ support, which is
separate form the regular HID support -- I believe it's for motherboards
which can boot from a
Dear.
I use linux-2.0.39-pre8, and work fine.
I wait for releasing linux-2.0.39,
when do relese linux-2.0.39?
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 10:08:13AM +0900, Seiichi Nakashima wrote:
Dear.
I use linux-2.0.39-pre8, and work fine.
I wait for releasing linux-2.0.39,
when do relese linux-2.0.39?
Well, I'm still investigating some problems that some users are
experiencing. However, if I can't resolve those
Hi there,
redhat 6.2 will (should) install on this system. Maybe you have to use
the upgraded driver / update disk and maybe you have to use text
install. However, the installed kernel will fail during boot because it
tries to disable the cpuid serial number on your system (of course there
isn't
whoops. Here's a resend with the actual patch attached. :)
one of those days I guess?
Attached is a patch to include 3dfx voodoo5 framebuffer support.
Looking for comments.
Doesn't do much other than check for the voodoo5 device id. It also
doesn't do anything voodoo5 specific. (voodoo5 is
Hence, yes I can provide an interface from the kernel to log a trace event
with a variable length buffer, but I don't think that taking away the
statically
defined trace points is the right thing to do. (I might have gotten this
completely wrong, though ... My presumption about your suggestion
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 00:19:20 -0700
From: Richard Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seems to me that if you want to play games and be sure that they
stay played, that you'd have to put all the variables into a
struct.
Indeed, I've hacked this up and will send the fix to linus.
Later,
This has suddenly started happening tonight. Also happens with test9
and test10-pre1 but they lock-up hard, to the extent that Atl-SysRQ+B is
needed, box doesn't respond to pings etc.
The only thing that's changed recently is the addition of a new PS/2
keyboard.
My first Oops report so
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Jochen Striepe wrote:
Hi, a question regarding the OOM process killer...
Hmm, sometimes daemon-like processes (e.g. web servers) only need root
privileges to open a network port1024 - you may start them as non-root
if they do not need such a privileged port. Might be
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 09:25:38PM -0400, Byron Stanoszek wrote:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Jochen Striepe wrote:
What about a user-defined list of "wishes"? The administrator should be
enabled to enforce that specific processes are to be terminated only as a
last resource (syslogd), or that
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Matthew Dharm wrote:
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 09:25:38PM -0400, Byron Stanoszek wrote:
echo "init" /proc/sys/oom-ignore
echo "httpd" /proc/sys/oom-ignore
echo "parallel-fft" /proc/sys/oom-ignore
etc...
I'd be concerned with the security implications of this
Dear.
I use linux-2.0.39-pre8, and work fine.
I wait for releasing linux-2.0.39,
when do relese linux-2.0.39?
Well, I'm still investigating some problems that some users are
experiencing. However, if I can't resolve those within a reasonable
time, I'll release v2.0.39.
how about registering the full path (or inode number of the executable?),
the owner, and an optional high water mark of memory consumption, over
which the process is considered to be leaking memory and gets added to the
algorithm of processes to kill? this is because while normally i want to
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how about registering the full path (or inode number of the executable?),
the owner, and an optional high water mark of memory consumption, over
which the process is considered to be leaking memory and gets added to the
algorithm of processes to
Then if you select USB HID support, that builds the hid driver,
which handles mice, keyboards, joysticks, gamepads, speaker
buttons, any-old-kind-of buttons, toaster buttons, etc.
OTOH, if you want just some basic USB mouse keyboard support,
you don't have to use the hid driver, you
Hi Linus
I just resend this patch (the first time I forgot to put the
[PATCH] field). It fixes a leak in swapon reported by marcelo
quite time ago.
Later, Juan.
"marcelo" == Marcelo de Paula Bezerra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
sorry for the delay (this problem has been
(but I'd be curious if somebody actually manages to
trick the OOM killer into killing init ... please
test a bit more to see if this really happens ;))
In a non-real-world situation, yes. (mem=3500k, many drivers, init=/bin/bash,
tried to enter a command). Since the process in question
Periodically, I get the following error with the 2.4.0test9 kernel:
spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7.
I did not receive this error with the 2.0.36 kernel that came stock on my
slack installation. However, 2 things have been changed; I configured the
PAS16 to use IRQ7 (I don't recall its exact
Hi,
I want to setup RAID.
I am working on kernel version 2.2.12.
I am using RAID patches available.
I create a RAID configuring file called
/etc/raidtab
#mkraid /dev/md0/*md0 is the device I am
selecting*/
After this when I check /proc/mdstat , I find
Rik van Riel wrote:
How about SIGTERM a bit before SIGKILL then re-evaluate the OOM
N usecs later?
And run the risk of having to kill /another/ process as well ?
I really don't know if that would be a wise thing to do
(but feel free to do some tests to see if your idea would
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:21:48 +0200
From: Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We will see who feels responsible for adding it to the kernel
source. Alexey? Andi? Davem? Alan?
I have applied the fix, and will send it to Linus.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:Andre Hedrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
Is there a limit?
I keep getting barfs on an iso9960 image 4,592,353,280 of this size.
Basically I am burning DVD's at 4.7GB tests before patching the kernel
before 2.4 for expanded
501 - 528 of 528 matches
Mail list logo
