Hi all,
16x50 serial driver doesn't check ioremap() return value.
Atached patch should fix this it.
Best regards.
--
Andrey Panin| Embedded systems software engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| PGP key: http://www.orbita1.ru/~pazke/AndreyPanin.asc
diff -ur
Hello!
I was writing a bug report (parport slow, resources
problems?),
when I tried something strange and OOPS.
The original report is included in the last part of this
email.
After writing the report, I disabled parport resources in BIOS
and I maked:
cate3:~# modprobe parport_pc
Unable to
John Levon wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > The only case in schedule_timeout() which does not call schedule() does
> > set tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING explicitly before returning. Therefore, any
> > code which unconditionally calls schedule_timeout()
Usual spot:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.2-2.diff.gz
Changes since last installment:
1) More errors in TCP receive queue collapser are discovered and
fixed.
2) Several URG handling details on receive side are made more
consistent and sane.
3)
I need help from somebody.
Iwant to install Linux with just floppythrough FTP server.
I am searching in net regarding How to make FTP installation floppy .
can any body pls refer some web sites or procedure?.
thanks
srinivas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
[Peter Bergner]
> The following is a boot log for a 64 bit port of Linux for IBM's 64
> bit PowerPC processors. This log was made on a pSeries model 270
> which uses a POWER3 microprocessor.
Impressive. One question, though --
> starting cpu /cpus/PowerPC,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> starting cpu
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:"Quim K Holland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> I've been looking at various -ac patches for the last couple of
> weeks and have been wondering why only this piece of difference
> still remains between Linus' 2.4.2 and
On Thursday February 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Neil Brown wrote:
> >
> > Certainly I would like to not hold the BKL so much, but I'm curious
> > how much effect it will really have. Do you have any data on the
> > effect of this change?
>
> Depends very much on the
I've been looking at various -ac patches for the last couple of
weeks and have been wondering why only this piece of difference
still remains between Linus' 2.4.2 and Alan's -ac2. All the other
diffs in i387.c from 2.4.1-ac2 seem to have been merged into Linus
tree at around 2.4.2-pre1. Could
In your message of: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:37:15 PST, you write:
>Hmm.. You shouldn't be loading any i82365 module at all. You should load
>the "yenta_socket" module.
I had gone back to my old ways of useing the external PCMCIA stuff.
Here are the relevant lspci --vvxx listings using the yenta
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> Situation: SAP R/3 + SAP DB + benchmark driver running on a
> single node 4 CPU SMP machine, tuned down to 1GB of RAM.
>
> Running the SAP benchmark with 75 users on 2.2 yields for the
> first benchmark run:
>
> - 7018ms average response time
> -
> IBM withdrew the proposal.
... from public view
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> I took your advice and used the kernel drivers from 2.4.2. I built
> the Cardbus and i82365 drivers into the kernel. This shows the exact
> same behavior, after a power-on reboot I get:
You don't need the i82365 driver, only the Cardbus (yenta) driver. I don't
think this would cause your
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Jeff Lessem wrote:
>
> No problem, the listings are below. Both listings were done on a
> freshly booted system. The only difference in system states was that
> the i82365 modules had loaded.
Hmm.. You shouldn't be loading any i82365 module at all. You should load
the
"Kurt V. Hindenburg" wrote:
>
> asm-i386:
> init/main.o(.text.init+0x63): undefined reference to `__buggy_fxsr_alignment'
>
> I don't recall this error in 2.4.0, but it is present in 2.4.1 and was not
> fixed in 2.4.2.
>
> >sh scripts/ver_linux
> -- Versions installed: (if some fields are
In your message of: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:40:03 PST, you write:
>Can you do a full "lspci -vvxxx" (as root) both on a working and a
>non-working setup, and send the two files to the kernel list and cc to
>me?
No problem, the listings are below. Both listings were done on a
freshly booted system.
This is not the real problem. Loopback is just broken.
Jim Murray wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Compiling with kgcc compiler from RedHat 7.0 breaks loopback in the
> way you describe on 2.4.2-prex kernels and I suspect also in the real 2.4.2.
