Serial cardbus code.... for testing, please.....

2000-12-08 Thread tytso
I haven't been able to get PCMCIA working under Linux 2.4 with any kind of serial devices (Cardbus or normal ISA), at least not reliably, on my Vaio 505TX. I've tried both yenta_socket and i82365. It works about one time in ten, but I've never figured out what causes it to work or not work.

Re: [PATCH] NTFS repair tools

2000-12-08 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 07:37:55AM +, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: Hearing how many people trash their partition I would agree to comment out the NTFS write option altogether. I will make a patch for both 2.4.0-testX and 2.2.18latest and send them off to Linus/Alan over the weekend if no

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre25

2000-12-08 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:02:57PM +0100, Martin Kacer wrote: Is there any chance to get rid of these VMM failures? You should apply this patch on top of 2.2.18pre25: ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.2/2.2.18pre25/VM-global-2.2.18pre25-7.bz2 It

[PATCH] Re: kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

2000-12-08 Thread Alexander Viro
Folks, see if the following patch helps. AFAICS it closes a pretty real race - we could call block_write_full_page() for a page that has sync IO in progress and blindly change -b_end_io callbacks on the bh with pending requests. With a little bit of bad luck they would complete before we got to

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre25

2000-12-08 Thread Philipp Rumpf
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 10:47:46AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: |Bus 0, device 2, function 1: | Unknown class: Intel OEM MegaRAID Controller (rev 5). |Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capable. BIST capable. IRQ 10. Master Capable. Latency=64. |Prefetchable 32 bit memory at

Re: io_request_lock question (2.2)

2000-12-08 Thread Matthew Jacob
spin_lock_irq(io_request_lock); we finish the request and return to the add_request function which calls spin_unlock_irqrestore(io_request_lock,flags); and restores the flags. Isn't it possible now that the flags which we restore are out of date now? Is this idiom

Re: [PATCH,preliminary] cleanup shm handling

2000-12-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On 8 Dec 2000, Christoph Rohland wrote: here is my first shot for cleaning up the shm handling. It did survive some basic testing but is not ready for inclusion. The only comment I have right now is that you probably should not mark the page dirty in "nopage" - theoretically somebody

Re: [PATCH] for YMF PCI sound cards

2000-12-08 Thread Pete Zaitcev
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:41:07 -0500 (EST) From: Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Pete Zaitcev [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jaroslav Kysela [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ./drivers/sound/Config.in Thu Dec 7 10:59:06 2000 +++ ./drivers/sound/Config.in Fri

Re: Networking: RFC1122 and 1123 status for kernel 2.4

2000-12-08 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 07:28:15AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:31:54 +0100 From: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: No, unfortunately nobody has the time to do this. The RFC evaluation

Re: [PATCH] for YMF PCI sound cards

2000-12-08 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Pete Zaitcev wrote: +++ ./drivers/sound/ac97_codec.cThu Dec 7 11:00:44 2000 @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ } ac97_codec_ids[] = { {0x414B4D00, "Asahi Kasei AK4540 rev 0", NULL}, {0x414B4D01, "Asahi Kasei AK4540 rev 1", NULL}, + {0x41445303, "Yamaha YMF"

Re: [PATCH] Re: kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

2000-12-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Alexander Viro wrote: Fix: postpone changing -b_end_io until the call of ll_rw_block(); if by the time of ll_rw_block() some fragments will still have IO in progress - wait on them. Comments? Yes. On the other hand, I have this suspicion that there is an even

Re: Networking: RFC1122 and 1123 status for kernel 2.4

2000-12-08 Thread kuznet
Hello! They irritated you so much that you only noticed after six months ? I really edit and even read skbuff.h not every day and even not every month. Is this bad? 8) "Irritated" is wrong word. "To get a scare" is closer to truth. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Kernel oops 2.2.17

2000-12-08 Thread Jean-Francois Nadeau
Hi, We run a heavily accessed Apache 1.3.6 Web server on a Redhat 6.0 distro over 2.2.17. We upgraded from 2.2.16 and I now got some kernel oops. System is : AMD Athlon 600 Mhz. 512 MB RAM. gcc version egcs-2.91.66 glibc 2.1.3-21 Kernel tweaks : echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies

Re: Networking: RFC1122 and 1123 status for kernel 2.4

2000-12-08 Thread Christoph Hellwig
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: BTW what is this? It is just a question, I missed even the moment, when these things appeared: It allows us to generate man9 sets for that part of the kernel and other documentation sets That could even be automated when this little patch (against

Re: Signal 11

2000-12-08 Thread Dr. Kelsey Hudson
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Peter Samuelson wrote: [Dick Johnson] Do: char main[]={0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff}; Oh come on, at least pick an *interesting* invalid opcode: char main[]={0xf0,0x0f,0xc0,0xc8}; /* try also on NT (: */ What's funny, is that this actually executes on SPARC

Re: [PATCH] Re: kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

2000-12-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Alexander Viro wrote: Erm... So you want to make -commit_write() page-unlocking? Fine with me, but that will make for somewhat bigger patch. Hey, _you_ are in position to change the locking rules, freeze or not, so if it's OK with you... No. Read the code a bit more.

Re: Pthreads, linux, gdb, oh my! (fwd)

2000-12-08 Thread Peter Berger
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: I have seen two failure modes: on my machine (linux 2.2.5-22, glibc 2.1.1), when run under gdb 5.0, the created pthreads stick around as glibc 2.1.1 definitely has problems with several bits of pthreads. You want 2.1.3 or higher I believe. So you're

Re: Signal 11

2000-12-08 Thread Dr. Kelsey Hudson
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: I think there may be a case when a process forks, that the MMU or some other subsystem is either not setting the page bits correctly, or mapping in a bad page. It's a LEVEL I bug in 2.4 is this is the

Re: eepro100 driver update for 2.4

2000-12-08 Thread Ion Badulescu
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Andrey Savochkin wrote: The sympthomes are that the card triggers Flow Control Pause condition (and interrupt) on the last stages of the initialization or right after. And it happens with flow control being explicitly turned off. High network load considerably

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre25

2000-12-08 Thread willy tarreau
Bad day, Alan? ;) Umm no but having people _keep_ sending you do nothing patches gets annoying after a while ;) Please accept all my apologies, Alan. When I quickly sent you the last patch, I didn't notice that some other broken code had been removed, what I discovered later back home and

Re: [PATCH,preliminary] cleanup shm handling

2000-12-08 Thread Christoph Rohland
David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can you help me with an SHM related problem? I'm currently writing a Win32 emulation kernel module to help speed Wine up, and I'm writing the file mapping support stuff at the moment (CreateFileMapping and MapViewOfFile). These two calls were

[PATCH] remove warning from drivers/net/arlan.c

2000-12-08 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. The following patch eliminates an 'defined but not used' warning when compiling drivers/net/arlan.c without module support (240t12p3). It also fixes a typo. It should apply cleanly. --- linux-240-t12-pre3-clean/drivers/net/arlan.cWed Nov 22 22:41:40 2000 +++

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre25

2000-12-08 Thread willy tarreau
"I'm sure" meaning "I didn't test it" ? absolutely, I believed that the driver was *exactly* the same as the previous release which didn't boot and needed the fix, but another fix has been applied and corrected it. Now I think it will work with a clean 2.2.18pre25. Anyway, I left a kernel

[PATCH] remove warnings from drivers/net/eepro.c (240-test12-pre7)

2000-12-08 Thread Rasmus Andersen
(I sent the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but forgot to cc linux-kernel). Hi. The following patch removes some 'defined but not used' warnings when compiling drivers/net/eepro.c (240t12p7) without modular support. --- linux-240-t12-pre7-clean/drivers/net/eepro.cFri Dec 8 00:44:58

Re: That horrible hack from hell called A20

2000-12-08 Thread Riley Williams
Hi Peter. On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Linus Torvalds wrote: Actually, I bet I know what's up. Want to bet $5 USD that suspend/resume saves the keyboard A20 state, but does NOT save the fast-A20 gate information? So anything that enables A20 with only the fast A20 gate will

[PATCH] remove warning from drivers/net/hp100.c (240-test12-pre7)

