[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I went ahead and implemented the change last night anyway and I
> will submit the patches and see if it will be accepted or not.
> The idea is that it first check in arch/$ARCH/Configure.help
> and if the file or the help is not found there,
> check Documentation/Conf
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Quoting "Robert A. Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [snip]
> > Apr 5 18:15:14 ryoko kernel: hdb: task_no_data_intr: status=0x51 {
> > DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> > Apr 5 18:15:14 ryoko kernel: hdb: task_no_data_intr: error=0x04 {
> > DriveStatusErr
Quoting "Robert A. Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
> Apr 5 18:15:14 ryoko kernel: hdb: task_no_data_intr: status=0x51 {
> DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> Apr 5 18:15:14 ryoko kernel: hdb: task_no_data_intr: error=0x04 {
> DriveStatusError }
> Apr 5 18:15:14 ryoko kernel: hdb: Write Cache
Sorry about that, that last email had an old address on it, this address should work
for replies/cc's:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordo
After I installed 2.4.3, my system would seemingly randomly hadn, about once a
day. It hung at least 3 times, but it looks like theres only entries in my
syslog for 2 of those times, my system is an AMD Thununderbird 1Ghz, 256MB RAM,
VIA KX133A chipset (Abit KT7A), if there's any other info you
I went ahead and implemented the change last night anyway and I
will submit the patches and see if it will be accepted or not.
The idea is that it first check in arch/$ARCH/Configure.help
and if the file or the help is not found there,
check Documentation/Configure.help.
I believe there is an adv
You write:
> Can you copy me your reply(s) to my post? For some unknown reason, I am
> getting very few messages from the list, and I saw your reply in the
> archives. So far I haven't even got my own post back...
That's because the last time I replied to your email, it bounced. Something
bad
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Why do it from user space? Simply add a printk() to sys_init_module() or
> similar.
Agreed, but at that point the solution has absolutely nothing to do with
insmod anymore. :-)
Besides, as you said, I don't really see the point. It certainly doesn
Ion writes:
> Andrew Daviel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a good reason why insmod should not call syslog() to log
> > any module that gets installed ?
>
> Simple: you'll have quite a bit of a problem if you are trying to insmod
> the module with support for AF_UNIX sockets. :-)
Why d
Right after a boot, I got 5 oopsen within about 8 minutes. There are
only two unique ones, which are attached. Each one occured at least
twice. Someone know what's going on?
--
-Steven
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four.
ksymoops 2.3.4 on i586 2.4.3. Options used
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
OOPS report for L2 cacheable size setting at 512MB on TD5TH dual P200
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
My system board BIOS has two settings for L2 cacheable size: 64MB and
512MB. Previous kernels would lock when initialising the
framebuffer. Th
Dawson Engler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> enclosed are three bugs found in the 2.4.1 kernel by an extension
> that checks that kmalloc calls allocate enough memory. It examines all
> callsites of the form:
> p = [kv]malloc(nbytes);
> and issues an error if
> sizeof *p < nbytes
[..
--On Thursday, April 05, 2001 15:38:41 -0700 "Timothy D. Witham"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Database performance:
> Raw storage I/O performance
>OLTP workload
You probably want to add an OLAP scenario as well.
--Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send th
I recently upgraded my desktop machine to 2.2.19 plus
the ide.2.2.19.03252001.patch available from kernel.org
so that I may use DMA with my VIA 82C686A controller.
Now, when I attempt to mount or otherwise access
/dev/hdb, I get the following error:
Apr 5 18:15:14 ryoko kernel: hdb: task_no_data
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Albert D. Cahalan" wrote:
> >
> > > I'm running the 2.4.3 kernel and my system always (!) crashes when I try
> > > to generate the "Linux kernel poster" from lgp.linuxcare.com.au. After
> > > working for one hour, the kernel printed this message:
> >
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 08:49:51AM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
>
> Does anybody have bad experience with gcc-2.95.3?
>
> I'm using gcc-2.95.2 with linux 2.4.3 and have no problem with it.
I've built and using 2.4.2 with 2.95.3 with no issues. [I should say, with
no more issues than I have normally
I have a Tyan S1867 (Server Set III HE) for which I'd like to have AGP
support. Here's the relevant output of lspci -v :
00:00.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20HE (rev 22)
Flags: fast devsel
Memory at fa00 (32-bit, prefetchable) [disabled] [size=32M]
Memory at feafb00
I'm getting some interesting behavior with the 2.4.3 serial driver and
agetty.
