sample /sbin/hotplug script

2000-11-27 Thread David Brownell
I've been quite pleased to see many recent improvement in hotplug support ... 2.4 test11 is now hotplugging USB network adapters for me when I need that! And many other devices at least get their driver modules autoloaded (using modutils support) even if some devices still need hand setup before

2.2.18pre23 hang

2000-11-27 Thread Hans-Joachim Baader
Hi, I had 4 hangs of my server in the last days. The first was with 2.2.18pre17, compiled with gcc 2.95.2. The next two were with 2.2.18pre23, compiled with gcc 2.95.2. Then I recompiled with gcc 2.7.2.3 and had another hang. Unfortunately there are no logs or oopses. The machine was just dead.

/proc/fb

2000-11-27 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Jorge, In linux-2.4.0-test12-pre2/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt, you wrote: | fb Frame Buffer devices (2.4) This entry existed in 2.2 as well. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven

proc_fs Howto for 2.2.X?

2000-11-27 Thread Andreas Tobler
Hi, Is there a paper around which describes the use of the proc_fs in the actual 2.2.17 and up kernels? All I have is the Rubini book which is a bit aged regarding the proc_fs, and this guide: http://www.ibiblio.org/mdw/LDP/lkmpg/mpg.html. Also a bit dated. Exactly what I'm looking for is an exp

Question on vmalloc() memory management

2000-11-27 Thread Justin Schoeman
Hi everybody, I would just like to find out if there is any real reason why there are no memory management functions for handling vmalloc()ed memory. If you have a look at bttv.c, you will see definitions of: kvirt_to_pa (translate a vmalloc()ed address to a page number) rvmalloc (malloc and ma

2.4.0-test12-pre2 -- Broken build. Many definitions redefined

2000-11-27 Thread Miles Lane
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=i686 -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c sys.cIn file included from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/wait.h:19, from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/fs.h:12,

Re: test-10 tulip "eth0 timed out" (smp, heavy IDE use)

2000-11-27 Thread Jacob Luna Lundberg
> > Linksys LNE version 4, 00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Bridgecom, Inc: > > Unknown device 0985 (rev 11) [...] > > Nov 28 04:04:52 twoey kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out > > Nov 28 04:04:52 twoey kernel: eth0: Transmit timed out, status fc664010, > > CSR12 , resetting...

Re: A20 gate (was: KERNEL BUG: console not working in linux)

2000-11-27 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:"Dunlap, Randy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Just curious: Are you (Alan?) saying this ("standard") based on the > unpublished IBM PC specs (well, it was when I needed it around > 1990; don't know about now ???). Or do you

Re: test12-pre2

2000-11-27 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Neil Brown wrote: > > What happens about the stuff that went in to 2.4.0test11-ac{1,2,3,4}? > Are you going to "sync-up" with Alan, or should we send bits directly > to you? Either, or both. Alan feeds me his patches in small chunks anyway, and does a good job of keeping

Re: test-10 tulip "eth0 timed out" (smp, heavy IDE use)

2000-11-27 Thread Andre Hedrick
Toby, Nothing can be done without the full re-write of the driver. The global request_io_lock is slammed into play way to early and release way to late. You will have to suffer with this flaw until the spin of 2.5. We are talking about a rewrite that is still at least 60 days from being ready

Re: 2.4.0-test11-ac2 and ac4 SMP will not run KDE 2.0

2000-11-27 Thread Steven Cole
Alan Cox wrote: > >> For what its worth, on my single processor home machine, all kernels >> 2.4.0-test11-ac1,ac2,ac3, ac4 both UP and SMP run both Gnome and >> KDE 2.0, with reiserfs-3.6.19. In other words, everything works with >> everything. > >Nod. It actually puzzles me since from the kernel

Re: Questions about Kernel 2.4.0.?