2000-12-08 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. The following patch removes a 'defined but not used' warning from drivers/ new/hp100.c when compiling without CONFIG_PCI (240t12p3). It should apply cleanly. --- linux-240-t12-pre3-clean/drivers/net/hp100.cSat Nov 4 23:27:07 2000 +++ linux/drivers/net/hp100.c Sat Dec 2 16:07:27

Re: eepro100 driver update for 2.4

2000-12-08 Thread Udo A. Steinberg
Ion Badulescu wrote: The fact that apparently only the people using 82559 chips are seeing this seems to confirm my analysis above. If you could try the attached patch (and maybe pass it onto the other people who are experiencing this problem), that would be great. + /*

[PATCH] mm-rss is modified without page_table_lock held

2000-12-08 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. The following patch moves the page_table_lock in mm/* to cover the modification of mm-rss in 240-test12-pre7. It was inspired by a similar patch from davej(?) which covered too much, AFAIR. The item is on Tytso's ToDo list. Please comment. diff -Naur linux-240-t12-pre7-clean/mm/memory.c

kernel bug with 2.4.0-test12pre7 at startup

2000-12-08 Thread Norbert Breun
Hallo, at startup of 2.4.0-test12pre7 I receive a bug-message as part of the following boot.msg. I hope this will be helpfull. If you need more info, let me know. kind regards Norbert snip -- kernel BUG at buffer.c:827!

Re: Why is double_fault serviced by a trap gate?

2000-12-08 Thread Mikulas Patocka
No no. That's that the whole point of a gate. You make a controlled transition to ring 0 including stack switching. There are complex protection checking rules, however as long as the DPL of the gate descriptor is 3 then ring 3 is allowed to make the transition to ring 0. A stack fault in

[PATCH] remove warnings from drivers/char/moxa.c

2000-12-08 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. The following patch makes some 'defined but not used' warnings go away when compiling drivers/char/moxa.c without CONFIG_PCI (240t12p3). It should apply cleanly. --- linux-240-t12-pre3-clean/drivers/char/moxa.cWed May 3 10:45:18 2000 +++ linux/drivers/char/moxa.c Wed Nov 29

Re: [PATCH] mm-rss is modified without page_table_lock held

2000-12-08 Thread Mark Hahn
The following patch moves the page_table_lock in mm/* to cover the modification of mm-rss in 240-test12-pre7. It was inspired by a can't we just change rss to count pages? or are we worried about rss's over ~16 TB? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

[PATCH] remove warning from drivers/char/mxser.c

2000-12-08 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. The following patch makes some 'defined but not used' warnings go away when compiling drivers/char/mxser.c without CONFIG_PCI (240t12p3). It should apply cleanly. --- linux-240-t12-pre3-clean/drivers/char/mxser.c Wed Nov 22 22:41:39 2000 +++ linux/drivers/char/mxser.c Wed Nov 29

[PATCH] remove warning from drivers/char/random.c

2000-12-08 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. The following patch makes a 'defined but not used' warning go away when compiling drivers/char/random.c without sysctl support (240t12p3). (but should apply cleanly). I am aware that there is a sysctl section of this code, but the function seems to belong where it is. I would be happy to

[PATCH] for ymf_sb (YMF PCI legacy driver)

2000-12-08 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! I just found two serious bugs in the YMF PCI legacy driver (i.e. the driver that puts it to the Sound Blaster compatible mode). pci_unregister_driver() was not called from the cleanup routine, which caused a recoverable oops while running /sbin/lspci. Also some module parameters were

Re: Why is double_fault serviced by a trap gate?

2000-12-08 Thread richardj_moore
Exactly, and you wouldn't set DPL=3 for interrupt 8 since a double-fault can only occur from ring 0.. Richard Moore - RAS Project Lead - Linux Technology Centre (PISC). http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux Office: (+44) (0)1962-817072, Mobile: (+44) (0)7768-298183 IBM

[PATCH] remove warning from drivers/net/rclanmtl.c

2000-12-08 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. (Does anyone know the maintainer of this code?) When compiling drivers/net/rclanmtl.c (240t12p3) I get a warning about incompatible pointer assignment. As far as I can tell it has appeared because PU32 has been changed to __u32* since test9 (where it was an unsigned long*). The following

