Re: 2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems

2001-02-01 Thread Michal Jaegermann
To follow my own message about lockups on UP1100. This time I tried to boot 2.4.1-ac1. Results are really the same but this time an attempt to copy kernel source from a partition on a SCSI drive to another one on an IDE drive brought different message. I include it below. When trying to

Re: [Patch] DVD bugfix in ide-cd.c

2001-02-01 Thread udgaard
This patch made it work for me watching DVDs that used to stop, ie. oms crashed. So I'll approve the patch :-) Peter Fredrik Vraalsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01 Feb 2001 23:12:44 wrote: > > >This is a small patch to Linux kernel 2.4.1 that fixes a problem with >DVD playback in OMS (Open Media

Re: Serial device with very large buffer

2001-02-01 Thread Alex Belits
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Joe deBlaquiere wrote: > >>I'm a little confused here... why are we overrunning? This thing is > >> running externally at 19200 at best, even if it does all come in as a > >> packet. > > > > > > Different Merlin -- original Merlin is 19200, "Merlin for Ricochet" is

Re: problem with devfsd compilation

2001-02-01 Thread Michael B. Trausch
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > I am trying to compile devfsd on my system running RedHat linux 7.0 > > (kernel 2.2.16-22). I get the error "RTLD_NEXT" undefined. I am not > > sure where this symbol is defined. Is there anything that I am missing > > on my system. > > Sounds like a

Re: SO_REUSEADDR redux

2001-02-01 Thread David S. Miller
Paul D. Smith writes: > %% Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> This application uses SO_REUSEADDR in conjunction with INADDR_ANY. What > >> it does is bind() to INADDR_ANY, then listen(). Then, it proceeds to > >> bind (but _not_ listen) various other specific addresses. >

Re: Serial device with very large buffer

2001-02-01 Thread Joe deBlaquiere
Alex Belits wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Joe deBlaquiere wrote: > > >> Hi Alex! >> >> I'm a little confused here... why are we overrunning? This thing is >> running externally at 19200 at best, even if it does all come in as a >> packet. > > > Different Merlin -- original Merlin

[UPDATE] Zerocopy patch of the day...

2001-02-01 Thread David S. Miller
In the usual spot: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1-2.diff.gz Changes: 1) Merge in 3c59x update from Andrew Morton. I hope Andrew won't mind if people who see problems due to these changes at least CC: him on bug reports? :-) 2) Correct receive buffer

Re: Serial device with very large buffer

2001-02-01 Thread Garst R. Reese
How does this relate to IrDA with SIR speed of 115200 and max turnaround of 500ms? The max throughput is about 5000 bytes in 500ms. Garst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at

Re: Serial device with very large buffer

2001-02-01 Thread Alex Belits
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Joe deBlaquiere wrote: > Hi Alex! > > I'm a little confused here... why are we overrunning? This thing is > running externally at 19200 at best, even if it does all come in as a > packet. Different Merlin -- original Merlin is 19200, "Merlin for Ricochet" is

re: dual athlon

2001-02-01 Thread Andre Hedrick
Hi Dan, I guess that cat is out of the bag. So I will let the other one out now.. On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Dan Hollis wrote: > http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=01/01/31/2156234 > > Does this jive with your tests? > > -Dan > Andre Hedrick Linux ATA Development ASL Kernel

[Patch] DVD bugfix in ide-cd.c

2001-02-01 Thread Fredrik Vraalsen
This is a small patch to Linux kernel 2.4.1 that fixes a problem with DVD playback in OMS (Open Media System). With the stock 2.4.1 kernel OMS will only play up to a certain point on the DVD before it complains about no more data left on input (basically read() returns 0). This patch reverts a

Re: Serial device with very large buffer

2001-02-01 Thread Joe deBlaquiere
Hi Alex! I'm a little confused here... why are we overrunning? This thing is running externally at 19200 at best, even if it does all come in as a packet. I would think the flip buffer would never contain more than a few characters. Are you running it at a higher rate internally? Does

sard on kernel 2.4

2001-02-01 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
Linus, There is a significative amount of people who use sard's additional block layer statistics (I'm one of them). It would be nice to have it in the official free. The available sard code is not optional, which I believe is a valid reason for not merging it in. If so, I can make it

Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0

2001-02-01 Thread Joe deBlaquiere
David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Pavel Machek wrote: > > >> I thought that Vtech Helio folks already have XIP supported... > > > Plenty of people are doing XIP of the kernel. I'm not aware of anyone > doing XIP of userspace pages. uClinux does XIP (readonly) for userspace

Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait/notify + callback chains

2001-02-01 Thread bcrl
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > A kiobuf is 124 bytes, a buffer_head 96. And a buffer_head is additionally > used for caching data, a kiobuf not. Go measure the cost of a distant cache miss, then complain about having everything in one structure. Also, 1 kiobuf maps 16-128

Re: e2fs corruption with 2.4.0-ac12

2001-02-01 Thread Patrice Belleville
On February 1, Wolfgang Wegner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > just for the records, as I saw some reports about fs corruption: I had > a case of e2fs corruption under 2.4.0-ac12 on an IDE drive (Intel BX > chipset) yesterday. I also hadsuch problems twiceon my SonyVAIO

Re: novatel minstrel on 2.4

2001-02-01 Thread Adam Fritzler
Next time, I'll finish reading everything in my l-k mailbox before I post... For the archives: See the thread entitled 'Serial device with very large buffer' started by Alex Belits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for a patch to fix this bug completly. (Thanks for the great timing, Alex.) The modem is now

Re: spelling of disc (disk) in /devfs

2001-02-01 Thread Mike Castle
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 12:19:56AM +, Alan Chandler wrote: > I now find myself confused with the new approach. try "man -k disc" and compare the output with "man -k disk" Since nearly all of the utilities refer to "disk" rather than "disc," it would make more since to be consistent with

Re: novatel minstrel on 2.4

2001-02-01 Thread Joe deBlaquiere
Adam Fritzler wrote: > We've been trying to set up a laptop here to use a Novatel Minstrel PCMCIA > modem (wireless Richocet network). The card shows up as a serial port > (ttySx) and accepts AT commands just like a normal modem. > I'm in the process of bringing up a Novatel Merlin now

Re: problem with devfsd compilation

2001-02-01 Thread Frédéric L. W. Meunier
Georg Nikodym wrote: > Also, RH7's /etc/rc.sysinit can already start devfsd > automatically with the following line: > [ -e /dev/.devfsd -a -x /sbin/devfsd ] && /sbin/devfsd /dev If devfs is mounted and devfsd exists, start devfsd. > So, all you have to do is create an empty file

Re: [PATCH] 2.4.1-ac1 UP-APIC/NMI watchdog fixes

2001-02-01 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 01:37:28 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > > This patch (against 2.4.1-ac1) contains the following fixes: > > * UP-APIC linkage fix: nr_ioapics must be moved from io_apic.c to > > mpparse.c to permit linking the kernel in pure

2.4.1 lvm reiserfs adaptec 2940uw noritake alpha

2001-02-01 Thread Wakko Warner
I have 3 2gb disks in an lvm group (vg is disks) I have an lv of 1.6gb (misc) with reiserfs mounted /lvm/misc I cp /dev/zero /lvm/misc If these 3 drives are on the internal qlogic isp controller, I have no problems. If these 3 drives are on the adaptec aha-2940UW, I get an oops (reply for oops

Re: SO_REUSEADDR redux

2001-02-01 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> This application uses SO_REUSEADDR in conjunction with INADDR_ANY. What >> it does is bind() to INADDR_ANY, then listen(). Then, it proceeds to >> bind (but _not_ listen) various other specific addresses. ac> That should be ok if its setting

Re: SO_REUSEADDR redux

2001-02-01 Thread David S. Miller
Paul D. Smith writes: > I agree, and so does Solaris/FreeBSD, but Linux doesn't. See below for > a test program. Maybe I'm doing something screwed up. I think I'm starting to get a hold on this. Can you do a test for me? Write a small test program, similar to your TCP one, which instead