2000-11-27 Thread Android
- Original Message - From: Android To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 2:20 PM Subject: Questions about Kernel 2.4.0.? 1) There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11: build->/usr/src/linux created by the Makefile (make modules_install).

test-10 tulip "eth0 timed out" (smp, heavy IDE use)

2000-11-27 Thread Toby Jaffey
Using 2.4-test10 I got a series of timeout errors on my tulip network card (Linksys LNE version 4, 00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Bridgecom, Inc: Unknown device 0985 (rev 11)). Networking then completely stopped working. Restarting the interface with ifconfig fixed the problem. I am using an SMP ke

Fasttrak 100 configuration

2000-11-27 Thread James Lamanna
So I'm trying to get the Promise Fasttrack 100 driver included with 2.4.0-test10 to work on my system. I have 2 45GB drives hooked up in RAID0. I'm trying to install directly onto the drives, but I'm having a couple problems. It seems to detect the controller card and the drives, but they are not

Re: test12-pre2

2000-11-27 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
Congrats Linus! Which part of the kernel is dedicated to Celeste? =P Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Due to the birth of my third daughter last week (yes, I got /.'ed), if you > sent me patches that aren't in pre2, you can pretty much consider them > lost. -- ==

Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"

2000-11-27 Thread Michael Meissner
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:35:45PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 12:10:33PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > If you have two files: > > > test1.c: > > > int a,b,c; > > > > > > test2.c: > > > int a,c; > > > >

RE: KERNEL BUG: console not working in linux

2000-11-27 Thread Dunlap, Randy
Hi, I've been taking some holidays and haven't followed all of this thread closely, but: > From: Albert D. Cahalan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > H. Peter Anvin writes: > > [Albert Cahalan] > >> [Alan Cox] > > 1) Why did they disable my videocard ? > >>> > >>> Because your machine is not

Re: test12-pre2

2000-11-27 Thread Alan Cox
> > Due to the birth of my third daughter last week (yes, I got /.'ed), if you > > sent me patches that aren't in pre2, you can pretty much consider them > > lost. > > > > Linus > > > > What happens about the stuff that went in to 2.4.0test11-ac{1,2,3,4}? > Are you going to "sync-up

Linus daughter

2000-11-27 Thread John B. Jacobsen
> > Oh, well. Some people saw the (unannounced, and not for public > consumption) pre1, so here's pre2. pre1 was just meant to be an interim > patch to sync up with the ISDN patches. > > Due to the birth of my third daughter last week (yes, I got /.'ed), if you > sent me patches that aren't in p

Re: test12-pre2

2000-11-27 Thread Neil Brown
On Monday November 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Oh, well. Some people saw the (unannounced, and not for public > consumption) pre1, so here's pre2. pre1 was just meant to be an interim > patch to sync up with the ISDN patches. > > Due to the birth of my third daughter last week (yes, I got /

RE: out of swap

2000-11-27 Thread Kevin Krieser
> What would I like it to do? Warn me maybe before my swap goes to > zero. Kill the > program that is doing this possibly. Allow me to set a per > process memory / swap > limit so that no one process can suck up my system resources. > There are several programs available with the typical Linu

Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"

2000-11-27 Thread Alexander Viro
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 12:10:33PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If you have two files: > > test1.c: > > int a,b,c; > > > > test2.c: > > int a,c; > > > > Which is _stronger_? > > Those won't link together as they aren't declared static. T

Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"

2000-11-27 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 12:10:33PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If you have two files: > test1.c: > int a,b,c; > > test2.c: > int a,c; > > Which is _stronger_? Those won't link together as they aren't declared static. If they would been static they could be ordered file-per-file (note: I'

Re: KERNEL BUG: console not working in linux

2000-11-27 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:Andries Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 05:40:58PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > > What about adding an additional > > > > > > andb$0xfe, %al > > > > > > in front of the outb? > >

Re: out of swap

2000-11-27 Thread Joe
What would I like it to do? Warn me maybe before my swap goes to zero. Kill the program that is doing this possibly. Allow me to set a per process memory / swap limit so that no one process can suck up my system resources. I'd rather not increase swap if possible, as it was only this one page