[PATCH] remove warning from drivers/net/tokenring/smctr.c

2000-12-08 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. This patch makes a 'defined but not used' warning go away when compiling drivers/net/tokenring/smctr.c without module support (kernel 240t12p3). (It should apply cleanly.) --- linux-240-t12-pre3-clean/drivers/net/tokenring/smctr.c Sat Nov 4 23:27:09 2000 +++

Re: eepro100 driver update for 2.4

2000-12-08 Thread Ion Badulescu
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Udo A. Steinberg wrote: + /* disable advertising the flow-control capability */ + sp-advertising = ~0x0400; + mdio_write(ioaddr, sp-phy[0] 0x1f, sp-advertising); ^^^

Re: [PATCH] Re: kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

2000-12-08 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Fri, 08 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: Btw, I also think that the dirty buffer flushing should get the page lock. Right now it touches the buffer list without holding the lock on the page that the buffer is on, which means that there is really nothign that prevents it from racing with the

[PATCH] remove warning from drivers/net/irda/w83977af_ir.c

2000-12-08 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. The following patch makes a 'defined but not used' warning go away when compiling drivers/net/irda/w83977af_ir.c without modular support (kernel 240t12p7). It also removes some unneeded zero initializations. --- linux-240-t12-pre7-clean/drivers/net/irda/w83977af_ir.c Wed Nov 22

Re: question about tulip patch to set CSR0 for pci 2.0 bus

2000-12-08 Thread Donald Becker
Jeff Garzik wrote: Clayton Weaver wrote: Shouldn't the setting of the CSR0 value for x86 switch between normal (0x01A08000) and cautious (0x01A04800) based on some notion of what generation of pci bus is installed rather than what cpu the kernel is compiled for? No, you

ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit

2000-12-08 Thread Chris Lattner
This email is here to announce the availability of a port of ORBit (the GNOME ORB) to the Linux kernel. This ORB, named kORBit, is available from our sourceforge web site (http://korbit.sourceforge.net/). A kernel ORB allows you to write kernel extensions in CORBA and have the kernel call into

Re: Disableing USB.

2000-12-08 Thread Bryan Whitehead
Er... Well, the traditional solution has been "don't build it into your kernel if you don't want it", but in the case of stock kernels, that isn't always an option, I suppose. Theoretically, the two devices shouldn't step on each other, but this is a computer. Theory is so far removed from

Re: [PATCH] Re: kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

2000-12-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Daniel Phillips wrote: [ flush-buffers taking the page lock ] This is great when you have buffersize==pagesize. When there are multiple buffers per page it means that some of the buffers might have to wait for flushing just because bdflush started IO on some other

Re: [PATCH] mm-rss is modified without page_table_lock held

2000-12-08 Thread David S. Miller
Date:Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:36:35 -0500 (EST) From: Mark Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] can't we just change rss to count pages? This is what it does now. or are we worried about rss's over ~16 TB? If we weren't, we could just use an atomic_t for this problem. We can't. This patch

Re: Serial cardbus code.... for testing, please.....

2000-12-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
I didn't have time to do more than just quickly apply the patch and leave in a hurry, but my Vaio certainly recognized the serial port on the combo cardbus card I have with this patch. Everything looked fine - I got a message saying it found a 16450 on ttyS4 when I plugged the card in. Ted, I

Re: Big IDE HD unclipping and IBM drive

2000-12-08 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Matan Ziv-Av wrote: Hi, I have an IBM drive, DTLA-307075 (75GB), and a bios that hangs with large disks. I use a jumper to clip it to 32GB size, so the bios can boot into linux. The problem is that WIN_READ_NATIVE_MAX returns 32GB, and not the true size, and even

Re: Serial cardbus code.... for testing, please.....