Re: 3Com 3c523 in IBM PS/2 9585: Can't load module in kernel 2.4.1

2001-02-01 Thread Tom Sightler
> > > eth0: memprobe, Can't find memory at 0xc! > > > 3c523.c: No 3c523 cards found > > > > Yep. Most probably it needs munging to use isa_memcpy_fromio and the like > > or ioremap. > > Right... OK I'll leave that to someone else I have patches that I believe fix this, but their own my

es1371 2.4.1 on noritake alpha

2001-02-01 Thread Wakko Warner
This is just a sample of what I get: es1371: sample rate converter timeout r = 0xeb970800 es1371: sample rate converter timeout r = 0x0087 es1371: sample rate converter timeout r = 0x0097 es1371: sample rate converter timeout r = 0xea80 This card is on the secondary PCI bus. System:

Re: A buglet with LVM-0.9.1

2001-02-01 Thread Alan Cox
> I discovered that lvm seems to have a problem > with compaq raid controllers - the partitions > don't have the normal names like /dev/sda1, > but instead names like /dev/ida/c0d0p1 - Quite a few controllers do this i2o, ida, dac960, .. . The user tools really need to cope with it. Its been

novatel minstrel on 2.4

2001-02-01 Thread Adam Fritzler
We've been trying to set up a laptop here to use a Novatel Minstrel PCMCIA modem (wireless Richocet network). The card shows up as a serial port (ttySx) and accepts AT commands just like a normal modem. It dials fine, PPP connects, gets IPs, etc just as it should. However, any packet over

A buglet with LVM-0.9.1

2001-02-01 Thread J Sloan
Hi, I discovered that lvm seems to have a problem with compaq raid controllers - the partitions don't have the normal names like /dev/sda1, but instead names like /dev/ida/c0d0p1 - lvm seems to works OK, but lvmdiskscan freaks... lvmdiskscan works normally on other systems, which have

Re: kernel ver 2.4.1 VFS problem

2001-02-01 Thread Jagan_Pochimireddy
That problem solved by compiling the correct SCSI driver into the kernel. Now it is the problem with input console. It says Unable to open Input console. This is after mounting VFS. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: kernel ver 2.4.1 VFS problem

2001-02-01 Thread Prasanna P Subash
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:22:03PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > But the driver for my Hard disk is not there in the list, mine is FUJISTU disk > .I think Generic scsi driver will work > > Thanks > Jagan > > Your scsi driver could be compiled into as a module. "mkinitrd" to boot off

Re: AF_UNIX hangs

2001-02-01 Thread David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Yep... Damn, specially split errno and ready values and forgot to use > this. 8) Sorry. Patch applied. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RFC] New Improved Cleaner Whiter Timer Interface

2001-02-01 Thread Daniel Phillips
Since the ->event interface holds the timerlist_lock across the entire ->event call invocation there is no SMP timer add-back race and the timer_enter/exit mechanism isn't needed, so more baggage can go. The timer_enter/exit is therefore moved off the ->event patch to the legacy path. Normal

Re: [PATCH] 2.4.1-ac1 UP-APIC/NMI watchdog fixes

2001-02-01 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > This patch (against 2.4.1-ac1) contains the following fixes: > * UP-APIC linkage fix: nr_ioapics must be moved from io_apic.c to > mpparse.c to permit linking the kernel in pure UP-APIC configs. > * NMI watchdog cleanups: mark

Re: spelling of disc (disk) in /devfs

2001-02-01 Thread Michael B. Trausch
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > To confuse things even more, I have a "Hewlett-Packard 9114 Disc Drive," which > is really a 720K 3.5-inch diskette drive. > > Wayne > Hrm.. hehehe, well, it may be confusing, but I've accepted the public's unwillingness to use the real term.