Re: KERNEL BUG: console not working in linux

2000-11-27 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 05:40:58PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > What about adding an additional > > > > andb$0xfe, %al > > > > in front of the outb? > Already in test12-pre1. Ach, I see I am too slow - had not even seen -pre1 and now Linus already announces -pre2. Anyway, I consi

RE: out of swap

2000-11-27 Thread David Schwartz
> Last night I was browsing the web and I came across a page with > LOTS of images. There were so many that it drove my swap space > to ZERO. I still had 3 Meg of memory, but the system became > virtually unusable and SLOW. (there were over 150 x 30k+ images > on one page). > > Is this somethin

test12-pre2

2000-11-27 Thread Linus Torvalds
Oh, well. Some people saw the (unannounced, and not for public consumption) pre1, so here's pre2. pre1 was just meant to be an interim patch to sync up with the ISDN patches. Due to the birth of my third daughter last week (yes, I got /.'ed), if you sent me patches that aren't in pre2, you can p

Re: syslinux and 2.4.0 initrd size problems

2000-11-27 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jeff V. Merkey] > I am having trouble getting a 2.4 vmlinuz (bzImage) and initrd image > onto a 1.44 floppy with all the new stuff. Check out what Debian did for 2.2 ("potato"). Kernel and syslinux are on a FAT floppy, and a second floppy holds a raw ext2 image, gzipped. SYSLINUX.CFG begins li

2.4.0-test12pre1 fails compile (vmscan.c)

2000-11-27 Thread Pete Clements
FYI: gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test12/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686-c -o vmscan.o vmscan.c vmscan.c: In function `try_to_swap_out': vmscan.c:199: duplicate label `out_failed' make[

Re: 2.2.18-23 w/Frame Buffer (LEVEL IV)

2000-11-27 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:"Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > > Let me guess: it's a 4 cpu smp system? > > Correct. I take it them this is supposed to happen. > Yup, one penguin per CPU. -hpa -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work,

out of swap

2000-11-27 Thread Joe
Last night I was browsing the web and I came across a page with LOTS of images. There were so many that it drove my swap space to ZERO. I still had 3 Meg of memory, but the system became virtually unusable and SLOW. (there were over 150 x 30k+ images on one page). Is this something that the OO

out of swap

2000-11-27 Thread Joe
Last night I was browsing the web and I came across a page with LOTS of images. There were so many that it drove my swap space to ZERO. I still had 3 Meg of memory, but the system became virtually unusable and SLOW. (there were over 150 x 30k+ images on one page). Is this something that the OO

Re: Linux driver for c-media cm8x38 ver 4.12 released

2000-11-27 Thread cmedia
Hi, I change it so a release 4.14 posted at http://members.home.net/puresoft/cmedia.html. This version has no functional change. Sincerely, ChenLi Tien Peter Samuelson wrote: > [ChenLi Tien] > > > I don't think the (2,3,0) ifdef is necessary. Just use the labeled > > > initializers for all ke

Re: IDE-driver not generalized enough ?

2000-11-27 Thread Andre Hedrick
Yes, I have been working on that for some time. This requires that the macros be exported the arch-xxx/ide.h Additionally it takes more work to modify the request_io and release_io, but it is all doable. On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Bjorn Wesen wrote: > Hi! Quick question: is it possible to write an ID

Re: KERNEL BUG: console not working in linux

2000-11-27 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:Andries Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > What about adding an additional > > andb$0xfe, %al > > in front of the outb? > If I understand things correctly, bit 0 of 0x92 is write-only > on some hardware, and w

Re: KERNEL BUG: console not working in linux

2000-11-27 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 08:27:38PM +0100, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > could original complainer (and peoples with AMD SC*) test following > patch? It just does nothing in case that A20 enabled bit is already > set - such as in case when there is nobody listening on 0x92 and > so inb returns 0xFF...

The Register (fwd)

2000-11-27 Thread Andre Hedrick
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/14907.html Everyone, do not reply to this. Because I know that Bill G. has a psuedo name here and I have not figured it out yet otherwise I would sent this direct. This is a personal poke at him, that they ingnored the subject until figuring out that Linu

Re: Universal debug macros.