2000-12-08 Thread David Hinds
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 01:27:51PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: (Of course, I use tulip instead of epic100, so maybe there's an epic driver bug, but it's definitely hotplug-aware). There could be a problem in the epic driver; I've never had a card that uses this driver and have only limited

Re: 2.2.18pre21 oops reading /proc/apm

2000-12-08 Thread Neale Banks
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: Is there anything else I can contribute? The latitude and longtitude of the bios writers current position, and a ballistic missile. ;-) Please boot 2.2.18pre24 (not pre25) [...] Please pardon the naive question: is pre-patch-2.2.18-24 to be applied

[patch] conntrack and skb

2000-12-08 Thread Xuan Baldauf
Resent patch, hope that it will be acknowledged or discussed. Xuân. :o) Hello, I discovered a bug in netfilter and worked the last 4 days to track it down (I'm not a kernel hacker...): Symptoms: "Sometimes" the ip_conntrack module won't unload. rmmod or modprobe -r would stay unkillably

Re: Pthreads, linux, gdb, oh my! (fwd)

2000-12-08 Thread Peter Berger
Petr, Thanks for testing this and finding a working counterexample! I am still professionally interested to know if the difference is that you are running a 2.4 kernel, or the glibc. Anyone running a 2.2 kernel with glibc 2.2 want to drop me a line? -Peter (gdb) run ... [New Thread 25452]

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11 and sysklogd-1.3-31

2000-12-08 Thread Keith Owens
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:30:06 -0500 (EST), "Georg Nikodym" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But since you seem to and while we're doing extreme surgery, why have klogd at all? Every other unix, kernel messages are handled by the syslog system. What problem did klogd solve and does that problem still

Re: Lock ordering, inquiring minds want to know.

2000-12-08 Thread george anzinger
Mike Kravetz wrote: George, I can't answer your question. However, have you noticed that this lock ordering has changed in the test11 kernel. The new sequence is: read_lock_irq(tasklist_lock); spin_lock(runqueue_lock); Perhaps the person who made this change could

Re: Signal 11

2000-12-08 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: I have not seen it on UP systems either. I only see it on SMP systems. After trying very hard last night, I was able to get my 4 x PPro system to do it with 2.4.0-12. It seems related to loading in some way. If you have more than two processors,

Re: [PATCH] Re: kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

2000-12-08 Thread Alexander Viro
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Alexander Viro wrote: Erm... So you want to make -commit_write() page-unlocking? Fine with me, but that will make for somewhat bigger patch. Hey, _you_ are in position to change the locking rules, freeze or not, so if

Re: Pthreads, linux, gdb, oh my! (fwd)

2000-12-08 Thread David Relson
Petr, It ran fine on my stock Mandrake 7.2 system - linux-2.2.17-21mdk and glibc-2.2-5mdk. The program ran fine in both environments - command line and gdb-5.0. Loadavg creeps up slowly as the program continues to run. At thread #37000, loadavb is 3.65. The ps command indicates 4 threads

Re: Why is double_fault serviced by a trap gate?

2000-12-08 Thread Keith Owens
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000 07:58:06 -0500 (EST), "Richard B. Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Too many people just want to argue without even reading what they are arguing against. Again, I implied nothing. I said; (1) User traps, CPL3, stack for trap is in CPL0. (2) CPL0 has stack-fault (bad ring

GlobeCom 2000 - Networking papers

2000-12-08 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
Hi, I was a GlobeCom 2 weeks ago, and I noticed a few articles relevant to Linux networking that you might be interested in reading... On ECN : -- Archan Misra, John Baras Teunis Ott. Generalised TCP Congestion Avoidance and its Effect on Bandwidth Sharing and

Re: eepro100 driver update for 2.4

2000-12-08 Thread Udo A. Steinberg
Ion Badulescu wrote: Ok. Can you send me the entire dump? Also, it would be helpful if you could try to determine when exactly it happens (upon insmod, upon ifconfig up, or upon receiving some packets later). I have the eepro driver compiled into a monolithic kernel. After rebooting a

Re: [PATCH,preliminary] cleanup shm handling

2000-12-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On 8 Dec 2000, Christoph Rohland wrote: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 8 Dec 2000, Christoph Rohland wrote: here is my first shot for cleaning up the shm handling. It did survive some basic testing but is not ready for inclusion. The only comment I have right

Re: [PATCH] Re: kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

2000-12-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Alexander Viro wrote: I'm quite aware of that fact ;-) However, you said On the other hand, I have this suspicion that there is an even simpler solution: stop using the end_buffer_io_sync version for writes altogether. If that happens (i.e. if write