This system uses the onboard serial port (ttyS0) for a serial console
(console=ttyS0,38400) along with the VGA port. If I try to start an
agetty on this line (agetty -L ttyS0 38400), it gets as far as
outputting "Debi
ov511 supports compression, but it doesn't always work yet. Even with
compression, you will only get 12-15 FPS at 640x480 at most. USB just can't do
better than that with this type of compression algorithm.
If you want to try compression, use the "compress=1" and "ttpp=1" parameters
with the ov51
PROBLEM:
kernel 2.4.3 will not boot on systems with initrd files
DESCRIPTION
Building kernel 2.4.3 and attempting to boot it failed. The problem
turned out to be in the modutils-2.4.5 rpm for i386.
DETAIL
After building the 2.4.3 kernel and moving the boot modules to the
initrd image, i
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001 17:57:48 -0700 (PDT), Andrew Daviel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a good reason why insmod should not call syslog() to log
> any module that gets installed ?
Simple: you'll have quite a bit of a problem if you are trying to insmod
the module with support for AF_UNIX s
You should be ok :)
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Jeff Chua wrote:
>
> Does anybody have bad experience with gcc-2.95.3?
>
> I'm using gcc-2.95.2 with linux 2.4.3 and have no problem with it.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
> [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe li
Hi!
> > Any idea if suspend/hybernation will be in future kernels?
>
> I'd like it included, too. Some toshiba laptops support sleep but not
> suspend, and battery runs out within few hours if it was low before
> suspend. That's bad.
>
> And the patch was pretty clean last time I checked.
>
Is there a good reason why insmod should not call syslog() to log
any module that gets installed ? I know things like bttv get very verbose
in the module itself, and I tried patching insmod to log the first
argument and it seemed to work for me.
I was looking at the knark LKM rootkit and wonderi
Does anybody have bad experience with gcc-2.95.3?
I'm using gcc-2.95.2 with linux 2.4.3 and have no problem with it.
Thanks,
Jeff
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info a
Timothy D. Witham wrote :
[...]
> I propose that we work on setting up a straight forward test harness
> that allows developers to quickly test a kernel patch against
> various performance yardsticks.
[...
(proposed large server testbeds)
...]
I like this idea, but could the testbeds also inc
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:40:36AM -0700, Grover, Andrew wrote:
> I'm confused. 3c59x.c has a little acpi WOL stuff, but that's it.
I tried "#ifdef 0"-ing the set_WOL function body( empty function ) in
3c59x.c and enabled acpi and built another kernel
and I still have the problem.
So its NOT a
André Dahlqvist wrote:
>
> Dawson Engler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > enclosed are three bugs found in the 2.4.1 kernel by an extension
>
> Why are you guys running these tests against an already old kernel?
> I would suggest running it against at least Linus' latest version, or
> preferably Ala
Andy Chou wrote:
> [BUG]
> /u2/acc/oses/linux/2.4.3/drivers/net/tokenring/tmsisa.c:274:tms_isa_probe:
>ERROR:NULL:273:274: Using
> unknown ptr "card" illegally! set by 'kmalloc':273
fixed
> [BUG]
> /u2/acc/oses/linux/2.4.3/drivers/pcmcia/rsrc_mgr.c:199:do_io_probe:
>ERROR:NULL:191:199: Using
Dawson Engler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> enclosed are three bugs found in the 2.4.1 kernel by an extension
Why are you guys running these tests against an already old kernel?
I would suggest running it against at least Linus' latest version, or
preferably Alan's -ac tree.
--
André Dahlqvist <
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 08:36:27PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> Somebody reminded me in private email that we finally have a reasonable
> console documentation in console_codes(4).
To me "finally" sounds as if this happy state was achieved only recently.
But console_codes.4 is from Mon Oct 31 22
Exellent idea
Assuming that you have set up these environments already,
what would be a real treat is to get the average runqueue
length at a given time, for instance every second or so, while
running some of these more sophisticated server oriented applications
that you mention.
>From that
Hi all.
Ok, maybe this isn't the right list for this question. In 2.2.x the
parport_probe module extracted the ieee1284 device id correctly and added to the
proc fs. However this doesn't seem to work for me in 2.4.x
I only have one device to test it on and since I know there have been some
diffic
Why is it that 2.2.x UFS write support is considered (experimental)?
-Andrew
On Sun, 17 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > FWIW, I downloaded install 'floppyC28.fs' from openbsd web site.