2000-11-27 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Elmer Joandi] > Oh, and one more point: if linux is going to have nonprofessional > endusers space comparable to MSWin, then you probably do not want to > have every bug report, because these will be stupid anyway, with or > without debug info. But if ideological wars stop development in > nons

IDE-driver not generalized enough ?

2000-11-27 Thread Bjorn Wesen
Hi! Quick question: is it possible to write an IDE driver for a controller that is not mappable using outp and those memory-mapped thingys ? I see all the nice overrideables in struct hwif_s but the main code still uses OUT_BYTE which is hardcoded to an outb_p.. non-overrideable. Same thing with

Re: *_trylock return on success?

2000-11-27 Thread Roger Larsson
On Saturday 25 November 2000 22:05, Roger Larsson wrote: > On Saturday 25 November 2000 20:22, Philipp Rumpf wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 08:03:49PM +0100, Roger Larsson wrote: > > > > _trylock functions return 0 for success. > > > > > > Not spin_trylock > > > > Argh, I missed the (recent

Problems with D-link DFE550TX in 2.4.0-test10

2000-11-27 Thread rob
Hi Resending due to no reply Any ideas what's wrong? At boot, I get the following messages: eth0: OEM Sundance Technology ST201 at 0xc880, 00:50:ba:14:de:30, IRQ 10. eth0: No MII transceiver found!, ASIC status 62 it works a bit, but it freezes every so often. The card is plugged into a 1

Re: 2.4.0-test11-ac2 and ac4 SMP will not run KDE 2.0

2000-11-27 Thread Alan Cox
> For what its worth, on my single processor home machine, all kernels > 2.4.0-test11-ac1,ac2,ac3, ac4 both UP and SMP run both Gnome and > KDE 2.0, with reiserfs-3.6.19. In other words, everything works with > everything. Nod. It actually puzzles me since from the kernel view I doubt kde and g

Re: 2.2.18-23 w/Frame Buffer (LEVEL IV)

2000-11-27 Thread Alan Cox
> A level IV issue in 2.2.18-23. With frame buffer enabled, upon boot, > the OS is displaying four penguin images instead of one penguin in the four processors ? > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please re

Re: Dell 5000e APM (fixed!)

2000-11-27 Thread Alan Cox
> The BIOS listed is a new test BIOS that has a *corrected* APM that I > received this morning. I really want to take a second to thank the Good they've changed the BIOS id. Thansk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROT

Re: real_root_dev

2000-11-27 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:27:00PM +0100, Marcus Sundberg wrote: > This reminded me of an old bug which apparently still hasn't been > fixed (not in 2.2 at least). In init/main.c we have: > > extern int rd_image_start;/* starting block # of image */ > #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD > kdev_t re

Re: OOps in exec_usermodehelper

2000-11-27 Thread Andrew Morton
Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > Hi, > I have one small problem with 2.4.0-test11 and exec_usermodehelper. > When vmware modules shutdown (specifically vmnet-netifup), kernel tries > to load some module through call_usermodehelper, but unfortunately > from task which has current->files == NULL. > >

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11: _isofs_bmap: block < 0

2000-11-27 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:09:12PM +0100, Jörg Schütter wrote: > after upgrading from test9 to test11, skipping test 10, I get > the messages "_isofs_bmap: block < 0", "_isofs_bmap: block < ..." > which also means I can't read the cd. A FAQ. Remove the two lines - if (filp->f_pos >= inod

Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"

2000-11-27 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 02:34:45PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > The following shell-script shows that gcc-2.8.1 produces code with > data allocations adjacent. However, they are reversed! same with 2.95.* :). Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"

Re: access() says EROFS even for device files if /dev is mounted RO

2000-11-27 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:47:06PM +0100, Rogier Wolff wrote: > Andries Brouwer wrote: > > > access("/dev/tty2", R_OK|W_OK) = -1 EROFS (Read-only file system) > > > You misunderstand the function of access(). The standard says > > > > [EROFS] write access shall fail if write access is r

Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"