>
> Jim
>
--
Red Hat 7.x running nicely on a number of machines
here w/ no problem, with all apologies to the Red Hat
bashers -
The real problem is loopback is broken, and the
fix still needs to be merged.
In the meantime, Jens Axboe's loop patches will
make it work -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Just looking at R5 I knew it wasn't going to do well in this application
> because it's similar to a number of hash functions I tried with the same
> idea in mind: to place similar names together in the same leaf block.
> That turned out to be not
Unresolved symbols in mkdep.o.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
asm-i386:
init/main.o(.text.init+0x63): undefined reference to `__buggy_fxsr_alignment'
I don't recall this error in 2.4.0, but it is present in 2.4.1 and was not
fixed in 2.4.2.
>sh scripts/ver_linux
-- Versions installed: (if some fields are empty or look
-- unusual then possibly you have
HTFS, which is the default filesystem for SCO OpenServer 5, is pretty
rare.
--Carl
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Quim K Holland wrote:
> Received: from localhost (localhost.unixexchange.com [127.0.0.1])
> by topgun.unixexchange.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
> f1N2h0t00700
> for ;
In your message of: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:19:15 EST, you write:
>I'm a little confused by what you mean when you say PCMCIA modules, are you
>referring to the actual PCMCIA socket drivers themselves? If so, perhaps
Yes, the i82365 module does not load.
>this is why you have problems and I don't.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 18:46:24 -0800,
LA Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Any ideas why? Not that I'm whining, but a good debugger with a 'watch' capability
>would do wonders at this point.
kdb - bpha audit_state dataw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compiling with kgcc compiler from RedHat 7.0 breaks loopback in the
way you describe on 2.4.2-prex kernels and I suspect also in the real 2.4.2.
Jim
> Please CC me on replies. I just joined the list and don't want
> to miss any replies.
>
> I have
apm --suspend causes my system to hang under 2.4.2 and
2.4.2ac1. it was working fine under 2.4.1ac19.
looking at syslog it appears that the driver for my
xircom pcmcia card may be involved -- it was the last
entry on two of three occasions. the latest lockup
(under 2.4.1ac1) left no trace in
go to http://walbran.org/sean/linux/stodolsk/ and download the driver.
It's running on 2.4.2!
Jeff
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Trevor J. Clout wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found you on this page
>http://www.appwatch.com/lists/linux-kernel/Week-of-Mon-20010115/017063.html
>
> How did you go getting a Lucent
loopback is broken in 2.4.2 AFAIK. You can grab the loop-6 patch and
apply it to 2.4.2 and it should work.
You should also upgrade modutils to 2.4.2 as it's required by 2.4.2 (so
says the Change file anyways).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Any ideas as to what is wrong?
> The only thing I can
This is in kernel 2.4.2. I don't really know how long this has been
going on, but I would guess that it's been like this since I got my
board (the performance has been the same throughout).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
I knew my performance hit had to be coming from somewhere...
I'm using an MSI K7T Pro mtherboard (KT133 chipset) and a Voodoo3 2000.
I can't seem to set bus mastering on the AGP card at all. This does not
work:
setpci -s 01:00.0 4.w=0007 (setpci -s 01:00.0 4.w gives me 0003)
Nor does:
Just looking at R5 I knew it wasn't going to do well in this application
because it's similar to a number of hash functions I tried with the same
idea in mind: to place similar names together in the same leaf block.
That turned out to be not very important compared to achieving
I have a kernel driver that has a variable (surprise) 'audit_state'. It's statically
initialized to 0 in the C code. The only way it can get set on is if the audit modules
are loaded and one makes a system call to enable it.
There is no 'driver' initialization performed.
This code seemed to
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I raised the numbers a little bit more. Now with 128MB RAM in the box we can
> > handle a maximum of 7000 connections. No more because we start to swap too
> > much.
>
> Really? Well, it is unlikely to have something with net.