Re: kernel ver 2.4.1 VFS problem

2001-02-01 Thread CaT
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:22:03PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > But the driver for my Hard disk is not there in the list, mine is FUJISTU disk > .I think Generic scsi driver will work Not the hard disk, the SCSI card... -- CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])*** Jenna has joined the

Re: hard crashes 2.4.0/1 with NE2K stuff

2001-02-01 Thread Alan Cox
> the used board BP6 (abit), apics enabled. non-overclocked. card is a > > 00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. > RTL-8029(AS) Try 2.4.1ac - that should fix it - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: kernel ver 2.4.1 VFS problem

2001-02-01 Thread Jagan_Pochimireddy
But the driver for my Hard disk is not there in the list, mine is FUJISTU disk .I think Generic scsi driver will work Thanks Jagan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at

Re: kernel ver 2.4.1 VFS problem

2001-02-01 Thread CaT
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 03:58:58PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I wamt to use the latest kernel version 2.4.1 . I taken defualt configuration > and built bzImage. When I try to boot with this image it's giving message like > this. > > " VFS:Unable to mount root device 805 or 8:05" > kernel

hard crashes 2.4.0/1 with NE2K stuff

2001-02-01 Thread Roeland Th. Jansen
2.4.1. rebuilt here and with a floodping towards my machine causes a hard crash where nothing works anymore. just before it happens : Feb 1 13:07:24 grobbebol kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out Feb 1 13:07:24 grobbebol kernel: eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt? TSR=0x3,

Re: esp causing crashes..

2001-02-01 Thread Roeland Th. Jansen
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 03:38:28PM -0600, Mark Orr wrote: > I dont like to be the sort of person who, when people report problems, > fires back "it works fine here!"...but...just as a point of reference, > I have a Hayes ESP too -- it's connected to a 56k modem. I havent > had any crashes or

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: VM brokenness, possibly related to reiserfs

2001-02-01 Thread David Ford
My apologies...my internic data isn't updated, http://208.179.0.18/VM/ -d -- There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum - To

Re: 2.4.1 - can't read root fs (devfs maybe?)

2001-02-01 Thread David Ford
"Michael J. Dikkema" wrote: > I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root > filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm > thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs > tree.. is the legacy /dev/hda1 still

kernel ver 2.4.1 VFS problem

2001-02-01 Thread Jagan_Pochimireddy
Hi , I wamt to use the latest kernel version 2.4.1 . I taken defualt configuration and built bzImage. When I try to boot with this image it's giving message like this. " VFS:Unable to mount root device 805 or 8:05" kernel panic "VFS:please append correct "root=\" "VFS:Unable to open root

Re: 2.4.1 - can't read root fs (devfs maybe?)

2001-02-01 Thread David Ford
John Jasen wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > > [Michael J. Dikkema] > > > > I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root > > > > filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm > > > > thinking there might have been a change

Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1

2001-02-01 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:Christoph Rohland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Hi, > > here is the latest version of my tmpfs patch against 2.4.1 > > Have fun > Christoph > > diff -uNr 2.4.1/Documentation/Changes

Re: Serial device with very large buffer

2001-02-01 Thread Alex Belits
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > I also propose to increase the size of flip buffer to 640 bytes (so the > > flipping won't occur every time in the middle of the full buffer), however > > I understand that it's a rather drastic change for such a simple goal, and > > not everyone will

Re: What does "NAT: dropping untracked packet" mean?

2001-02-01 Thread Daniel Pittman
dmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >> On Thu, 01 Feb 2001, Nils Rennebarth wrote: >> > Feb 1 12:58:56 obelix kernel: NAT: 0 dropping untracked packet >> ce767600 1 129.69.22.21 -> 224.0.0.2 >> >> It means that your box drops multicast administrative

Re: What does "NAT: dropping untracked packet" mean?

2001-02-01 Thread Magnus Erixzon
This is explained in the netfilter FAQ. http://netfilter.kernelnotes.org/netfilter-faq-3.html#ss3.1 / Magnus On Thu, 1 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm getting the occasional > > Feb 1 13:17:08 yendi kernel: NAT: 0 dropping untracked packet > c3ea4da0 1 146.188.249.73 ->

Re: Serial device with very large buffer

2001-02-01 Thread Alan Cox
> I also propose to increase the size of flip buffer to 640 bytes (so the > flipping won't occur every time in the middle of the full buffer), however > I understand that it's a rather drastic change for such a simple goal, and > not everyone will agree that it's worth the trouble: Going to a

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: VM brokenness, possibly related to reiserfs

2001-02-01 Thread David Ford
Chris Mason wrote: > Sorry, can't seem to resolve stuph.org. What is kreiserfsd doing during when the >system is waiting for more ram? With JOURNAL_MAX_BATCH set to 100, kreiserfsd will >end up responsible for sending log blocks/metadata to disk and freeing the pinned >buffers. > > -chris

Direct (unbuffered) I/O status ...