2000-11-27 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Tigran Aivazian] > _BUT_ never let this to be a default option, please. Because there > are valid cases where a programmer things "this is in .data" and that > means this should be in .data. If you are writing the sort of code that cares which section it ends up in, you need to use __attribute

Re: 2.2.18-23 w/Frame Buffer (LEVEL IV)

2000-11-27 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Sven Koch wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > A level IV issue in 2.2.18-23. With frame buffer enabled, upon boot, > > the OS is displaying four penguin images instead of one penguin in the > > upper left corner of the screen. Looks rather tacky. Also puts the VGA >

9750 vs. blade3D gives freaky ttyS3 problem)

2000-11-27 Thread Lee Brown
Dear smart people on the kernel mailing list: I have celeron 300 MHz box (overcl'ked to 450) I am running 2.4 test11. ISA PnP enabled. I am using the fbconsole(VESA VGA). I have a tried and true serial modem. When I put in a Trident 975AGP the /dev/ttyS3 (modem) works fine. I can tell this beca

Re: 2.4.0-test11-ac2 and ac4 SMP will not run KDE 2.0

2000-11-27 Thread Steven Cole
On Monday 27 November 2000 13:08, Alan Cox wrote: > > Precision 420 Dual P-III. All kernels are patched with > > linux-2.4.0-test10-reiserfs-3.6.19-patch. > > I don't test -ac kernel trees with reiserfs. I don't really have time. Can > you or others reproduce the same report on an unmodified tree

Re: VGA PCI IO port reservations

2000-11-27 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan Cox) wrote on 18.11.00 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > It is. There are plenty of devices for which an arbitrary IN is an > > irrecoverable state transition. > > The ne2000 clones being the most infamous of them. Blind ISA read probing is > not a safe business Hell, I've h

Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"

2000-11-27 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (H. Peter Anvin) wrote on 26.11.00 in <8vrstp$o7d$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The problem is that it doesn't. One could argue this is a gcc bug or > rather missed optimization. > > One can, of course, also write: > > static int a /* = 0 */; > > ... to make it clear to human pro

RE: bread in fat_access failed

2000-11-27 Thread Nerijus Baliunas
> Nov 28 01:00:28 sargis kernel: bread in fat_access failed > Nov 28 01:00:28 sargis kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device > Nov 28 01:00:28 sargis kernel: 02:00: rw=0, want=5, limit=4 > Nov 28 01:00:28 sargis kernel: dev 02:00 blksize=512 blocknr=9 > sector=9 size=512 > count=1 > > Wha

Re: KERNEL BUG: console not working in linux

2000-11-27 Thread Jorge Nerin
Gianluca Anzolin wrote: > > Hello > sorry if I'm mailing this twice, but there is a kernel bug in > linux 2.2 and linux 2.4. Linux 2.0 is not affected. I tested also > FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Windows 95 and DOS and they all work. > > The problem is that linux doesn't find the video car

[udo@udoheld.de: Hardware recognization error on Davicom 9102 with Tulip DS21140 driver]

2000-11-27 Thread Udo Held
Forwarded message from Udo Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:01:26 +0100 From: Udo Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Hardware recognization error on Davicom 9102 with Tulip DS21140 driver User-Agent: M

Re: KERNEL BUG: console not working in linux

2000-11-27 Thread Gianluca Anzolin
Il giorno Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 11:08:10AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin scrisse: |Yes, it can. Unfortunately, some "legacy-free" PCs apparently are |starting to take the tack that the KBC is legacy. Therefore, the use |of port 92h is mandatory on those systems. | |Port 92h dates back to at the very lea

Re: 2.2.18-23 w/Frame Buffer (LEVEL IV)

2000-11-27 Thread Sven Koch
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > A level IV issue in 2.2.18-23. With frame buffer enabled, upon boot, > the OS is displaying four penguin images instead of one penguin in the > upper left corner of the screen. Looks rather tacky. Also puts the VGA > text mode default into mode 274.