> Your dumps show
--
Best regards,
michael mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
I have come to the pont of having to mail this list in search of a greater
understanding of what I could possibably be doing wrong in reguards to
enabling my sound card. Under 2.2.X I was able to include the cards
configuration during the config, yes, I understand that this has changed
in opt
>> idea of using crc32 as the default hash function
> I once liked those things, too - but I've learned better since.
> A universal class of hashing functions is a class with the property that
> given any input, the average performance of all the functions is good.
> For example, h(k) = (a * k
Russell King writes:
> With CONFIG_SYSCTL=n, I get the following warnings:
>
> sysctl_net_ipv4.c:50: warning: `tcp_retr1_max' defined but not used
> sysctl_net_ipv4.c:52: warning: `ip_local_port_range_min' defined but not used
> sysctl_net_ipv4.c:53: warning: `ip_local_port_range_max'
Russell King writes:
> The following patch fixes these warnings:
Thanks, applied.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Hi,
This is a patch that makes the __io_virt_debug use conditional. It is mainly
the patch submitted by Jeff Garzik but without the extra configs and a short
text in Configure.help.
(plz check help for my english...)
= patch-mmio-debug
diff -ruN
> "DW" == David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DW> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 07:57:07PM -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
>> > anyone can suggest some good FS that can install linux?
>> > exclude reiserfs, ext2, ext3, DOS FAT..etc
>> > just need non-normal or non-popular FS, any suggestion?
>>
Please CC me on replies. I just joined the list and don't want
to miss any replies.
I have been running 2.4.1-pre10 for quite some time with no
problems. I just upgraded to 2.4.2 and everything seem to work
fine until I did... (as root or course)
mount -t iso9660 -o loop,ro mycdimage.iso
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 07:57:07PM -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
> > anyone can suggest some good FS that can install linux?
> > exclude reiserfs, ext2, ext3, DOS FAT..etc
> > just need non-normal or non-popular FS, any suggestion?
>
> How about minixfs? >=)
ADFS, AFFS, BFS or HPFS are all
Thus spake Alan Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > There will be a lot fewer metadata index
> > > blocks in your directory file, for one thing.
> > Oh yes, another thing: a B-tree directory structure does not need
> > metadata index blocks.
> Before people get excited about complex tree directory
> anyone can suggest some good FS that can install linux?
> exclude reiserfs, ext2, ext3, DOS FAT..etc
> just need non-normal or non-popular FS, any suggestion?
How about minixfs? >=)
--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 03:35:12PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Gabi Davar wrote:
> >
> > Hello I have two questions regarding Linux 2.0.x
> >
> > 1. Did anybody tried running Linux 2.0.x on the Intel i840 chipset based
> > boards?
> >
> > 2. Does anybody knows of a 2.0.x driver for Intel's
The following is a boot log for a 64 bit port of Linux for IBM's 64 bit
PowerPC processors. This log was made on a pSeries model 270 which uses
a POWER3 microprocessor.
-- The Linux for PowerPC-64 team from IBM.
Dave Engebretsen
Peter Bergner
Todd Inglett
Pat Mccarthy
Don Reed
hey all, trouble again
anyone can suggest some good FS that can install linux?
exclude reiserfs, ext2, ext3, DOS FAT..etc
just need non-normal or non-popular FS, any suggestion?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 07:44:11PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> The global limit on top of the per-queue limit sounds good.
Probably.
> Since you're talking about the "total_ram / 3" hardcoded value... it
> should be /proc tunable IMO. (Andi Kleen already suggested this)
Yes, IIRC Andi
"H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
> Bill Crawford wrote:
...
> > We use Solaris and NFS a lot, too, so large directories are a bad
> > thing in general for us, so we tend to subdivide things using a
> > very simple scheme: taking the first letter and then sometimes
> > the second letter or a pair of
Mike Castle wrote:
> (libc does usually take care to be able to build against a later kernel
> version than you're running on, and determine at run time what features may
> or may not be there, so one could have a 2.4.2 kernel handy to build libc
> against while still running a 2.2.18 kernel.