> >
> > OK. So did I.
> >
> > % md5sum floppyC28.fs
> > 2ae3c61008df5accdfb132f20e744bfb floppyC28
Hi,
lately having upgraded my DUal-BX motherboard to two PIII-850 CPUs, I run
into some trouble.
FIrst, I had had an assymetric configuration (iPIII-850 + iPII-350) , which
Linux did not support; I created a fix and sent it to LKML. It worked
perfectly, i.e. without the problems described below.
enclosed are three bugs found in the 2.4.1 kernel by an extension
that checks that kmalloc calls allocate enough memory. It examines all
callsites of the form:
p = [kv]malloc(nbytes);
and issues an error if
sizeof *p < nbytes
I think they're all currently harmless because of kmal
I have been following this thread and thinking that everybody has some truth in
what they are saying but with the absence of a repeatable test environment there
really isn't a way of arriving at a data driven decision.
Given the following conditions.
1)The diversity of the problem sets that
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001 12:52:28 -0400 (EDT), Richard B. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Only an observation:
>
>
> main()
> {
>nice(19);
>for(;;)
>sched_yield();
> }
>
> does...
>
[...]
>
> It consumes 99.1 percent CPU, just spinning.
And, umm, what *exactly* would you ex
Rogier Wolff wrote:
> I'm not sure if Larry's CML2 has the help for the options near the
^^ ehhhm. That's Eric. Sorry.
Roger.
--
** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! -
Erik Mouw wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:28:33PM +0200, Johan Adolfsson wrote:
> > Would it be a good idea to have support for multiple Configure.help
> > files in the config system?
> > The main advantage would be that arch specific settings could
> > have an arch specific help file as well.
> From: Trever L. Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I do have a question that you might be able to answer.
>
> Since I left the 2.2.x series of kernels, my harddrives never
> spin down
> now. I do not know what else doesn't sleep. This is the
> case with APM
> (on a box that doesn't crash
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 06:09:28PM +0300, Ville Herva wrote:
> I wonder if there might still be a bug in 2.0.39 sys_new(l)stat.
> Today, one of my trustworthy servers crashed (see details below), and
> it has actually given me two slightly similar looking oopses before.
>
> While this might be a
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Thomas Speck wrote:
IIRC the driver doesn't support compression, and there is no way you can
get 640x480 uncompressed at 30 fps over USB...
/cyr
>
> Hi
>
> I am trying to get working a Spacec@m 300 (USB) by Trust. I tried this
> under 2.2.18 and 2.4.3. In order to get the
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Doesn't even show on `top`. Further, it gets the CPU about 100 times
> > a second (HZ). This is normally what you want for something that
> > polls, buts needs to give up the CPU so that whatever it's waiting
> > for can get done as soon as possible
Stephen Burns wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I have checked out the archives, and I found an old post regarding this.
> The solution in the post, however, did not work for me. I am attempting to
> raise the maximum 32 group per user limit on my 2.4.2 kernel. I patched
> both linux/include/linux/limit
Here's one more potential bug for 2.4.3.
-Andy
[BUG]
/u2/acc/oses/linux/2.4.3/drivers/isdn/hysdn/hysdn_net.c:309:hysdn_net_create:
ERROR:NULL:302:309: Using
NULL ptr "dev" illegally! set by 'kmalloc_Rsmp_93d4cfe6':302
Start --->
if ((dev = kmalloc(sizeof(struct net_local), GFP_KERNEL))
> Doesn't even show on `top`. Further, it gets the CPU about 100 times
> a second (HZ). This is normally what you want for something that
> polls, buts needs to give up the CPU so that whatever it's waiting
> for can get done as soon as possible.
Hi,
first of all I want to do this in kernel.
I n
Grover, Andrew wrote:
>> From: Trever L. Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> 2.4.3 no longer shuts down automatically with S5.
>>
>> [2.] Full description of the problem/report:
>>
>> 2.4.3 no longer shuts down automatically with S5. I have an Athlon
>> based system using the FIC-SD11 motherb
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Looks ok to me but given the ability of the average kernel hacker to read
> help texts I;d rather it was a choice menu of say
OK, I guess I gave too much credit :)
This gives 4 options, 4K, 8K, 16K, and 32K.
4K is for the embedded guys, but they might want even less.
32K is
Tim Waugh escribió:
>
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:59:33AM +0200, Juan wrote:
>
> > I have the same problem in two different machines but they both are UP.