2.2.18-23 w/Frame Buffer (LEVEL IV)

2000-11-27 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
A level IV issue in 2.2.18-23. With frame buffer enabled, upon boot, the OS is displaying four penguin images instead of one penguin in the upper left corner of the screen. Looks rather tacky. Also puts the VGA text mode default into mode 274. Is this what's supposed to happen? Jeff - To un

bread in fat_access failed

2000-11-27 Thread Nerijus Baliunas
Hello, I get a lot of such messages: Nov 28 01:00:28 sargis kernel: bread in fat_access failed Nov 28 01:00:28 sargis kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device Nov 28 01:00:28 sargis kernel: 02:00: rw=0, want=5, limit=4 Nov 28 01:00:28 sargis kernel: dev 02:00 blksize=512 blocknr=9 sector=9

Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"

2000-11-27 Thread Russell King
Albert D. Cahalan writes: > It is too late to fix things now. It would have been good to > have the compiler put explicitly zeroed data in a segment that > isn't shared with non-zero or uninitialized data, so that the > uninitialized data could be set to 0xfff00fff to catch bugs. > It would take m

Re: Multi-Chanel ATA, was: Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status

2000-11-27 Thread Sasi Peter
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Uwe Bonnes wrote: > the 3Ware Controllers have up to 8 channels. However I think you can > only use one drive per chanel. Hi! I'm afraid they have only one with intel RISC on board for hardware raid, which amkes these card rather exensive for me wanting multilple channels,

Re: ATA-4, ATA-5 TCQ status

2000-11-27 Thread Sasi Peter
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27 2000, Sasi Peter wrote: > > > implementation listed in the specs Linux might as well not support it :) > > > It's simply not worth it. > > But seriously, how come? > > I thought they just somewhat like copied the SCSI implementation... > I w

Re: silly [< >] and other excess

2000-11-27 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 16:02:13 -0600, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [Albert D. Cahalan] >> > Somebody else posted a reasonable hack for the [<>] problem. His >> > proposal involved letting multiple values share the same markers, >> > something like this: >Me too. (: Keith posed

aironet4500_cs

2000-11-27 Thread Georg Nikodym
Am I foolish to expect the aironet4500_cs (and friends) to work with my shiny new Cisco Aironet 340 pcmcia card? If not, anybody got any helpful hints on how to get things off the ground? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: USB-Storage drivers

2000-11-27 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:16:23PM +0100, Kurt Garloff wrote: > Hi Matthew, David, Linus, > > any particular reason why the support for special dongles in the usb-storage > driver can not be selected during kernel configuration? (See attached patch). A patch is pending that I submitted that adds

Re: silly [< >] and other excess

2000-11-27 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Albert D. Cahalan] > > Somebody else posted a reasonable hack for the [<>] problem. His > > proposal involved letting multiple values share the same markers, > > something like this: [Russell King] > Yep, now that is one idea I like! Me too. (: Keith posed two objections: 1. The >] could

Re: USB-Storage drivers

2000-11-27 Thread Matthew Dharm
Some of these sub-drivers are immature, even for the CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL label. AFAIK, a patch is pending to make Freecom support appear -- it's definately ready for prime-time, having been extensively tested by several people. Matt On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:16:23PM +0100, Kurt Garloff wrote:

Hardware recognization error on Davicom 9102 with Tulip DS21140 driver

2000-11-27 Thread Udo Held
Hi! I didn't know which driver was the right one for my network card so I just compiled all network-card drivers that where listed into my kernel I tried it with test9 and test11. The DS21140 Tulip driver found my card and crashes the system during boot up. My card is a Davicom 9102(?). It's work

Re: access() says EROFS even for device files if /dev is mounted RO

2000-11-27 Thread Rogier Wolff
Andries Brouwer wrote: > > access("/dev/tty2", R_OK|W_OK) = -1 EROFS (Read-only file system) > You misunderstand the function of access(). The standard says > > [EROFS] write access shall fail if write access is requested > for a file on a read-only file system The intent of th

awe64-bug in 2.4.0-test11

2000-11-27 Thread Kristian
Hi! Here're some notes about my problem: · problems with awe64 soundcard · maybe it has something to do with changes in sound.c in vers. 2.4.0-test11? a general description of the problem: · i'm getting some kernel-oopses while loading awe_wave.o . · This soundcard (Creative Soundblaster AWE

Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"

2000-11-27 Thread Marcus Sundberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Meissner) writes: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 06:21:13PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 12:39:55AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > > Also I believe linkers are allowed to arbitrarily reorder members in > > > the data and bss sections. I coul

Dell 5000e APM (fixed!)