Re: Big IDE HD unclipping and IBM drive

2000-12-08 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 11:24:56PM +0200, Matan Ziv-Av wrote: I have an IBM drive, DTLA-307075 (75GB), and a bios that hangs with large disks. I use a jumper to clip it to 32GB size, so the bios can boot into linux. The problem is that WIN_READ_NATIVE_MAX returns 32GB, and not the true size,

Re: eepro100 driver update for 2.4

2000-12-08 Thread Josh Fryman
* put cable in * eth0: card reports no RX buffers. eth0: card reports no resources. eth0: card reports no RX buffers. eth0: card reports no resources. you know, this might be entirely unrelated, but i had the exact same type of problem with a brand new machine running a not-so-brand new

Re: Kernel oops 2.2.17

2000-12-08 Thread Keith Owens
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:14:31 -0500, "Jean-Francois Nadeau" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dec 7 17:01:54 trinity kernel: EIP: 0010:[update_vm_cache_conditional+138/328] You are letting klogd convert the oops, it is broken. Change klogd to run with "klogd -x", reproduce the oops and get a clean

Re: Signal 11

2000-12-08 Thread Horst von Brand
David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [...] I quote from the X devel list, which perhaps I shouldn't do but this is hardly NDA'd stuff: On Mon 20 Nov 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I have seen random crashes on dual P3 BX boards (Tyan) and dual Xeon GX boards (Intel). XFree86 core

Re: Networking: RFC1122 and 1123 status for kernel 2.4

2000-12-08 Thread Christoph Hellwig
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: That could even be automated when this little patch (against -test11, but -test12pre works too) is applied... Ok, I should actually attach the test11-final patch ;) Christoph -- Whip me. Beat me. Make me maintain AIX. diff -uNr

Re: USB-related lockup in test12-pre5

2000-12-08 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: Could you try the alternate UHCI driver? You may need to disable the UHCI driver you have configured for the option to become visible. Differently broken: uhci: host controller process error. something bad happened uhci: host

Re: [PATCH] for YMF PCI sound cards

2000-12-08 Thread Alan Cox
Loading the module would cause a very loud monotone squeal, like some kind of theft detection device. The computer Thats actually a generic bug in both ALSA and the kernel AC97 driver (fixed in 2.2 and by Linus in 2.4test). It is feedback between the microphone and speakers - To

Re: io_request_lock question (2.2)

2000-12-08 Thread Alan Cox
Yes, and I believe that this is what's broken about the SCSI midlayer. The the io_request_lock cannot be completely released in a SCSI HBA because the flags You can drop it with spin_unlock_irq and that is fine. I do that with no problems in the I2O scsi driver for example - To unsubscribe

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre25

2000-12-08 Thread Alan Cox
Well, I've found that VM-global patch before, of course. Until now, the last version was against pre18. Since I do not know the exact rules for including new things into Alan's tree, I thought that VM-global patch was already included in pre24. Sorry for my lack of experience. ;-)) I

Re: [PATCH] for YMF PCI sound cards

2000-12-08 Thread Alan Cox
{0x414B4D01, "Asahi Kasei AK4540 rev 1", NULL}, + {0x41445303, "Yamaha YMF" , NULL}, Are you sure it's correct? I am almost certain that no YMFxxx Its definitely wrong has on-chip AC97. I'd like to see a document that allows you the change quoted above. 4144 is

Re: Networking: RFC1122 and 1123 status for kernel 2.4

2000-12-08 Thread Alan Cox
That could even be automated when this little patch (against -test11, but -test12pre works too) is applied... +# MANPATH specifies where to install the manpages created from +# inline documentation +# + +MANDIR := /usr/share/man + End user installed so /usr/local/man or

Re: Pthreads, linux, gdb, oh my! (fwd)

2000-12-08 Thread Alan Cox
So you're saying that you got this to work? Because I certainly couldn't get it working with a higher version either. I would really love a I read straight down it anf realised you referenced obsolete versions of tg-created and thus broadcast incorrectly I apologize for my ignorance -- I

Re: Signal 11

2000-12-08 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
I'll try. Jeff On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 10:24:55PM +, David Woodhouse wrote: On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: I have not seen it on UP systems either. I only see it on SMP systems. After trying very hard last night, I was able to get my 4 x PPro system to do it with

Re: io_request_lock question (2.2)

2000-12-08 Thread Matthew Jacob
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: Yes, and I believe that this is what's broken about the SCSI midlayer. The the io_request_lock cannot be completely released in a SCSI HBA because the flags You can drop it with spin_unlock_irq and that is fine. I do that with no problems in the I2O

Any cure for kupdate freezing ongoing I/Os ?

2000-12-08 Thread T R Vishwanath
I am running the 2.2.14 linux kernel, and doing buffered writes to disk. Whenever kupdate runs, I notice that the I/Os freeze up, sometimes taking 10-20 seconds to complete. Are there any patches to the kernel to prevent thsi kind of behaviour ? I am using the standard bdflush parameters. Is this

Re: question about tulip patch to set CSR0 for pci 2.0 bus

2000-12-08 Thread Alan Cox
Just in case you didn't catch it: this is not a PCI v2.0 vs. v2.1 issue. The older Tulips work great with PCI v2.0 and v2.1. The bug is with longer bursts and a specific i486 chipset/motherboard. Which chipset. I can then add it to the PCI quirks and we can do it nicely in 2.4 so that

Re: io_request_lock question (2.2)

2000-12-08 Thread Reto Baettig
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: Yes, and I believe that this is what's broken about the SCSI midlayer. The the io_request_lock cannot be completely released in a SCSI HBA because the flags You can drop it with spin_unlock_irq and that is fine. I do that with no problems

Hard crash when trying to use PCI parallel port card

2000-12-08 Thread David Härdeman
With the purpose of having two printers connected to my Linux server I bought a PCI (single port) parallel port card thinking that installation would be straightforward. Parport was already compiled into the kernel (version 2.2.17), and lp is a module. After looking at the output from 'lspci

Re: io_request_lock question (2.2)

2000-12-08 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 04:03:58PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: Yes, and I believe that this is what's broken about the SCSI midlayer. The the io_request_lock cannot be completely released in a SCSI HBA because the flags You can drop it with

Re: 2.2.18pre21 oops reading /proc/apm

2000-12-08 Thread Alan Cox
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: Is there anything else I can contribute? The latitude and longtitude of the bios writers current position, and a ballistic missile. ;-) Please boot 2.2.18pre24 (not pre25) [...] Please pardon the naive question: is pre-patch-2.2.18-24 to

Re: io_request_lock question (2.2)

2000-12-08 Thread Matthew Jacob
I am actually concerned about the following case: The add_request ON CPU_1 function calls spin_lock_irqsave(io_request_lock,flags); Our I/O Function unlocks the spinlock and goes to sleep. Finally, the add_request function, NOW ON CPU_2 calls

Re: io_request_lock question (2.2)

2000-12-08 Thread Matthew Jacob
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: Yes, and I believe that this is what's broken about the SCSI midlayer. The the io_request_lock cannot be completely released in a SCSI HBA because the flags You can drop it with spin_unlock_irq and that is fine. I do that with no

Re: io_request_lock question (2.2)

2000-12-08 Thread Alan Cox
You can drop it with spin_unlock_irq and that is fine. I do that with no problems in the I2O scsi driver for example I am (like, I think I *finally* got locking sorta right in my QLogic driver), but doesn't this still leave ints blocked for this CPU at least? spin_unlock_irq

2.2.16 and 2.2.17 nfsroot boot problem with D-Link DE-220PCT

2000-12-08 Thread Eddy
This is a second posting, I just got back onto the kernel mailing list. The first was sent via dejanews. So If this looks familiar... It is. Ignore It. Hi all, I seem to be having some problems configuring kernels 2.2.16 and 2.2.17 to nfsroot boot. I have two machines at a friends house I

Re: question about tulip patch to set CSR0 for pci 2.0 bus

2000-12-08 Thread Donald Becker
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: Just in case you didn't catch it: this is not a PCI v2.0 vs. v2.1 issue. The older Tulips work great with PCI v2.0 and v2.1. The bug is with longer bursts and a specific i486 chipset/motherboard. Which chipset. I can then add it to the PCI quirks and

Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit

2000-12-08 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: This email is here to announce the availability of a port of ORBit (the GNOME ORB) to the Linux kernel. OMG you guys are so cool :) Hey, this is real craftsmanship (not sure if it useful :) Does this revamp the Micro Kernel Discussin? ONLY KIDDING :)

2.4.0-test11 + reiserfs + iptables

2000-12-08 Thread David D.W. Downey
Hi guys, Not sure if this is the right list for this, but I'll spew this forward too you. Redirects to right place is definitiely welcome. Since I added the reiserfs kernel patch , I figured I'd mention it. Problem: When building the kernel things buld fine with no errors other than the

Re : [RFC-2] Configuring Synchronous Interfaces in Linux

2000-12-08 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
Alan wrote : struct wireless_physical struct wireless_80211 struct wireless_auth Please do not underestimate 802.11 (and others). Even two cards based on the same MAC controller can have very different way to

Re: USB-related lockup in test12-pre5

2000-12-08 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: Could you try the alternate UHCI driver? You may need to disable the UHCI driver you have configured for the option to become visible. Differently broken: uhci: host

Re: USB-related lockup in test12-pre5

2000-12-08 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000, Johannes Erdfelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Dec 08, 2000, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: Could you try the alternate UHCI driver? You may need to disable the UHCI driver you have configured for the

[PATCH] 2.4.0 proc_fs for 2.2.18

2000-12-08 Thread Michael Rothwell
Alan Cox wrote: Why is 2.2.18 proc_fs.c different than both 2.2.17 and 2.4.0? Cox, would you accept a patch that makes 2.2.18 define create_proc_info_entry and related functions the same way that 2.4.0 does? Send me a diff and I'll be happy to Here it is, both inlined and as an

Re: 2.4.0-test11 + reiserfs + iptables

2000-12-08 Thread Keith Owens
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:53:16 -0800, "David D.W. Downey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When building the kernel things buld fine with no errors other than the standard warnings generated by -Wall. Running the make dep bzImage modules modules_install command completes. Nothing big there, but when i

GCC builds crashing on RH 7

2000-12-08 Thread Horst von Brand
I reported this earlier. Now with 2.2.18pre25 and today's CVS is is past the place where it crashed. Sorry for the red herring. -- Horst von Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Casilla 9G, Vin~a del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616 - To unsubscribe from

2.2.18-25 and PS/2 Mouse

2000-12-08 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Alan, The mouse problems have gone away with the 2.2.18-25 pre-patch. I am not seeing the problems anymore on the affected systems. I am trying this evening to apply the 2.4 patch sent to me to see if it helps with the page cache corruption problem with fork(). Jeff - To unsubscribe from

Re: question about tulip patch to set CSR0 for pci 2.0 bus

2000-12-08 Thread Horst von Brand
Donald Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [...] The best way to check for this buggy chipset was to check for a 486 processor. There are very few 486 chips on non-buggy motherboards, and the performance impact of shorter PCI bursts is minimal given the slow speed of the 486. Enable it #if

Re: kernel bug with 2.4.0-test12pre7 at startup

2000-12-08 Thread Norbert Breun
Marc, if more / other information is needed let me know. I'll try to go through the points as described in /usr/src/linux/REPORTING-BUGS: [1.] Bug reported on system startup. [2.] no obvious problem detected besides this message besides apic errors on both CPUs. [3.] kernel BUG at

Re: [PATCH] 2.4.0 proc_fs for 2.2.18: UPDATED

2000-12-08 Thread Michael Rothwell
Michael Rothwell wrote: Alan Cox wrote: Why is 2.2.18 proc_fs.c different than both 2.2.17 and 2.4.0? Cox, would you accept a patch that makes 2.2.18 define create_proc_info_entry and related functions the same way that 2.4.0 does? Send me a diff and I'll be happy to Here it

Re: [PATCH] Re: kernel BUG at buffer.c:827 in test12-pre6 and 7

2000-12-08 Thread Alexander Viro
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: Looking more at this issue, I suspect that the easiest pretty solution that everybody can probably agree is reasonable is to either pass down the end-of-io callback to ll_rw_block as you suggested, or, preferably by just forcing the _caller_ to do

<    1   2   3   4   5   >