2001-02-01 Thread Arun Rao
We're trying to port some code that currently runs on SGI using the IRIX direct I/O facility. From searching the web, it appears that a similar feature either already is or will soon be available under Linux. Could anyone fill me in on what the status is? (I know about mapping block devices to

Fw: Modules and DevFS

2001-02-01 Thread Dan Egli
I just edited my rc.local file to add symlinks of the old names to the files of the new names. Works great for my purposes. -- Dan Egli - Original Message - From: "Michael B. Trausch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "William Knop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday,

Re: obscure bug in vmalloc

2001-02-01 Thread Russell King
duane voth writes: > duane voth wrote: > > ... I've attached a patch that > > can be used to watch for the problem. The following is a 2.2 patch (2.4 > > will follow in a few minutes). If you see "vmalloc error" you might want > > to uncomment the look_for_dangling_pgds function to get a better

Serial device with very large buffer

2001-02-01 Thread Alex Belits
Greg Pomerantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and I have found that Novatel Merlin for Ricochet PCMCIA card, while looking like otherwise ordinary serial PCMCIA device, has the receive buffer 576 bytes long. When regular serial driver reads the arrived data, it often runs out of 512-bytes flip buffer and

Re: What does "NAT: dropping untracked packet" mean?

2001-02-01 Thread dmeyer
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > On Thu, 01 Feb 2001, Nils Rennebarth wrote: > > Feb 1 12:58:56 obelix kernel: NAT: 0 dropping untracked packet > ce767600 1 129.69.22.21 -> 224.0.0.2 > > It means that your box drops multicast administrative packets on the > floor. I'm getting the

Re: spelling of disc (disk) in /devfs

2001-02-01 Thread Harald Arnesen
"Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Webster says (but what did he know), that "disc" is an abbreviation > for "discount", a variation of "disk", or a "phonograph record". The "Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English" (1995 edition) says that a disc is: (also esp

Re: SO_REUSEADDR redux

2001-02-01 Thread Alan Cox
> This application uses SO_REUSEADDR in conjunction with INADDR_ANY. What > it does is bind() to INADDR_ANY, then listen(). Then, it proceeds to > bind (but _not_ listen) various other specific addresses. That should be ok if its setting SO_REUSEADDR > not a security problem: what's really

Re: spelling of disc (disk) in /devfs

2001-02-01 Thread Mike Harrold
> > > > To confuse things even more, I have a "Hewlett-Packard 9114 Disc Drive," which > is really a 720K 3.5-inch diskette drive. > > Wayne My understanding (going back to the 80s) is that the correct term is disc. "disk" is short for diskette. (discette would be pronounced as "dissect"

Re: obscure bug in vmalloc

2001-02-01 Thread duane voth
duane voth wrote: > ... I've attached a patch that > can be used to watch for the problem. The following is a 2.2 patch (2.4 > will follow in a few minutes). If you see "vmalloc error" you might want > to uncomment the look_for_dangling_pgds function to get a better feel for > the pgds that

Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait/notify + callback chains

2001-02-01 Thread Chaitanya Tumuluri
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 06:05:15PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:16:15PM +, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > > > > > > > > No, and with the current kiobufs it would not make sense, because they > > > > are

Re: spelling of disc (disk) in /devfs

2001-02-01 Thread Wayne . Brown
To confuse things even more, I have a "Hewlett-Packard 9114 Disc Drive," which is really a 720K 3.5-inch diskette drive. Wayne "Michael B. Trausch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/31/2001 05:00:34 PM To: "Jeremy M. Dolan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL

obscure bug in vmalloc

2001-02-01 Thread duane voth
I've been abusing vmalloc() recently and stumbled across a rather obscure bug. The code is nearly identical for 2.2 and 2.4 so I suspect it exists in both trees and has been there for quite some time. Under a heavy memory load (when __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL) is occasionally returning NULL)