From: Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:16:32 -0700 (MST)
One important question as to the disk format is whether the "." and ".."
interception by VFS is a new phenomenon in 2.4 or if this also happened
in 2.2? If so, then having these entries on disk
Gabi Davar wrote:
>
> Hello I have two questions regarding Linux 2.0.x
>
> 1. Did anybody tried running Linux 2.0.x on the Intel i840 chipset based
> boards?
>
> 2. Does anybody knows of a 2.0.x driver for Intel's 82543GC Gigabit Ethernet
> MAC (aka e1000) ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Best
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> However if you have houndred of different queues doing I/O at the same
> time it may make a difference, but probably with tons of harddisks
> you'll also have tons of ram... In theory we could put a global limit
> on top of the the per-queue one.
Bill Crawford wrote:
>
> A particular reason for this, apart from filesystem efficiency,
> is to make it easier for people to find things, as it is usually
> easier to spot what you want amongst a hundred things than among
> a thousand or ten thousand.
>
> A couple of practical examples from
In fact, has anyone got it working under 2.2 (for any kernels later than 2.2.5)?
I'd like to get it to work with 2.2.16. I'd be *delighted* if it worked with
2.4.x.
The OOPSes caused by the Adaptec driver are officially on my list of things to
look in to.
..but so are many, many, many
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 11:57:00PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> unsane to wait kupdate to submit 10G of ram to a single harddisk before
> unplugging on a 30G machine.
actually kupdate will unplug itself the queue but in theory it can grow the
queue still up to such level after the I/O
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:40:55PM -0800, Robert Read wrote:
> Ok, my bad, I forgot about cross-compiles. The problem was
> scripts/split-include.c includes errno.h, which requires linux/errno.h
> to exist, and I thought it would be better to use the current kernel's
> version, rather than the
I was hoping to point out that in real life, most systems that
need to access large numbers of files are already designed to do
some kind of hashing, or at least to divide-and-conquer by using
multi-level directory structures.
A particular reason for this, apart from filesystem efficiency,
is
I was looking around for the answer to this question and I only found this
question over and over again but not the answer.
So is there support for this adaptec 2100S raid card under 2.4.x? Is there a
reciepe?
Thank you in advance for any help.
--Doug
-Original
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Daniel writes:
> > All references to "." and ".." are now intercepted and never reach the
> > filesystem level.
>
> Ted writes:
> >From: Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >I'll leave that up to somebody else - we now have two alternatives, the
> >100%,
Catalin BOIE wrote:
> i got in syslog the message: "ide0: Speed warnings UDMA 3/4/5 is not
> functional"!
>
> What is the problem?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
Wasn't dma disabled on all VIA ide chipsets because of sporadic corruption?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Hi Alan,
This patch fixes a problem doing ifconfig up, down and then up again, and
getting ENODEV. That broke pump, among other things.
Please apply.
Thanks,
Ion
--
It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
than to open it and remove all doubt.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 06:40:48PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> You want to throttle IO if the amount of on flight data is higher than
> a given percentage of _main memory_.
>
> As far as I can see, your patch avoids each individual queue from being
> bigger than the high watermark (which is
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > is it possible that you send a list of all the changes in 2.4.2ac1
> > compared to plain 2.4.2?
>
> I doubt Alan has time for requests like this (but more power to him, if
> he does)...
>...
Alan already told me in a private mail that
On 02.22 Alan Cox wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
>
Patching 2.4.2:
patching file include/linux/raid/md_k.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 17 with fuzz 2 (offset 2 lines).
I think it's because the line:
18: #include
is already present, and patch tries to add
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 05:48:35AM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> Ok, it appears that some people want the __FILE__, __LINE__ (or equivalent)
> in BUG() and some don't. Fair enough. I used the existing config option
> CONFIG_DEBUG_ERRORS to allow people to choose. There was also interest
> in
>> hdf: timeout waiting for DMA
>> ide_dmaproc : chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only : 14
>> hdf : irq timeout : status=0x48 {DriveReady DataRequest }
>> hdf : DMA disabled
>> ide2 : reset : master : error (0x0a?)
>> ***
>>
>> I would like to know what the probem is.
>> I
Ok, my bad, I forgot about cross-compiles. The problem was
scripts/split-include.c includes errno.h, which requires linux/errno.h
to exist, and I thought it would be better to use the current kernel's
version, rather than the system version. I guess not.
robert
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at
> > [1.] Upon boot, the 2.4.1 kernel misconfigures one of two 3c509b NICs
> > installed in my computer as "BNC" rather than "10baseT".
>
> > Boot messages for eth0 in kernel 2.2:
> > eth0: 3c509 at 0x300 tag 1, 10baseT port, address 00 a0 24 e9 8d a1, IRQ 10.
> > and in 2.4:
> > eth0:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> >
> > In the first heat of hash races - creating 20,000 files in one directory
> > - dentry::hash lost out to my original hack::dx_hash, causing a high
> > percentage of leaf blocks to remain exactly half full and slowing
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:59:20AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > I'd prefer for this check to be a per-queue one.
>
> I'm running this in my tree since a few weeks, however I never had the courage
> to post it publically because I didn't
> FINDHPATH = $(HPATH)/asm $(HPATH)/linux $(HPATH)/scsi $(HPATH)/net
>
> HOSTCC = gcc
> -HOSTCFLAGS = -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
> +HOSTCFLAGS = -I$(HPATH) -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
That seems odd. Which build tools need
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Robert Read wrote:
> Please apply one line patch to the top level Makefile. This points
> the build tools at the correct linux include dir.
Or please don't, it's incorrect.
It breaks cross-compiling, and just generally wrong. If your
system won't build without this, it's
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 22 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > The following piece of code in ll_rw_block() aims to limit the number of
> > > locked buffers by making processes throttle on IO if the number of on
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:48:19PM +0100, Lukasz Trabinski demoed 2.4.2:
Complementing the 2.4.2 demo, here is same from 2.2.* also at 6BONE:
$ ping6 3ffe:8010:19::2:2
PING 3ffe:8010:19::2:2(3ffe:8010:19::2:2) from 3ffe:2610:2:fe00:290:27ff:fe85:1530 :
56 data bytes
64 bytes from
Scott A McConnell writes:
> I am running RedHat Linux version 2.2.16-3 on my PC and Hardhat Linux
> version 2.4.0-test5 on my MIPS board. Any thoughts or suggestions?
>
> I saw a discussion start on the ARM list along these lines but I never
> saw a solution.
The problem is partly caused by
Hi guys
I have a HPT370 controler card, with a 60 gigs Maxtor IDE drive
Card BIOS detects it to be UDMA5.
It happens that the system hangs (seems it is especially when system has been up for
more than 24 hours)(this is home box)
Here is output it gives me:
***
hdf: timeout
I am looking for some program can edit and add effect to .avi, .mpg..etc
files, I tried to compile boardcast 2000c, but it's not work ( maybe
missing some file in the release)
anyway , please help me if you can, Thanks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
In article <007101c09ce4$39dc7680$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Linux-2.4.2 does not have IPv6 support ???
[root@lt /root]# ping6 3ffe:8010:19::2:2
PING 3ffe:8010:19::2:2(3ffe:8010:19::2:2) from ::1 : 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 3ffe:8010:19::2:2: icmp_seq=0 hops=64 time=84 usec
64 bytes from
I am trying to set up a Linux box as a bridge that will limit
throughput (and maybe even introduce delays in forwarding). I
am running 2.2.16-22 (RedHat 7.0). I have bridging working
between two lan cards.
I thought maybe I could limit transmit speed on one lan card
with shaper0 and limit the
I think your problem is removing all optimization
(removing '-O2' when kgdb option is enabled).
I realize that debugging is easier with no optimization
but the kernel compile always spilled registers for me
when using -O0. I can do -O1 or -O2 with no problem.
Paul Fulghum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Well - I'm not sure that this is a good idea. When PIDs increase
> monotonically, chances are very small that the race condition implicit in
> sending any signal to a process
There are definitely plans to do this, and in fact on IA64 ACPI is already
used to obtain PCI routing. However, IA32 ACPI efforts have been focused on
other things, since we assumed MPS tables would be around for a while
longer. I guess that is no longer a correct assumption.
So yes, there are
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:35:35PM +0100, Heusden, Folkert van wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Folkert!
> I wrote a patch against 2.2.18 and 2.4.1 to have the kernel generate
> random PIDs. You can find it at http://vanheusden.com/Linux/security.php3
> (amongst other patches). Beware: pretty much experimental
A problem that I seem to have noticed to some extent or another in the 2.4 series
is that while the elevator algorithm may achieve best disk bandwidth utilization,
it seems to be heavily at the expense of interactive use.
I was running a disk intensive program over nfs, so the nfsd's were quite
Greetings,
I have been sucessfully able to take Amit S. Kale ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
kgdb patch for 2.4.0-test9, and create a patch for 2.4.0-test12.
I am trying to create a patch for 2.4.1.. but gcc barfs with the
following:
-
Any suggestions would be aprreciated. Symbolic reference problem.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
If it's a VALinux computer, contact them.
They've made some progress in tracking different eepro100 problems.
Andrey
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 08:32:07PM +0200, Ionut Dumitrache wrote:
> The integrated LAN on Intel boards with i815 chipset
> apparently is not fully supported. In
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
(Seemingly) random file system corruption
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
The other day, I downloaded the latest version (at the time) of the kernel:
2.4.1. I had made the kernel a couple times, and had done "make distclean" a
couple times.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> is it possible that you send a list of all the changes in 2.4.2ac1
> compared to plain 2.4.2?
I doubt Alan has time for requests like this (but more power to him, if
he does)...
His patch is diff'd against 2.4.2, so just look at the patch.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Mares) wrote on 22.02.01 in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> One could avoid this, but it would mean designing the whole filesystem in a
> completely different way -- merge all directories to a single gigantic
> hash table and use (directory ID,file name) as a key, but we were
Hi,
Gigabyte (and/or AMI and/or VIA) decided that it is not worth
of effort to create full mptable and since version F5a for 6VXD7
they do not report PCI interrupts as 16-19, but only as traditional
0-15 (and they do not report them as conforms/conforms, but as
active-lo/level).
For now
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Phillips) wrote on 20.02.01 in
<01022020011905.18944@gimli>:
> But the current hash function is just a place holder, waiting for
> an better version based on some solid theory. I currently favor the
> idea of using crc32 as the default hash function, but I welcome
>
I am getting NFS errors/warnings
VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem).
Freeing unused kernel memory: 196k freed
nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch
expected (0x806/0x6246a), got (0x806/0x62b48)
^/var/run/utmp
^/var/log/wtmp**
I hate to pollute your mailboxes with stuff that almost certainly
doesn't concern you, but my ISP went down for about 6-7 hours yesterday
after I posted this.. So, um, if you couldn't get in - please try
again!
(Sorry to the rest of ya'..)
- Words by Jay Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010221
In reply to message
From: Lazarus Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: (BUG) 3c509b and kernel 2.4.x
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:13:59 -0800
(Replying to my own message. :-/ )
>Non-modular support for 3Com EtherLinkIII cards, specifically the ISA
>3c509b, worked fine in kernel 2.2.18.
See:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/17107.html
IBM withdrew the proposal.
mordy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > three Netgear NICs and am experiencing considerable trouble with the=20
> > combination:
> >
> > Kernel 2.4.[01]:ifconfig shows that the card see's traffic on t=
> > he=20
> > network, but does not transmit anything (no response to ping).
>
> Use
Hi,
Using the pdc202xx version 0.30 driver for a Promise 20265
chip under the 2.4.0 kernel I'm getting file system
corruptions. Whats odd though is that e2fsck can't correct
the corrupted file systems. Here is the setup :-
Hardware: AMD Athlon
Asus A7V motherboard
Via Apollo
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:55:28 -0500,
Heitzso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>ld: cannot open binary: no such file or directory
Binutils incompatibility. Linus, please apply.
Index: 2.1/arch/i386/boot/Makefile
--- 2.1/arch/i386/boot/Makefile Fri, 05 Jan 2001 13:42:29 +1100 kaos
1 - 100 of 366 matches
Mail list logo