2000-11-27 Thread Brad Douglas
Alan, here's the DMI info you requested. Sorry about the delay. The BIOS listed is a new test BIOS that has a *corrected* APM that I received this morning. I really want to take a second to thank the people at Compal (BizCom) for the short turnaround once we figured out who the right people wer

USB-Storage drivers

2000-11-27 Thread Kurt Garloff
Hi Matthew, David, Linus, any particular reason why the support for special dongles in the usb-storage driver can not be selected during kernel configuration? (See attached patch). I can only tell about the Freecom support in the usb-storage driver: It works flawlessly for me driving some OnStre

Re: Universal debug macros.

2000-11-27 Thread Gerhard Mack
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > > > "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Something RedHat & co may want to consider doing is providing a basic > > > > > kernel and have, as part of the install procedure or later, an > > > > > automa

Re: Anyone else kernel mounting a filesystem that has a block device?

2000-11-27 Thread John Zielinski
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, John Zielinski wrote: > > > I'm going to be mounting a filesystem that uses a block device from inside > > the kernel. This mount will not be visible from userland nor can it be > > unmounted from userland. Is anyone else doing something like this so we can > > coordinate

Re: About IP address

2000-11-27 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:"Michael H. Warfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Glad you can't understand it, because it's incorrect. They can > be used but they are both assigned to IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers > Authority) as reserved addre

Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"

2000-11-27 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
Andries Brouwer writes: > Do I explain things so badly? Let me try again. > The difference between > > static int a; > > and > > static int a = 0; > > is the " = 0". The compiler may well generate the same code, > but I am not talking about the compiler. I am talking about > the programme

Re: About IP address

2000-11-27 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 05:30:03PM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, J. Dow wrote: > >Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 14:15:41 -0800 > >From: J. Dow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Content-Type: text/plain; > >charset="is

Re: Anyone else kernel mounting a filesystem that has a block device?

2000-11-27 Thread Alexander Viro
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, John Zielinski wrote: > I'm going to be mounting a filesystem that uses a block device from inside > the kernel. This mount will not be visible from userland nor can it be > unmounted from userland. Is anyone else doing something like this so we can > coordinate on the ch

Anyone else kernel mounting a filesystem that has a block device?

2000-11-27 Thread John Zielinski
I'm going to be mounting a filesystem that uses a block device from inside the kernel. This mount will not be visible from userland nor can it be unmounted from userland. Is anyone else doing something like this so we can coordinate on the changes needed to fs/super.c? John - To unsubscribe f

linux-2.4.0-test11: _isofs_bmap: block < 0

2000-11-27 Thread Jörg Schütter
Hello, after upgrading from test9 to test11, skipping test 10, I get the messages "_isofs_bmap: block < 0", "_isofs_bmap: block < ..." which also means I can't read the cd. I hope I don't missed a flag in the new kernel configuration. I will attach the configuration file which works fine with

Re: 2.4.0-test11-ac2 and ac4 SMP will not run KDE 2.0

2000-11-27 Thread Alan Cox
> When I try to start KDE 2.0 with SMP builds > of 2.4.0-test11-ac2 and ac4, the system locks up > after "Loading Panel". Nothing odd gets logged > to /var/log/messages. > Precision 420 Dual P-III. All kernels are patched with > linux-2.4.0-test10-reiserfs-3.6.19-patch. I don't test -ac kernel tr

2.4.0-test11-ac2 and ac4 SMP will not run KDE 2.0

2000-11-27 Thread Steven Cole
When I try to start KDE 2.0 with SMP builds of 2.4.0-test11-ac2 and ac4, the system locks up after "Loading Panel". Nothing odd gets logged to /var/log/messages. I can successfully run KDE 2.0 with UP builds of any of these kernels. I can successfully run Gnome or Fvwm1 with either UP or SMP bu

Re: KERNEL BUG: console not working in linux

2000-11-27 Thread H. Peter Anvin
"Albert D. Cahalan" wrote: > > > > Yes, it can. Unfortunately, some "legacy-free" PCs apparently > > are starting to take the tack that the KBC is legacy. Therefore, > > the use of port 92h is mandatory on those systems. > > Not just embedded systems? > Nope. I was rather surprised to find t

mm->rss modified without the page_table_lock held (revisited)

2000-11-27 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. (The following (with minor differences in the text) was sent to linux-kernel Thursday. I have received no response and the item is still on Teds list of todo (www version anyway) so I'll risk a limb to the Quake monster :) by sending this to you.) Some time ago there was a thread about subj

Re: Universal debug macros.

2000-11-27 Thread Andrew E. Mileski
"Richard B. Johnson" wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Andrew E. Mileski wrote: > > Agreed, but that wasn't my point. There is debug code in the current > > kernel that defines DEBUG to something non-numeric, which causes > > the compile to barf on kernel.h in some cases (try defining DEBUG in > >

Re: KERNEL BUG: console not working in linux

2000-11-27 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
H. Peter Anvin writes: > [Albert Cahalan] >> [Alan Cox] 1) Why did they disable my videocard ? >>> >>> Because your machine is not properly PC compatible >> >> The same can be said of systems that don't support the >> standard keyboard controller for A20 control. > > Yes, it can. Unfortunat

Re: PROBLEM: crashing kernels

2000-11-27 Thread Mr. Big
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Mr. Big wrote: > > > But maybe the /proc/interrupts could be usefull: > >CPU0 CPU1 > > 0: 413111 0 XT-PIC timer > > 1:687 0 XT-PIC keyboard > > 2:

Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"

2000-11-27 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 12:36:55PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > > wrong to depend on two variables winding up in at adjacent offsets. > > I'd like if it will be written explicitly in the specs that it's forbidden to > rely on that. I grepped the

Re: How to transfer memory from PCI memory directly to user space safely and portable?

2000-11-27 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Philipp Rumpf wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:36:34AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > By author:Philipp Rumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > > > > I hope count isn't provided by userspace here ? > > > > > > > 1. What h

Re: How to transfer memory from PCI memory directly to user space safely and portable?

2000-11-27 Thread Philipp Rumpf
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:36:34AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > By author:Philipp Rumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > > I hope count isn't provided by userspace here ? > > > > > 1. What happens if the user space memory is swa

Re: KERNEL BUG: console not working in linux

2000-11-27 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 11:08:10AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > It would have been somewhat different if there had been a standard > BIOS function for enabling A20, but there isn't one. > > Sometimes, in the PC world, you just have to draw a line and say "this > is too broken to use". I think

Re: KERNEL BUG: console not working in linux

2000-11-27 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:"Albert D. Cahalan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > >> 1) Why did they disable my videocard ? > > > > Because your machine is not properly PC compatible > > The same can be said of systems that don't support the > standard key

Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"

2000-11-27 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 12:36:55PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > wrong to depend on two variables winding up in at adjacent offsets. I'd like if it will be written explicitly in the specs that it's forbidden to rely on that. I grepped the specs and I didn't find anything. So I wasn't sure if I

Re: PROBLEM: crashing kernels

2000-11-27 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Mr. Big wrote: > But maybe the /proc/interrupts could be usefull: >CPU0 CPU1 > 0: 413111 0 XT-PIC timer > 1:687 0 XT-PIC keyboard > 2: 0 0 XT-PIC cascade > 7: 75

Re: KERNEL BUG: console not working in linux

2000-11-27 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
>> 1) Why did they disable my videocard ? > > Because your machine is not properly PC compatible The same can be said of systems that don't support the standard keyboard controller for A20 control. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message

  1   2   >