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: VM brokenness, possibly related to reiserfs

2001-02-01 Thread David Ford
My apologies...my internic data isn't updated, http://208.179.0.18/VM/ -d -- There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum - To

e2fs corruption with 2.4.0-ac12

2001-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Wegner
Hi, just for the records, as I saw some reports about fs corruption: I had a case of e2fs corruption under 2.4.0-ac12 on an IDE drive (Intel BX chipset) yesterday. I was not able to reproduce it, all I can say it seemed to be related to a single file on a 1GB partition, filled about 70%. I

Re: spelling of disc (disk) in /devfs

2001-02-01 Thread Michael B. Trausch
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Jeremy M. Dolan wrote: > > On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 00:19:56 +, Alan Chandler wrote: > > The thing that struck me most was the spelling of disc with a 'c'. As > > an Englishman this is the correct spelling for me most of the time, > > but I have come to accept "as a technical

Re: What does "NAT: dropping untracked packet" mean?

2001-02-01 Thread James Stevenson
Hi do the messages apear when the windows machines a booting ? i would tend to think that the kernel cannot handle the NET on IGMP packets so its printting a message about it the packets do look like they are goign to a multicast address > >Feb 1 12:58:56 obelix kernel: NAT: 0 dropping

Re: Modules and DevFS

2001-02-01 Thread Michael B. Trausch
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, William Knop wrote: > > >One thing that I've noticed with devfs is that all the old-style names are > >symlinks. > > Hmm... I have no symlinks until the module loads. Therefore X sees no > /dev/input/mouse, doesn't ask the kernel for it, the kernel doesn't load the >

SO_REUSEADDR redux

2001-02-01 Thread Paul D. Smith
So, I have an application that works fine on Solaris, FreeBSD, etc. and fails on Linux. This application uses SO_REUSEADDR in conjunction with INADDR_ANY. What it does is bind() to INADDR_ANY, then listen(). Then, it proceeds to bind (but _not_ listen) various other specific addresses. This

Re: 3Com 3c523 in IBM PS/2 9585: Can't load module in kernel 2.4.1

2001-02-01 Thread Alan Cox
> So, I don't know if the 3c523 hardware is OK. Therefore my testing might be > of limited use. However, if you think it would help I'd be happy to be a > test bed for patches to 2.4.1. Let me know what to patch. I'm off work for > a week as of tomorrow lunchtime so the timing is pretty good :)

Bug report

2001-02-01 Thread Anders S. Buch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, It seems that the ide/cdrom/amd756 code can cause some bad lockups, at least on my system. I have an Athlon 500 system running the 2.4.1 kernel with Redhat 6.1 + updated modutils, etc. I just managed to make the kernel lockup as follows: I

Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait /notify + callback chains

2001-02-01 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
Hi, On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 09:33:27PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I think you want the whole kio concept only for disk-like IO. No. I want something good for zero-copy IO in general, but a lot of that concerns the problem of interacting with the user, and the basic center of that

Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0

2001-02-01 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Pavel Machek wrote: > I thought that Vtech Helio folks already have XIP supported... Plenty of people are doing XIP of the kernel. I'm not aware of anyone doing XIP of userspace pages. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"

Re: 3Com 3c523 in IBM PS/2 9585: Can't load module in kernel 2.4.1

2001-02-01 Thread Michael Pacey
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nobody has fixed this driver for 2.4 yet I sort of guessed this > > eth0: 3c523 adapter found in slot 3 > > eth0: 3Com 3c523 Rev 0xe at 0x1300 > > eth0: memprobe, Can't find memory at 0xc! > > 3c523.c: No 3c523 cards found > > Yep. Most probably

Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x

2001-02-01 Thread Alan Chandler
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:06:53 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: >On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:46:08AM -0500, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > >> Yeah, by bios does the same thing too on the Abit KT7(a). > >Ok, I'll remember this. This is most likely the cause of the problems >many people had with the KT7 in the

Re: 2.4.x/alpha/ALI chipset/IDE problems summary Re: 2.4.1 not fullysane on Alpha - file systems