> > However, my kernel configuration has SMP support enabled.
>
> Could you build a kernel without SMP support and see if the problem
> sti
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:52:32PM -0300, Sarda?ons, Eliel wrote:
> switch (prev->state) {
> case TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE:
> if (signal_pending(prev)) {
> prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
> break;
>
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Since we expect to get errata docs very soon Im not that worried. As an
> implementation I'd rather a module option of 'ignore_blacklist' or similar
> so that it is runtime
This seamed to work here.
-Thomas
diff -u --new-file --recursive linux-2.4.3-ac2.orig/drivers
> From: Trever L. Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> 2.4.3 no longer shuts down automatically with S5.
>
> [2.] Full description of the problem/report:
>
> 2.4.3 no longer shuts down automatically with S5. I have an Athlon
> based system using the FIC-SD11 motherboard. In 2.4.1 and possibly
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> On 04.05 Miao Qingjun wrote:
> > Can anybody help me?
> > How to embed linux into a board based on QED rm5230
> > mips cpu?
> http://www.uclinux.org/
rm5230 isnt a microcontroller.
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lin
Hey all,
I have checked out the archives, and I found an old post regarding this.
The solution in the post, however, did not work for me. I am attempting to
raise the maximum 32 group per user limit on my 2.4.2 kernel. I patched
both linux/include/linux/limits.h and the asm-i386/param.h, replac
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:28:33PM +0200, Johan Adolfsson wrote:
> Would it be a good idea to have support for multiple Configure.help
> files in the config system?
> The main advantage would be that arch specific settings could
> have an arch specific help file as well.
I don't see why this woul
BTW, my 2.4.3-pre8 kernel just said
| sym53c875-0:0: ERROR (81:0) (3-21-0) (10/9d) @ (script 8a8:0b00).
| sym53c875-0: script cmd = 1100
| sym53c875-0: regdump: da 10 80 9d 47 10 00 0d 00 03 80 21 80 01 09 09 00 30 4e 00 08
|ff ff ff.
| sym53c875-0-<0,*>: FAST-20 WIDE SCSI 40.0 MB/s (50
Hello,
If there's a forum more specifically dedicated to 2.4 networking,
please point me in the right direction, otherwise please consider
the following. (I'm on lkml so you don't need to CC: me)
Is there a way to set the sequence number sent in the SYN
response to an incoming connnection reque
On 04.05 Miao Qingjun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anybody help me?
>
> How to embed linux into a board based on QED rm5230
> mips cpu?
>
http://www.uclinux.org/
--
J.A. Magallon # Let the source
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] # be wi
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
2.4.3 no longer shuts down automatically with S5.
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
2.4.3 no longer shuts down automatically with S5. I have an Athlon
based system using the FIC-SD11 motherboard. In 2.4.1 and possibly
2.4.2 the system used to
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
Mozilla and other programs easily get in D State
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
Mozilla is easy to get into D State. Simply start it 2001040414 build.
This is not the only program that I have doing this. It is just the
easiest to make do
Hi,
Can anybody help me?
How to embed linux into a board based on QED rm5230
mips cpu?
How can I do step by step?
Its configuration is
rm5230 cpu
galileo controller
rom
flash ram
nvram/rtc
uart
Thanks in advance.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email a
"Albert D. Cahalan" wrote:
>
> > I'm running the 2.4.3 kernel and my system always (!) crashes when I try
> > to generate the "Linux kernel poster" from lgp.linuxcare.com.au. After
> > working for one hour, the kernel printed this message:
>
> I'd guess you have a heat problem. Check for dust, a
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Gérard Roudier wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > I did some more tests:
> > > - The problem als
David Balazic wrote:
>
> Requirements :
> - working TV-out ( S-Video or composite-video ), I mean really working
>and supported in linux, not "it works if the BIOS initializes it and
>Linux doesn't touch it"
G400 (not G450, TVout on G450 is not supported and maybe never will).
But
you
I'm confused. 3c59x.c has a little acpi WOL stuff, but that's it.
What specifically is ACPI doing to break things? Are ACPI and the NIC
sharing any resources?
Regards -- Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna P Subash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 11:12
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, John Jasen wrote:
> got this on booting up 2.4.2-ac28:
> Apr 5 09:36:37 grim kernel: kernel BUG at slab.c:1244!
> Apr 5 09:36:37 grim kernel: invalid operand:
errr ... belay that one.
a) I said I didn't get it in 2.4.3-ac3, which was only about 30% correct.
(I've gott
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 08:42:32PM -0700, James Simmons wrote:
> Also take a look at http://www.vt100.net . Since linux tries to emulate
> the Dec vt100 at this site you will find the vt100 manuals. They are quite
> good and the esc codes are well described in them.
>
> MS: (n) 1. A debilitating
Carsten Langgaard wrote:
>
> Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > Current Linux driver switches them to 16bit mode in pcnet_probe1:
> >
> > pcnet_dwio_reset(); // reset to 16bit mode when in 32bit, ignore in
> > 16bit mode
> > pcnet_wio_reset(); // device is for sure in 16bit mode, but reset it
> > again
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
buz.c, 6pack.c use nonexistant KMALLOC_MAXSIZE in 2.4.3
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
buz.c:2837: `KMALLOC_MAXSIZE' undeclared (first use in this function)
in kernel-source-2.4.3:
$ find . -name '*.h' | xargs grep KMALLOC_MAXSIZE
$ find . -
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> > > 32bit writes on a bus with a word size of 64 or more bits. By the way
> > > does anyone know who didn't implement MTRR's or the equivalent on
> > > alpha so we can shoot them?
> >
> > People
Thats right. ACPI was what made 3c90x not work :( With APM it works perfectly.
Thanks Marcus.
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:14:56AM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > hi lkml,
> > I just built 2.4.3-ac3 with my old 2.4.2 .config and somehow networki
>
>Hi
>
>This driver seems to be pretty broken, the way it is. It does not compile.
>The new author, Justin T. Gibbs, has been careful in avoiding to mention
>his e-mail address in his code :-(
I actually don't believe in putting email address in code. They become
stale far too easily. If you e
Hi
This driver seems to be pretty broken, the way it is. It does not compile.
The new author, Justin T. Gibbs, has been careful in avoiding to mention
his e-mail address in his code :-( Hence the post to this list.
As the first problem, the compile stops in aicasm_gram.c because in
aicasm_gram.
Hi !
I am looking for a gfx card to purchase for use with Linux.
Requirements :
- working TV-out ( S-Video or composite-video ), I mean really working
and supported in linux, not "it works if the BIOS initializes it and
Linux doesn't touch it"
- video support ( in HW and linux-SW ) is de
On 04.05 Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> Try this and watch your compiler complaining:
>
> #define foo() { }
> #define bar() do { } while (0)
> void mumble ()
> {
> if (1) foo(); else bar();
> if (2) bar(); else foo();
> }
>
Perhaps it is time to USE gcc, yet the kernel can be built
Would it be a good idea to have support for multiple Configure.help
files in the config system?
The main advantage would be that arch specific settings could
have an arch specific help file as well.
Anybody who knows: Would it be a easy to add support for this if
this is considered a good idea?
>The latest aic7xxx-6.1.9 doesn't boot, I can see something like:
>
>scsi1:0:0:0: Attempting to queue an ABORT message
>scsi1:0:0:0: Command found on device queue
>aic7xxx_abort returns 8194
Either disable the initial bus reset in SCSI-Select or lower
the bus settle delay from 15000ms to somet
LA Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was running 2 copies of setiathome on a 4 CPU server
>@ work. The two processes ran nice'd -19. The builds we were
>running still took 20-30% longer as opposed to when setiathome wasn't
>running (went from 45 minutes up to about an hour). This mac
On 5 Apr 2001, John Fremlin wrote:
> "Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 4 Apr 2001, John Fremlin wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Oliver!
> > >
> > > Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > is there a way to let all other runable tasks run until they block
> > > >
"Manuel A. McLure" wrote:
>
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote:
> > > It looks like the tulip driver isn't as up-to-date as the one from
> > > 2.4.2-ac20 - when is 2.4.3-ac1 due? :-) I got NETDEV
> > WATCHDOG errors shortly
> > > after rebooting with 2.4.3, altho
Hi,
is this something to worry about ?
in dmesg:
PCI: Address space collision on region 9 of device VIA Technologies, Inc.
VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] [8080:808f]
I know it might be unrelated with ACPI being experimental but if the
kernel is compiled with ACPI instead of APM the machine (Pre
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Jani Monoses wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Bjorn Wesen wrote:
> > ERESTARTSYS is a part of the api between the driver and the
> > signal-handling code in the kernel. It does not reach user-space (provided
> > of course that it's used appropriately in the drivers :)
>
> As an e
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Bjorn Wesen wrote:
>
> ERESTARTSYS is a part of the api between the driver and the
> signal-handling code in the kernel. It does not reach user-space (provided
> of course that it's used appropriately in the drivers :)
As an example sound/via82cxxx_audio.c returns ERESTAR
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 05:54:30PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05 2001, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
> > > Where? Calling buffer_IO_error would be ok, but there are no such calls
> > > in 2.4.3. I just stated elsewhere that submit_bh should probably be
> > > clearing the dirty bit, not l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> compiler (gcc --version): pgcc-2.95.2
> I hope i have included enough information for you and that you will be
> able to solve my problem.
grep --context pgcc Documentation/Changes
See also http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s8-9, #s8-5 and indeed most of the rest
of §8.
--
"Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 4 Apr 2001, John Fremlin wrote:
> >
> > Hi Oliver!
> >
> > Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > is there a way to let all other runable tasks run until they block
> > > or return to user space, before the task wishing to do
On Wed, 04 Apr 2001, Jean Paul Sartre wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Manfred H. Winter wrote:
>
> > Apr 4 02:05:21 marvin pppd[1227]: Couldn't set tty to PPP discipline: Invalid a
> > rgument
> > Apr 4 02:05:21 marvin pppd[1227]: Exit.
>
> Did you load the 'ppp_async.o' module?
>
Sorry,
On Thu, Apr 05 2001, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
> > Where? Calling buffer_IO_error would be ok, but there are no such calls
> > in 2.4.3. I just stated elsewhere that submit_bh should probably be
> > clearing the dirty bit, not ll_rw_block, in which case the b_end_io
> > is fine. But buffer_IO_er
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 05:37:31PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05 2001, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
> > > Irks, another one. lvm_make_request_fn also needs to call b_end_io
> > > if a map fails.
> >
> > This is wrong.
> >
> > In case of an io error we do already call buffer_IO_error()
> Its a kernel bug if it gets stuck like this. You need to provide more info
> though - what file system, what devices, how much memory. Also ps can give you
> the wait address of a process stuck in 'D' state which is valuable for debug
Let's see if I'm getting this right, processes in D state sh
Steve Grubb writes:
> It would seem to me that after hearing how the macros are used in practice,
> wouldn't turning them into inline functions be an improvement? This is
> something gcc supports, it accomplishes the same thing, and has the added
> advantage of type checking.
> http://gcc.gn
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Steve Grubb wrote:
> It would seem to me that after hearing how the macros are used in practice,
> wouldn't turning them into inline functions be an improvement? This is
> something gcc supports, it accomplishes the same thing, and has the added
> advantage of type checking.
>
On Thu, Apr 05 2001, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
> > Irks, another one. lvm_make_request_fn also needs to call b_end_io
> > if a map fails.
>
> This is wrong.
>
> In case of an io error we do already call buffer_IO_error() on 2.4 in
> lvm_map().
Where? Calling buffer_IO_error would be ok, but t
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> It looks like the new xircom_cb driver only works as module - if built
> in kernel there is no sign of eth0 setup.
Built as a module works beutifully :) No need to "ifconfig -promisc" to
make it work after a suspend.
Anyway, you still have to unlo
Hello,
since kernel-version 2.4.1 I am not able to compile the kernel for my
system (currently I run version 2.4.0). This is in my point of view due
to a not included function but since i do not know if this is correct I
send the output of the linking part of the kernel:
-- start output --
ld
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Jani Monoses wrote:
> although the comments in errno.h say that ERESTARTSYS should not be seen
> by userland,many drivers seam to return it from their
> file_operations.Should glibc convert this errno so that the user program
> sees something meaningful?Because it does not.Is E
Jens,
thanks for the b_dev hint you provided.
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:49:42PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05 2001, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > To the LVM folks: you can't use b_dev or b_blocknr inside your
> > make_request_fn, it destroys stacking drivers such as loop. And
> > is just p
It would seem to me that after hearing how the macros are used in practice,
wouldn't turning them into inline functions be an improvement? This is
something gcc supports, it accomplishes the same thing, and has the added
advantage of type checking.
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-2.95.3/gcc_4.ht
On Thursday 05 April 2001 16:57, you wrote:
> At some Kernel release between 2.4.2 and 2.4.3 I succeeded to install
> Mandrake Cooker (Devel-Tree) out of the box.
> However, we have switched to another SCSI RAID controller as the AMI
> MegaRAID driver in conjunction with I2O seems to be very bugg
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