2001-02-01 Thread Andre Hedrick
Sorry, but the ALI code was written based upon ix86 :-( Where were you guys during 2.3.X development? On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, John Jasen wrote: > > The system in question is an API UP1100 based system, running 4 Maxtor > 40gb IDE drives off the ALI M15x3 chipset. > > This applies to kernel 2.4.0

Re: XFS file system Pre-Release

2001-02-01 Thread W1012
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> What support does XFS provide for clustering? >> Pavel > This statement is a little misleading, the clustering software is other > stuff from SGI, they just have xfs filesystems on the

Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x

2001-02-01 Thread safemode
Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:20:00PM -0500, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:46:08AM -0500, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > > > > > > > Yeah, by bios does the same thing too on the Abit KT7(a). > > > > > > Ok, I'll remember this. This is most likely the

Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait /notify + callback chains

2001-02-01 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
Hi, On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 09:33:27PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:34:49PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > In the disk IO case, you basically don't get that (the only thing > > which comes close is raid5 parity blocks). The data which the user > > started with

Re: rlim_t and DNS?

2001-02-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Admin Mailing Lists] > i have no bits directory Really? What version of libc, and on what Linux distro? I thought all versions of glibc2 had /usr/include/bits/. If you are using libc4 or libc5, it is not surprising if the BIND people didn't notice the problem -- they probably didn't try it.

RE: esp causing crashes..

2001-02-01 Thread Mark Orr
On 29-Jan-2001 Roeland Th. Jansen wrote: > [mike -- included you for refs only] > > recently I started to dive into a problem that causes 2.2.x and 2.4.x to > crash at shutdown and when minicom/mgetty is used. e.g. shutdown almost > always crashed the system; if a fax is received, 3 out of 4

Re: XFS file system Pre-Release

2001-02-01 Thread Steve Lord
> Hi! > > > We will be demonstrating XFS as the root file system for high availability > > and clustering solutions in SGI systems at LinuxWorld New York from January > > 31 to February 2. Free XFS CDs will also be available at LinuxWorld. > > What support does XFS provide for clustering? >

[patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1

2001-02-01 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi, here is the latest version of my tmpfs patch against 2.4.1 Have fun Christoph diff -uNr 2.4.1/Documentation/Changes 2.4.1-tmpfs/Documentation/Changes --- 2.4.1/Documentation/Changes Tue Jan 30 11:06:59 2001 +++ 2.4.1-tmpfs/Documentation/Changes Thu Feb 1 22:04:13 2001 @@

[Patch] rename swapfs to tmpfs against 2.4.1-ac1

2001-02-01 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Alan, I decided to rename swapfs to tmpfs for administration but to call it virtual memory fs in Documentation. Further on the wine people asked me to export shmem_file_setup. The attached patch does this an updates the docu. Greetings Christoph diff -uNr

No Subject

2001-02-01 Thread al goldstein
Subject: no networking Moving from 2.2.16 to 2.4.1. I'm running Mandrake 7.0 SMP on an Abit board. There are 2 ether interfaces using 3com 3c59x and 3c509, and the kernel is configured as a router. Updates were made following recommendations in "Changes". Kernel built OK. Netstat -rn and

Re: NT soon to surpass Linux in specweb99 performance?

2001-02-01 Thread J Sloan
Gregory Maxwell wrote: > Looks like TUX caught MS's attention: > http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001211-00082.html > > Anyone know if their method of achieveing this is as flexible as TUX, or is > their "SWC 3.0" simply mean 'spec web cheat' and involve implimenting the >

Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait /notify + callback chains

2001-02-01 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
Hi, On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 09:46:27PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Right now we can take a kiobuf and turn it into a bunch of > > buffer_heads for IO. The io_count lets us track all of those sub-IOs > > so that we know when all submitted IO has completed, so that we can > > pass the

Oops in 2.4.0: [prune_dcache+24/328]

2001-02-01 Thread Andreas Ackermann (Acki)
Hello! after experiencing several oops since installing Kernel 2.4.0 I thought I'd better let someone know there still might be some trouble in the kernel ... Find my very first question at the very bottom of this mail and the answer I got from Petr Vandrovec right below ... I'll try to give

Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0

2001-02-01 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > I wasn't thinking of running the kernel XIP from writable, but even > > trying to do that from the filesystem is a mess. If you're going to be > > that way about it... > > Heh. I am. Read-only XIP is going to be doable, but writable XIP means that > any time you start to write to the

Re: 3Com 3c523 in IBM PS/2 9585: Can't load module in kernel 2.4.1

2001-02-01 Thread Alan Cox
> The machine has a 3Com 3c523 Etherlink/MC card installed. It worked under > 2.2.17 but I can't load the module in 2.4.1. Nobody has fixed this driver for 2.4 yet > eth0: 3c523 adapter found in slot 3 > eth0: 3Com 3c523 Rev 0xe at 0x1300 > eth0: memprobe, Can't find memory at 0xc! >

Re: XFS file system Pre-Release

2001-02-01 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > We will be demonstrating XFS as the root file system for high availability > and clustering solutions in SGI systems at LinuxWorld New York from January > 31 to February 2. Free XFS CDs will also be available at LinuxWorld. What support does XFS provide for clustering?

Re: ACPI breaks maestro

2001-02-01 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Do maestro and acpi share an interrupt on your machine? No. ...and problem went away. Now I have both maestro and ACPI, and maestro works. It did not... Strange. > If so, is maestro's ISR ever getting called? Is ACPI's ISR > (drivers/acpi/events/evsci.c acpi_ev_sci_handler()) getting

WaveLAN Gold Driver...Anyone?

2001-02-01 Thread Bill Wendling
Hi all, Is anyone working on porting the driver for Lucent Technologies's WaveLAN Gold wireless ethernet card to the 2.4.x kernel? Just didn't want to duplicate effort. Thanks! -- || Bill Wendling[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait /notify + callback chains

2001-02-01 Thread Steve Lord
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:56:47PM -0600, Steve Lord wrote: > > And if you are writing to a striped volume via a filesystem which can do > > it's own I/O clustering, e.g. I throw 500 pages at LVM in one go and LVM > > is striped on 64K boundaries. > > But usually I want to have pages 0-63,

Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait /notify + callback chains

2001-02-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:56:47PM -0600, Steve Lord wrote: > And if you are writing to a striped volume via a filesystem which can do > it's own I/O clustering, e.g. I throw 500 pages at LVM in one go and LVM > is striped on 64K boundaries. But usually I want to have pages 0-63, 128-191, etc

Re: 2.4.1 - can't read root fs (devfs maybe?)

2001-02-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[John Jasen] > E upon careful reading of the devfs/devfsd documentation, > you'll find that it says to put /sbin/devfsd /dev in amongst the > first lines in rc.sysinit. > In looking through rc.sysinit, / is not mounted rw until much later. Who said anything about *re*-mounting '/'?

Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait /notify + callback chains

2001-02-01 Thread Steve Lord
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:34:49PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > In the disk IO case, you basically don't get that (the only thing > > which comes close is raid5 parity blocks). The data which the user > > started with is the data sent out

Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x

2001-02-01 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:20:00PM -0500, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:46:08AM -0500, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > > > > > Yeah, by bios does the same thing too on the Abit KT7(a). > > > > Ok, I'll remember this. This is most likely the cause of the problems > > many

Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait /notify + callback chains

2001-02-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Buffer_heads are _sometimes_ used for caching data. Actually they are mostly used, but that should have any value for the discussion... > That's one of the > big problems with them, they are too overloaded, being both IO > descriptors _and_ cache

2.4.x/alpha/ALI chipset/IDE problems summary Re: 2.4.1 not fullysane on Alpha - file systems

2001-02-01 Thread John Jasen
The system in question is an API UP1100 based system, running 4 Maxtor 40gb IDE drives off the ALI M15x3 chipset. This applies to kernel 2.4.0 and 2.4.1. The drives are identified as follows from hdparm: Model=Maxtor 54098H8, FwRev=DAC10SC0, SerialNo=K80F1ZFC Is also has an Adaptec 29160

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >